Terrorists to Lose Citizenship as Abbott-Era Laws Go Ahead - Essay Example

Business Law essay and essay plan Name Institution Terrorists to lose citizenship as Abbott-era laws go ahead Short Essay Plan My essay will argue for the favor of the above-proposed legislation. To hold up my argument, I will start by identifying the major reasons leading to the proposed legislation and identify the terrorist issues that led to the statement in the Abbot laws. I will examine the terrorism offences held in the Australian courts leading to the proposal. Secondly, I will identify the process that will be followed by the Australian government in ending citizenship of terrorists and how different methods will be effective. I will finalize my essay by analyzing the implications of this proposal to the rule of law in Australia and how it will affect the Australians’ citizenship. The challenging issues in the research include acquiring the appropriate article with relevant information about the implications of the proposal to the Australian citizenship and rule of law. The recommended referencing component is also a challenge. To make my essay efficient, I look forward at completing the research by week 4 and analyse the information for the final draft by week 5. I will proofread and reference my essay using AGLC in week 6 and submit my work. 189 words Essay Question: Terrorists to lose citizenship as Abbott-era laws go ahead, The Sydney Morning Herald, by David Wroe http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/terrorists-to-lose-citizenship-as-abbottera-laws-go-ahead-20151110-gkvh9v.html Introduction The Australians have experienced several cases of terrorism from some Australians with dual citizenship. The Australian government came up with the proposal of denying the terrorists their citizenship to prevent them from continued habit of conducting terrorist activities. There have been several terrorist deaths experienced by the Australians being killed by their fellow Australians. To improve the security, the Australian government has proposed to end the citizenship of the terrorists caught in criminal acts. This essay seeks to explore the major reasons leading to the proposed legislation and identify the terrorist issues that led to the statement in the Abbot laws. The paper examines the terrorism offences held in the Australian courts leading to the proposal. The essay also identifies the process that will be followed by the Australian government in ending citizenship of terrorists and how different methods will be effective. There is the analysis of the implications of this proposal to the rule of law in Australia and its effect the Australians’ citizenship. Terrorism among the Australian citizens Australia has been experiencing national terrorism conducted by the Australian citizens. According to thorough investigations, the murderers commit the crime and then take some of the properties possessed or owned by the victims, for instance, mobile phones. The behavior lead to thought of the victims being alive1. The police has also investigated and identified that there have been several threats of people wanting to kill others, which is a security breach. In addition, some dual nationals engage into conducts that are terror related. The terrorism issues that led to the statement in the Abbot laws are issues like death of people and destruction of Australians’ properties2. There are other issues associated with some innocent people being held into captivity by the terrorist groups that request for huge amount of money to release the victims. Reasons for the proposed legislation The major reasons leading to the proposed legislation include; the need for improvement of the Australian security3. There is also the interest of preventing continued behavior that is related to terrorism acts and teach those in the terrorist groups a lesson to stop their conduct4. The other reason for the legislation is to try to protect the innocent Australians subjected to terror attacks and increase their trust to the Australian security. The terrorism offences held in the Australian courts leading to the proposal comprises of deaths of people being murdered by the terrorists and threats of murder from the terrorist people5. The process that would be followed in ending citizenship of terrorists The Australian government plans to end the terrorists’ citizenship through renunciation by the conduct whereby the terrorist organization will be eliminated. There will also be revocation through conviction whereby the criminals’ citizenship would be held in the interest and for the reasons well known by the government6. In addition, those caught in dual nationality and engaged in the terrorist groups will not be allowed to continue harming the Australians, but they will be denied their citizenship and never be afforded the personal citizenship no matter what7. The implications of this proposal to the rule of law in Australia The proposed legislation of terminating the terrorists’ citizenship will have various effects the Australians’ citizenship. The convicted dual citizens because of their terrorism acts will receive thorough punishments to prevent them from persistent bad behavior. The legislation will raise some concerns in relation to the human rights since the individual’s right to one’s nationality will be endangered. The rule of law will change the concerns of the human rights and will be required to look for ways to compensate on the same8. The government will effectively protect the national security because the measures adopted in fighting with terrorism are supposed to match with the standards of the international human rights. The bill will also frighten the Australian citizens and since the prime minister will seek for votes in the following elections, it will be hard for the Australians to vote for him9. The rule of law in Australia will be required to change because of showing some concern to the Australians who require remaining in the Australian citizenship. In addition, the Australian government will be required to look for solutions towards dealing with the notorious terrorists and work towards ensuring that the issue of denying them Australian citizenship would not lead to more chaos and crimes10. Due to the issue of damaging or working towards destruction of the national property, the Australian government will be required to conduct unlawful drilling of all the minor and major offences that will lead to stable process of offering citizenship to the dual nationals. The children born in Australia will also risk from losing citizenship once their parents are renounced from their citizenship because the bill will not allow dual nationality11. Since there are some children bought by parents with dual nationality, the crimes committed by the parents will subject children to more troubles and lead them to leading a suffering life in the future12. Treating the children badly because of the sins of their parents will not be fair because the children might end up being accused because of the since committed by their parents because the bill will not change the failure of application of the rules of natural justice. After the citizenship will be stripped out, the Australian government will also lose from the contributions offered by those individuals in the national development since some of them might propose to seek for their national citizenship13. Moreover, as the bill will be made known to all the Australian people, the terrorists might opt to leave the continent for a while and then come back later to cause more harm, thus leading to more destruction in Australia and its citizens. The Australian court will be required to look for better ways of dealing with such offences to avoid wrong judgments and this will require the need of ensuring collection of the necessary evidence and proof towards the suspected crime. There might also be cases of corruption from the criminals trying to cover up their behavior and bad activities and this might lead to experience of more criminal problems in Australia14. However, the Australian government is likely to experience significant change of improved security and development after denying citizenship to the terrorists15. Conclusion The law of terrorists to lose citizenship was proposed because of the increased cases of terrorism in Australia whereby many Australian citizens have died from being in the hands of the terrorists. The Australian government will end the citizenship of the dual nationals through renunciation of their citizenship and through the revocation process. Additionally, the government will ensure that the criminals are not allowed their national citizenship even after the renunciation of their citizenship. The law will have some implications to the rule of law in Australia since it will lead to making the security issues more efficient and the court activities will be made easier. The Australian government will also be required to identify the best ways of protecting the innocents including the children of the parents with dual nationality to protect them from being persecuted or judged because of the sine of their parents. There might also be problems in the politics because the people with dual nationality will develop some fear of voting for the same government and they will not be free to contribute towards the national development projects. Bibliography Baak, Melanie. "Murder, community talk and belonging: an exploration of Sudanese community responses to murder in Australia." African Identities 9, no. 4 (2011): 417-434. Gatt, Krystle. "Sudanese refugees in Victoria: An analysis of their treatment by the Australian Government." International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 35, no. 3 (2011): 207-219. Hayes, Anna, and Robert Mason, eds. Cultures in refuge: seeking sanctuary in modern Australia. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2012. Hill, Lisa, and Cornelia Koch. "The voting rights of incarcerated Australian citizens." Australian Journal of Political Science 46, no. 2 (2011): 213-228. Klein, Natalie. "David Hicks, Stern Hu, Scott Rush, Jock Palfreeman and the legal parameters of Australia's protection of its citizens abroad." Melb. UL Rev. 35 (2011): 134. Levey, Geoffrey Brahm. "Liberal nationalism and the Australian citizenship tests." Citizenship Studies 18, no. 2 (2014): 175-189. McAdam, Jane. Refugees: Why seeking asylum is legal and Australia's policies are not. UNSW Press, 2014. McClean, Georgie. "SBS’s multilingual dilemma: global media,“community languages” and cultural citizenship." Global Media Journal-Australian Edition 6, no. 1 (2012). Nakhoul, Ghassan. "Media Representations of Arabs & Muslims in Post-Multicultural Australia." (2013). Stratton, Jon. Uncertain lives: Culture, race and neoliberalism in Australia. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2011. Woodlock, Rachel. "Being an Aussie Mossie: Muslim and Australian identity among Australian-born Muslims." Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 22, no. 4 (2011): 391-407. Read More