Plato and platypus walk into a bar - Essay Example

The notions of the text are based on the thoughts of some of the renowned world thinkers and philosophers such as Kant, Marx and Mills. The authors of this text aim to elaborate the fundamental notions of philosophy and demonstrate such principles through jokes. They are tackling some significant arguments and categories that explore logic, language philosophy and ethics, as well as relativity. Thus, this book offers both education and entertainment information to its readers. The text explores some serious human questions in a manner that makes them comprehensible while embracing them intelligently and humorously.

Therefore, this text is a non-fictional, provoking and sophisticated material, which enables readers to understand the thrilling world thinkers and understand some life’s greatest lessons, made comprehensible and laughable through humorous jokes. Philosophy is an essential component in human life. Therefore, this book is significant to readers because it has ideas on philosophy that are simplified through jokes. Therefore, philosophy is relevant to the world populations because by leaning philosophy people are aided into thinking better.

This is because philosophy aids people to comprehend why they think the way they do and offers them options to expand their possibilities. Therefore, philosophy is instrumental in the world because it enables people, to understand the ways through which others can apply, to manipulate and influence their thinking, and how some people may get others to believe misleading information, which is damaging and untrue. Therefore, philosophy is crucial in enabling people to make better and excellent judgments as well as aiding in assisting people to influence and persuade the thinking of those around them to view the world from their perspective.

Therefore, philosophy is critical in influencing people’s beliefs, faith and perspectives as well as how they reason when faced with decisions that require their careful analysis. Furthermore, the text is instrumental in elaborating the Sherlock Holmes and inductive logic idea. This is integral in explaining the difference between induction and deduction. They apply a joke example to explain this notion. They explain that inductive logic is a procedure, which is applied to confirm scientific theories referred from particular happenings to general theories.

They explain that if a person observes the manner in which apples fall from trees, such a person will formulate a general hypothesis involving other falling materials such as mangoes. This is because the apples only fall downwards and not sideways or upwards which will aid in the formulation of such a conclusion. They use the literary character Sherlock Holmes, as an example, and how he applies inductive logic as opposed to deductive logic, on his analysis of situations, whereby he first observes a situation, then generalizes based on his previous experiences, utilizing probability and analogy.

For instance, when Holmes and Watson went on a camping trip, he wakes up on the middle of the night and asks Watson to tell him what he sees on the sky. Watson applies scientific knowledge to explain what he sees on the sky; that is numerous stars. He offers astronomical, astrological and meteorological as well as theological possibilities of his observation. However, when Watson asks Holmes what he observes, Holmes calls him an idiot and concludes that their tent has been stolen (Cathcart and Daniel 30).

Therefore, this example, leads to the two