Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
A victim of misleading behavior can claim damages, which can be in the form of monetary compensation. The measure of damages in the consumers’ law is the same as in tort or contract law. According to the Consumer and Competition Act, people who contribute to the damage or loss suffered will receive fewer damage amounts if the courts grant it.
The United States can use drone action in accordance with international law, in cases where applied military force is against terrorist groupings like al-Qaeda, al-Shabaab, or Taliban. Future US governments should install military drone projects which allow public scrutiny so as to adhere to the rule of law.
Preview sample
sponsored ads
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Police are fundamentally concerned with keeping the peace and upholding criminal law dependent upon their specific mission and locale. Structured in 1908 the Federal Bureau of Investigation started as an element that could research and authorize particular elected laws as an investigative and "law authorization organization" in the United States.
Sonangol is an oil company owned by the government of the people’s republic of Angola. It is the central organization in the oil exploration and foreign investments. In need of doing business in the O & G industry, it must liaise with it. These contracts take the form of the Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) and joint ventures.
With the above argument, it is then noted that statutes are more flexible than other forms of laws. This means that the other forms of laws are more powerful than the statute law. If these statutes are weak and can be changed anytime, then a judge can influence these statute laws and make decisions upon his/her defined laws.
As a shareholder, there are some rights transferred upon registration as a member of a company after acquiring shares. The shareholder has the benefits of receiving dividends depending on the number of shares acquired from a company. These dividends are posted into a shareholder's account upon a determination by the board of directors.
To sum up, although the wearing of veils might be attributed to the freedom of religious expression, wearing it in public places could give rise to key sensitive issues. From the above analysis, it can be assumed that both European, as well as domestic institutions, appears to be divided when it comes to banning the headscarf.
Any agreements or decisions prohibited pursuant to this Article shall be automatically void (Article 101(2) TFEU). Consequently, the proposed agreement between HGL and MM cannot come to fruition in its current form as that would be repugnant to the provisions of this Article and the entire Treaty as a whole.
When we critically analyze the above decisions for Waller J. and Laddie J., there is a clear path towards the common stand that the recipient has the responsibility of ensuring that it considers all possible situations surrounding the authenticity of any document sent before it can take any action upon the authority.
In the United Kingdom and other jurisdictions, this liability is based on four major sources. These include defamation, invasion of privacy, and negligence referral or breach of duty to warn. The University of Sussex and other Universities in the United Kingdom are also liable under these sources of liability for providing reference information.
It was seen that the UK Supreme Court too did not try to discover the common intention test in the French transactional law that is relevant to determine the differences in the States in order to implement the instrumentalities in the arbitration context. This approach was jointly guided by the law experts in the court.
Nonetheless, as long as the administrator of a website is not responsible for the production or creating of the website or even approval of its contents, they are not likely to be found to have made a representation that is deceptive or misleading (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Google Inc [2012] FCAFC 49).
In Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd Lord Denning MR hiked the damages to £5500. The grounds for doing this was that the plaintiffs claim for all the damage coming directly from the fraudulent activity which was not taken as too remote by the conduct of the plaintiff. Regardless of whether the defendant would have predicted the significant loss.
The nature of documentary compliance is a major factor to consider during the application of this legal item. The fact is that it relates to loaning means that the cost of operating using this item is also higher than the normal methods of payment. This is due to the established fee that banks charge to offer this kind of service.
From the arguments above, in a bid to answer the question of the exemption of mentally ill offenders from the normal sanctions of the court, several arguments have emerged. Firstly, it is true to say that a psychiatric diagnosis can exempt a psychologically unstable criminal from the normal verdicts of the criminal justice system.
It is imperative to note it is neither possible nor reasonable to expect prison imams to be terrorist experts and spiritual advisers. Their role is to make certain the proviso of adequate religious services and take care of the spiritual needs of the terrorist prisoners. They are not supposed to be involved in the role played by prison staff.
August 2011 riots surely proved to be a great challenge for judges and law enforcement agencies. Apparently it seemed that the offenders were sentenced far more than the legal requirements depending upon their crimes. However, critical analysis shows that majority of sentences were based upon ethical considerations.
The Obama administration is still facing legal challenges discouraging the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Most of the Law comes from attorney Oklahoma who argues that the Act only offers subsidies and tax credits to individuals who purchase the health insurance covers from state-run-exchanges.
Some countries, including England, Wales, Canada, and Australia rejected presumptive sentencing guidelines centered on American innovations. Outside the United States, England is the only jurisdiction that managed to develop and implement comprehensive, offense-specific policies and generic ones as well (Ashworth 2011, p. 128).
The EU has made a major landmark in steering forward integration and has succeeded in doing so through its improvised institutions. Though it has not been a smooth encounter, its effective management and all-inclusive agenda that it holds on social, political and religious grounds has proved the body’s worthiness.
Since all the actions regard different ways of purchases of the product, the paper lays out the circumstances, and contentions faced by the four buyers. The Sale of Goods Act is a critical chapter that defines the laws which help to remedy purchase and sales problems to do with stolen goods, description of goods, quality satisfaction, inter alia (Sale of Goods Acts, 1979).
For the developer to convert the office space into residential parts, it is important that he or she seek planning permission. The developer should also ensure that all the conservation measures are put in place to avoid energy conservation challenges. There are also various rules and policies that the developer must include in its plan.
Begum considered the school’s uniform policy as an abuse of her religious sentiments and thus filed a case against the school by taking reference to Article 9 of the ‘European Convention on Human Rights’. However, the court’s decision aimed towards maintaining the dress code sensitiveness that has been considered appropriate for every Islamic organization.
In businesses, the function of law is deemed to be affirmed in terms of preserving order and avoiding conflicts from internal and external sources. As such, when peace and order are sustained, a happy and conflict-free society would ensure the expected performance of citizens towards productivity and healthy well-being.
Organized serial killers are mostly influenced by environmental and social reasons. Rejection by their families or people close to them influences them to practice or exhibit homicidal behaviors. Disappointment or anger from situations they consider unfair can also cause them to exhibit these behaviors.
6 pages (2115 words)
, Download 1
, Literature review
Free
The Institute Cargo Clauses provide insurance cover against “all risks”. However, an in-depth analysis of the “all risks” guarantee reveals that the policies do not actually indemnify the assured against all risks. First and foremost, the term “all risks” only applies to those losses not excluded under the exclusion clauses 4-7.
The Treaty of Lisbon created innovation in the governance similar to a federal system but it did not provide any concrete changes in the way that the Union is operated and there are already demands a more responsive and updated treaty from the supporters of a European Federation given the current economic, political and international context.
The approaches provided by the Commonwealth Chemicals Commission on the two instances (Sara and Julian, and Brigitta and Evo Pty Ltd) do not present the commission as a neutral pursuer of offenders. The parties in both cases should be tried in accordance with the provisions of the Importation of Prohibited Substances Act (2012).
People can freely move from EU nation to the other and work, reside and get educated in the same while enjoying all the social and legal rights. However, any illegal activities of the migrant people can impact a particular society and certainly lead to termination of their residential and social rights offered by the free movement law of the EU.
Depending on the nature of the industry or sector of the economy under which an employer operates, the documents necessary for maintaining Human Resource records may differ from one organization to the other. However, there are basic documentations that every employer must maintain to comprise the Human Resource records.
The Crown Prosecution service have clear roles for every arm of the criminal justice system. There are exclusive cases that can be retried even after acquittal if the case is of serious nature. This can be done through a written consent to the Director of Public Prosecutions and application to the court of appeal.
This assignment also focuses on the act that provides guidelines on prosecuting juveniles, various risk factors among the defendants that have been reported and lead to re-offending behavior. The period of criminal responsibility is ten years. The reason it is ten years is that under such an age all children are considered doli Inc Apax.
The introduction of a DPA to the UK legal system has only been proposed formally recently by the Ministry of Justice and the response has been mixed at best. It may be viewed as a revenue-generating exercise because it only targets corporations and not individuals, especially since corporations possess financial resources that can be used to avoid heavy sanctions.
Irrespective of the much-debated success potentials of the Doha Round, it had to face failure. Critics have thus been arguing that the most possible reasons for the failure were globalization and liberalization opportunities not being exploited up to their fullest extent. In addition, the aggressive interest of the participating nations was less.
Pinky Salmon, tampered with the chandelier, thereby revealing his criminal intent to endanger the life of Allie. However, he claimed that his intention was to merely threaten Allie. According to the Criminal Damage Act 1971, a person will be deemed guilty, if he commits damage to property with an intention to jeopardize others' life.
It is paramount to reiterate that being the first of the achievement of the WTO, the Bali package is undoubtedly positive. However, the reforms remain far beneath what was envisaged in the Doha convention to ensure developing nations to derive better benefits from participation in the bilateral trading schemes.
Though the extent of negligence in different cases differs, the issue is broadly delineated as the inability of a person to depict the required level of precision, accuracy, attention, or brilliance in performance. This inability causes the death of another person who depends on the services or skill of the defendant. In addition, it may involve omissions.
In any lawful nation, the defendants are not supposed to interfere with the claimant’s right and for this reason, an injunction is always put forward to prevent any future interference with the claimant’s rights. In case of any form of interference from the defendant, common law damages are always there to compensate the claimants.
Allegations have been put across that the law relating to the joint enterprise is intricate, controversial and draconian. The above comment will clarify why it is so while considering the association amid joint initiative and murder. To preserve this comment to a rational extent, an assumption will be made regarding a particular understanding of the law of complicity.
There are two major conflicting philosophies that have since dominated the very development of obscenity law, namely the ‘conservative’ and ‘liberal’ philosophy. Obscenity is determined by looking at the intrinsic wickedness, and this would determine whether that material poses a threat to the organizational structure of the said society.
The interpretation of statutory provisions is now more of a burden because of the inquiries made in the Pepper V. Hart case; the court never upheld the fundamental rights. The extent to which extrinsic aids apply when interpreting statutory provisions relative to the case depends on the context of the evidence and the core references.
Both the mensrea and actus must normally occur in tandem i.e. the criminal intent should precede or occur in coexistence with the criminal act. In the event of a criminal trial, the prosecutor is usually tasked with burden of proving actus reusand mens rea beyond doubt and tries to bar any successful defence.
The case is complicated further by the fact that the tenancy is registered only in the name of Johnson and Patsy is not legally recognized as the joint tenant in the property. Several details point to the existence of a mutual understanding that the ownership in the property was shared and both Johnson and Patsy were contributing to its ownership and maintenance.
The United Kingdom has an uncodified constitution that gives much respect and dignity to humanity. The fact that the uncodified constitution does not coerce the citizens to remain obedient to authority makes it accommodative to all, giving people the power to express themselves freely and give their views.
To enhance adequately realize flexibility and certainty the use of precedence law the British judicial system is encouraged to accurately distinguish case on the basis of evidence provided as well as judges to exercise full power in revising and overruling cases in favor of justice. This will help eliminate unnecessary impedance on flexibility.
Mens rea is insufficient for establishing fault. An element of mens rea is essential for treating a defendant as being liable for the outcomes of his actions. It would be incorrect to conclude that every actus reus element necessitates a corresponding requirement of mens rea. It may be justified to determine the presence of constructive liability.
The concept of separation of powers is a critical part of any constitutional law. Montesquieu, who strongly opposed to vesting powers in the hands of one arm of the government, advocated the development of the model that allows the separation of powers between three branches of the government.
Practical benefits could be observed for consideration in some cases where the real and monetary considerations could not be found. The builder had confessed that he promised to pay an additional amount on the completion of work. The work completion was due at the time when he made the original agreement.