StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Negligence and Vicarious Liability - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
In law, vicarious liability applies in the case where an employee acts in negligence or omission in the course of performing duties that are within the scope of their employment (Laski 1916). This kind of liability falls under the doctrine of respondeat superior. An act is…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.2% of users find it useful
Negligence and Vicarious Liability
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Negligence and Vicarious Liability"

The paper "Negligence and Vicarious Liability" is a brilliant example of a case study on law. In law, vicarious liability applies in the case where an employee acts in negligence or omission in the course of performing duties that are within the scope of their employment (Laski 1916). This kind of liability falls under the doctrine of respondeat superior. An act is deemed to be within the precincts of employment if it is authorized or somehow linked with an act that is authorized in such a manner that it may be considered wrong or improper mode of doing it.

In principle, an employer is held responsible for the negligent acts of his/her employer in the course of duty since the employee at this point acts as their employer’s agent. Negligence encompasses the failure to take reasonable care in handling a situation as would be expected in similar circumstances as noted by Deakin, Angus, and Basil (2003). In order to establish the existence of negligence in a case, there must be a duty, breach, and damage caused by carelessness (Hopkins, 2009).

  Seamus and William’s Injury Claims In any working environment, the employer has a vital obligation of making sure that all the employees are safe. The employer is meant to protect all the workers in avoiding any injuries that may happen. Similarly, the employer should give clear information on the health of the employees, the safety issues and how they should conduct their activities (Elias & Levinkind, 2007: p, 38). Mike’s duty was to clean and not to drive forklifts. In accepting to drive the forklift for Tony, Mike breaches the law in that he performs an activity that he is not qualified to do in the workplace.

He acts out of carelessness in accepting to perform an activity not suitable for him. In Armagas Limited v Mundogas S.A. [1986], vicarious liability based on the fact that the employees acted in line of their duty in committing negligent acts and omissions. In this particular case, Seamus is injured in an accident that happened due to the negligence of his two co-workers during working hours and on the company’s premises. Similarly, in Panorama Developments (Guildford) Limited v Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics Limited [1971], it was held that the fraudulent hiring of vehicles by a company secretary without the knowledge of the CEO led to the employer’s liability.

In this respect, management does not have to be aware of Mike’s and Tony’s actions to assume responsibility for the damages caused to William. Since the accident occurs at the workplace and in the course of Mike’s duty, his employer is liable with respect to vicarious liability. In this case, Seamus has the right to make a claim against his employer based on vicarious liability and should be compensated for the damages incurred thus. William’s accident In establishing the presence or absence of negligence, duty, breach, and damage have to be considered.

Furthermore, in establishing the existence of vicarious liability, the aforementioned factors (negligence, duty, breach, and damage) have to be confirmed (Hopkins, 2009). One of the things that may exempt an employer from liability arising due to their agents’ misdeeds is the non-use of required safety devices by the injured. It may be argued in this case that it is due to the non-use of safety devices that led to injuries that otherwise would have been avoided. Since Jerry had done all the work of the day, he was to return the van back to the workplace other than going to pick up his daughter.

After making the last deliveries, the accident occurred. Jerry, therefore, embarked on a personal duty with his employer’s van. The accident was caused by negligence which means that he was careless in performing his duty as a qualified driver. The damage is noted in that William gets injured during the accident even though he is not wearing a seatbelt. Due to the fact that the accident happened while Jerry was on personal duty, the employer does not become vicariously liable as noted by Hopkins (2009: p 35).

In this case, the employer is not vicariously liable for the damages caused by the driver since under normal circumstances the van driver in the knowledge of the employer is not at work after making the final deliveries or after hours. In McWilliams (or Cummings) v Sir William Arrol & Co. Ltd [1962], it is legally established that failure to wear safety devices by an employee or injured person exempt the employer from vicarious liability. In this sense, the injured failed to wear a safety belt that could have prevented his injury.

The van driver, in this case, assumes personal liability for his negligence while William may not make a claim for damages since he did not wear a safety device as required by law.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Negligence and Vicarious Liability Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words, n.d.)
Negligence and Vicarious Liability Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. https://studentshare.org/law/1756246-law-assignment
(Negligence and Vicarious Liability Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Negligence and Vicarious Liability Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1756246-law-assignment.
“Negligence and Vicarious Liability Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/law/1756246-law-assignment.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Negligence and Vicarious Liability

Concepts and Understanding of the Business Laws

It was supposed to be the potential liability of Purple Pumpkin to test the food that is supplied to them before providing them to the customers.... Considering the breach of duty, it can be said that the liability of Purple Pumpkin primarily lay with the understanding of taking precautions since with food not fit for consumption lies the greater risks of food poisoning and danger, which seem to have been neglected by the employees and managers of the company (Tufal, n....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Law of Obligations(Tort) LLB

Frances (and his parents), depending upon the effect of the incident on the child, may also have a claim for psychological damage against the nursery brought about by the latter's negligence.... The cameraman was then in breached of his duty of care and the BBC was vicariously liable for that negligence.... Jack's negligence in leaving the drill on the floor in a place where thirty (30) toddlers freely roam about constitutes a negligent act for which the employer must be held vicariously responsible....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Contracts forming

whether Freda is entittiled to get damages Before proceeding to discuss whether Arkwreight is liable to pay off the damages to Freda, we will explore the concept of 'vicarious liability','negligence', and 'duty of care' under Tort Law.... ** Whenever we discusss the vicarious liability of an...
4 Pages (1000 words) Case Study

Vicarious Liability -Legal Aspects in Health Care

This paper distinguishes between corporate criminal liability and vicarious liability resulting from negligence of a health It further defines and discusses apparent agency and the impact the status of the agent/employee versus independent contractor have on the analysis of liability.... When it comes to criminal prosecution of negligence in the medical field, the law is in no way lenient.... Murthy defines negligence as carelessness in a situation where the law mandates one to be careful....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

What Is Vicarious Liability

At that time, he got into a car accident and as a result, the plaintiff sued both the driver and his employer for Negligence and Vicarious Liability under the theory of respondeat superior.... vicarious liability: A liability imposed upon… Within this case, AAA Dealers would not be liable for John's negligence.... 4th 798 (respondeat superior, vicarious liability), OShea v.... d 1101 (vicarious liability)2.... vicarious liability: A liability imposed upon one person because of the act or omission of another, such as his employee....
2 Pages (500 words) Research Paper

Medical Malpractice: When Can Patients Sue a Hospital for Negligence

This is under the principle of vicarious liability which provides that, employers will be deemed to be vicariously liable for the torts of their employees but only those committed during the course of employment.... This is under the principle of vicarious liability which provides that, employers will be deemed to be vicariously liable for the torts of their employees but only those committed during the course of employment.... HospitalThe hospital's liability will be solely dependant on its employee's liability simply based on the principle of vicarious liability....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Organizational Management of Healthcare Institutions

Most Not-for-Profit organizations include hospitals, which is liable for corporate Negligence and Vicarious Liability under the doctrine of Respondeat Superior.... The first principle that is presented by the case is vicarious liability under the doctrine of Respondeat Superior where the employers are liable for the negligent acts of their employees.... Additionally, the module looks at the liability that is imposed on the institution and the management....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Vicarious Liability

In the paper “vicarious liability” the author analyzes several possible tortuous claims against Whacky Builders Ltd.... is liable for the negligence of its workmen on each occasion.... is vicariously liable for the negligence of its employees if they hope to be compensated by the company....
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us