A Response to the Hamlet Play - Essay Example

A Response to the Hamlet Play by William Shakespeare Act of the Hamlet plays clearly depicts how power was transferred from one monarch to the next in England. The entire play brings the case of King Hamlet who died in power, as well as, the betrayals and uncertainties that accompany the shifts in power. The appearance of the ghost of the deceased King Hamlet indicates a problem in Denmark (MacDonald 34). Horatio’s interpretation of the frightening ghost implies a tragedy to the audience and the characters, as well.

Shakespeare attracts the attention of the audience by presenting Horatio, an intelligent, trustworthy, and skeptical man who is frightened by the ghost. I think the audience would have defied the ghost's existence if only the watchmen concentrated on the ghost. Shakespeare presents various characters in Act 2 when they are spying on one another. For example, Gertrude and Claudius are discussing how they will spy on Hamlet by means of Guildenstern and Rosencrantz (MacDonald 35). I don’t understand how King Hamlet is spied against and he is already dead.

I think there was a disarrangement of the scenes or actions. However, Shakespeare reveals the stupidity and clumsiness of some characters such as Claudius who tries to spy on Hamlet using untrustworthy fellows. It is very disturbing that Hamlet does not mention revenge against the spies until the end of the act. I also expect Hamlet to act better because he is the most gifted politician among the prominent leaders. Shakespeare seems to divert his audience to a fantasy world by presenting comical and joking characters.

The transition between Act 1 to Act 2 scene II is shocking and hard to understand because Hamlet doesn’t seem to revenge against Claudius (MacDonald 37). Instead, he invents jokes and uses dazzling language that nullifies the audience’s urge to witness revenge.