Court Brief 2 - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Brosseau shot Kenneth Haugen in the back when he tried to run away from the scene. Kenneth Haugen appealed against Brossaeu in the Court of Appeals. This…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.1% of users find it useful
Court Brief 2
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Court Brief 2"

Court Brief for Brosseau v. Haugen, 543 U.S. 194 (2004), Per Curiam. No: Court Brief for Brosseau v. Haugen, 543 U.S. 194 (2004), Per Curiam
Supreme Court of United States decided for Officer Rochelle Brosseau to receive qualified immunity against Haugen’s appeal. Brosseau shot Kenneth Haugen in the back when he tried to run away from the scene. Kenneth Haugen appealed against Brossaeu in the Court of Appeals. This paper will use IRAC method for briefing the case.
The issue highlighted in the case Brosseau v. Haugen is violation of Fourth Amendment by Brosseau and entitlement of Brosseau to the qualified immunity as Brosseau made use of deadly force against Haugen in shooting him in the back when he tried to flee in his vehicle. Is officer Brosseau entitled to qualified immunity for the use of excessive force?
The Court of Appeals decided for Brosseau finding that she was entitled to qualified immunity. There was a “hazy border between excessive and acceptable force” in Brosseau’s actions for which, she was entitled to qualified immunity. Officer Brosseau violated the Fourth Amendment, but she had the cause according to which, “the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm, either to the officer or to the others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force” after which, she was not regarded as a violator of law. According to Haugen, Brosseau violated his federal constitutional rights.
Glen Tamburello reported officer Brosseau about some stolen tools from his shop and blamed Kenneth Haugen, his former crime partner. Later on, Brosseau came to know that for Haugen’s felony, there was no-bail arrest warrant against him for charges of drugs and other offences. When Haugen was in his mother’s driveway, Tamburello accompanied with Matt Attwood drove to Haugen, where they had a fight after which, a neighbor called 911. Brosseau reached the scene and due to her arrival, Haugen got a chance to get away and hide in a neighbor’s backyard. On a radioed report, Brosseau reached there and found Haugen. Haugen tried to escape by jumping into his jeep. Brosseau doubted him trying to get some weapon. However, he was searching for the keys to drive away. Brosseau ordered Haugen multiple times to get out of the vehicle and also fired several times on the driver’s side window with her hand gun. She even tried to get the keys through the side window and hit Haugen with the barrel and butt of her gun, but ignoring all her commands and attempts, Haugen started and drove the jeep a little after which, Brosseau shot in his back considering the life of those officers in danger who were on foot.
While deciding for the case against officer Brosseau, the cases Tennessee v. Gamer (1985), Graham v. Connor (1989), Cole v. Bone (1993), Smith v. Freland (1992) and Estate of Starks v. Enyart (1993) were discussed. The analysis revealed that Brosseau’s actions “fell in the hazy border between excessive and acceptable” putting forward that Brossaeu did not violate Fourth amendment due to which, she was entitled to qualified immunity.
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and the case was remanded for further proceedings. Officer Brosseau was entitled to qualified immunity, as she did not try to violate the Fourth Amendment and it was the situation that made her to fire Haugen in the back.
Lippman, M. (2014). Criminal procedure. 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks California: SAGE Publications. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Court Brief 2 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Court Brief 2 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from
(Court Brief 2 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Court Brief 2 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words.
“Court Brief 2 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


Case brief 2

...?Case Brief By Table of Contents Turner v. Rogers, 131 S.Ct. 2507 3 Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 566U.S. ___ (2012). 5 Arizona et al v. United States, No. 11-182 567 U.S. _____ [2012] 7 Miller v. Alabama, No. 10-9646 567 U.S. _____ [2012] 9 National Federation of Independent Business et al v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. No. 11-393, 567 U.S. _____ [2012] 11 United States v. Alvarez, No. 11-210, 567 U. S. _____ [2012] 13 Bibliography 16 Turner v. Rogers, 131 S.Ct. 2507 Vote: 5-4 I. Facts of the Case A family court in South Carolina order that the appellant pay a weekly sum of $51-73 in child support. The appellant was held in contempt on five separate occasions. Upon...
12 Pages(3000 words)Research Proposal

Amicus (Friend of the Court) (3rd party) Brief for specified current Suprem Court case

...and violation, with an aim of putting the abuses to the task of being accountable. The organization also seeks to challenge the government and other bodies or people who hold powers to observe human rights and to end human rights abuses, particularly with reference to international human rights standards as well as that of the municipal laws. As a leading human rights body, with the aforesaid specific roles, which are highly tangential to the issues of justice , the organization has a legitimate interest to participate in the case and to present an Amicus brief for the same. The organization has a lot of interest in ensuring that justice is done to the defendant. It is the Human Rights Watch that this honorable...
12 Pages(3000 words)Research Paper

Supreme Court Justices (Government 2)

...? SCALIA AND THOMAS The Supreme Court of the United s is one of the most revered of American s. The justices who sit on it have some of the finest legal minds in the country and are sworn to uphold the Constitution, the founding document of the nation. They are widely respected and yet they come to the job with diverse backgrounds and politics. The methods they use to interpret the Constitution often cause widespread controversy and discussion. Two of the justices that are most divisive are Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. Both men are on the conservative wing of the court and have held their position there for many years. Both are remarkably intelligent men who have also been lightning rods for...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Memorandum of Points and Authorities AKA Trail Court Brief

...?SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO THE PEOPLE OF THE OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff FELONY COMPLAINT vs CASE NO. 1045) MARCO VELASCO ) Memorandum of Points and Authorities ) in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Allegations of Violation ) to Penal Code 12024 Defendant ) Date: ) Time: ____________________________________) Court Room: INTRODUCTION The Defendant submit this motion in Opposition to Plaintiff the People of California to Reverse Detention of Defendant. The Prosecution will show that officer’s action to arrest and detain lacked probable cause, illegal, and a violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights. The court should suppress evidence for illegal search, arrest, and detention because the officer failed to provide... weapon”...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Trial court brief

...?Trial Brief The following is a trial brief prepared by (insert NEW MEXICO DISTRICT COURT OF NEW MEXICO NO. CIV. 03-388 Plaintiff, JANE WHITE VS. JEFFERY CALKIN Defendant BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Jane White, the plaintiff, collided with Jeffery Calkin, the defendant, who failed to stop at a stop sign. Ms. White filed a complaint against Sage Rent-A-Car Inc. for negligence in failing to carry insurance. Sage plans to file a Rule 1-012B (6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, alleging that it has filed a surety bond with the superintendent of insurance and is self-insured under the Act, and as such does not read the Act to extend liability to lessors for the damages that result... IS A SET OF...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Recent California or U.S. Supreme Court Case Brief

...7 November Assignment In the renowned Supreme Court Case of Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education, the rule of law was held to be that retaliating against a person because he has complained of being discriminated on the grounds of sex falls under a branch of intentional sex discrimination, which is encompassed by Title IX. This was an important case with respect to intentional sex discrimination and never before had such principle of law been enunciated by the Judiciary. In the light of the selected case, teacher by the name of Roderick Jackson, teaching in the Birmingham, Alabama public school system, brought a suit against the Birmingham Board of Education alleging that the board retaliated against him because he...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Brief analysis of 2 plays

...The Importance of Being Earnest and A Raisin in the Sun: a Brief Analysis An Assignment Submitted by of Establishment XXXX, Section XXXX, Fall 2011 Featuring dynamic characters, both plays, The Importance of Being Earnest by Oscar Wilde, 1895, and A Raising in the Sun by Lorrain Hansberry, 1959, made the growth of their main characters, or protagonists, believable. Accordingly, in the end of the plays I was completely satisfied in the change of the characters. But, instead of focusing on the individual protagonists (for example, Mama, Beneatha, and Asagai in Hasberry’s work, or Jack, Gwendolen, and Cecily in Wilde’s play), we will focus on overall change of the social hero itself in the plays. In A Raising… leading...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Unit 2 IPIntroduction to American Court System

..., or the cases which the court has been limited to, not anything else. Subject matter jurisdiction limits the power of the court so that it can only hear cases which the laws of jurisdiction permit it to. (Subject matter jurisdiction) Personal jurisdiction allows the court to make decisions against or in favor of people who are involved in the case. Every court in a state can exercise personal jurisdiction over the people who live in that state, but not on people who belong to some other state. Therefore, courts cannot implement authority beyond their territories. The government allows the court to pass judgment to all residents of the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

2 page-paper brief for a case

... is admissible as to charges against as long as SDI lacks standing. B. APPLIED ANALYSIS SDI’s entire business seems to have been based on the conducting of fake sleep studies, and the affidavit supports the conclusion that SDI’s purportedly deceitful conduct was regular. This provides some to support the conclusion that Kaplan and Brunk personally had an anticipation of confidentiality in the searched areas and held materials. Works Cited U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney. District of Nevada. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Case No. 2:05-cr-0078-PMP-GWF. The Honorable Philip M. Pro. Web 27 Sep. 2012. ... of suspected tax fraud. At the end of a 2 year investigation...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Court Brief 3

...Court Brief for Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412 (1986), O’Connor J. No: Court Brief for Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412 (1986), O’Connor J. Introduction The Supreme Court of Rhode Island convicted Brian Burbine of 1st degree murder, reaffirmed the decision of jury, and rejected Brian’s claim that as per Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, his signed confessions in the form of waivers should be suppressed. This paper will use IRAC method for briefing the case. Issue The issue highlighted in the case Moran v. Burbine is violation of Fifth and Fourth Amendment by the police officials who interrogated and attained...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Court Brief 2 for FREE!

Contact Us