Download file to see previous pages...
When charged for criminal or civil offences, people always have to choose the type of attorney to use because of the benefits they can accrue from them. This paper reports on the pros and cons of a public and private attorney.
The first advantage that associated with public defenders is that they are professionals whose services are given to the public free of charge. Anyone entitled to the services of public attorney does not need to pay. Since they are paid by the county and state governments, the public do not need to spend even a single cent on them. Meaning, they are the cheapest attorneys whose services are guaranteed so long as one qualifies to be represented by them. However, this does not apply to the private defenders who are directly hired by the client who fully pays for their services in case they need to be represented in a court of law. In fact, this is a disadvantage of private defenders (Reyrauch, 2011). Unlike their counterparts, private attorneys only represent one in the court of law if they are properly paid by the same client. Meaning, if one does not have enough money, one might be forced to borrow, take a loan or forfeit the services of a private defender.
The other advantage of a public defender is that their presence in a case might make the case to be presided over and finished within the shortest time possible. As public officers, public defenders often have a backlog of cases to represent. Therefore, in order to save on time, they have to liaise with the prosecutor and the bench to ensure that a case is heard and decided upon within a short time. This is the only way through which they can create room for other cases which are obviously awaiting them. Surprisingly, this does not apply to the private defenders who are keen on simultaneously handling a few cases and spending a lot of time in conducting private investigations and conducting all the other logistical. So, with
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Discuss the pros and cons of private vs. public defense. Please Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1680117-discuss-the-pros-and-cons-of-private-vs-public-defense-please-remember-this-is-not-an-opinion-question
(Discuss the Pros and Cons of Private Vs. Public Defense. Please Research Paper)
“Discuss the Pros and Cons of Private Vs. Public Defense. Please Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1680117-discuss-the-pros-and-cons-of-private-vs-public-defense-please-remember-this-is-not-an-opinion-question.
The idea of running barefoot or in minimalist footwear that mimic barefoot running is being popularized by minimalist shoe manufacturers like Vibram FiveFingers and is gaining scientific backing from medical communities and research groups, some of which are partly sponsored by the shoe companies themselves.
(McDonald, 1983) In respect of a public defender, the fundamental aspect is that the person is an attorney and has a J.D that is a graduate from an American law school and/or passed the state bar, which is dependent upon the jurisdiction. It goes without saying that the experience in respect of public defender would vary similar to that of a private defense attorney.
As the report stresses the main concern of sociology of education is thus a close study of public school setups in the modernized and industrialized society. Sociology of education deals with what may unswervingly or indirectly have an impact on education. The matters that may concern education should be sociological in nature.
A project should be introduced for enhancing the development of a unique training program that meets specific criteria in terms of its cost, its duration and its quality (Olateju, Abdul-Azeez, & Alamutu, 2011, p.1). Evaluation of project – Methods In general, the evaluation of projects has three key parts: a) the identification of costs, b) the identification of outputs and c) the comparison of the findings related to the previous two phases (Marieta, Opreana & Pompiliu 2010, p.132).
Based on the study done on the pros and cons of privatization the paper will arrive at a consensus on the sectors that can be privatized and the ones that require federal governance.
According to Paul Starr ‘Privatization is a fuzzy concept that
The fact that the public sector if government controlled, means that the element of growth is limited to the regulations, which are imposed or implemented by the government. To ensure this is changed it is essential to alter certain ideologies in
The public sector and private sector describe two main types of business. These two sectors provide similar services on some levels, but they differ from one another on a number of issues, which include ownership and objectives.Though there are similarities between the two sectors, there are also differences between the public and private sector
An assistant to a doctor; a nurse manages and observes the patient’s progress through illness, maintains an up to date health record thus providing constant care and medical attention to a patient at all
This essay discusses that compared to the public sector’s programs, the training program suggested for the organization would have such advantage: it would be easier for each employee to talk to the firm’s owner. In public sector, politicians have the role of CEO of large organizations. In the private sector it is easier to visit the firm’s CEO and discuss on all critical employment issues.
Their main goal in their jobs is to make the society is in peace and crime free day and night. All these officers are equipped with skills as they go for academic training and studies on how to maintain law and order. All
12 Pages(3000 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Discuss the pros and cons of private vs. public defense. Please remember this is not an opinion question for FREE!