Nobody downloaded yet

Critically examining Stephen Harpers series of reforms his conservative federal government has introduced to the appointment processes for Section 96 and Supreme Court judges - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
As the party leader, Stephen Harper had the honours to aspire with the party ticket as the prime minister. The conservative campaign approach increased Harper’s…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.7% of users find it useful
Critically examining Stephen Harpers series of reforms his conservative federal government has introduced to the appointment processes for Section 96 and Supreme Court judges
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Critically examining Stephen Harpers series of reforms his conservative federal government has introduced to the appointment processes for Section 96 and Supreme Court judges"

Download file to see previous pages Among the promising aspects that gave Stephen Harper’s conservative party an edge over their rivals refers to the democratic appointment processes for section 96 and Supreme Court judges1. The researcher therefore examines to what extent the conservative government have effected these changes. Consequently, the paper cross-examines the most significant change and a judgement provided regarding beneficial aspects of those reforms.
The judiciary in Canada holds the role of serving as an impartial arbiter. There stands a legal requirement for the judicial system to maintain independence to enhance quality justice among the Canadians. Although the judiciary is termed as equal to the legislature and executive arms of government, appointment, removal, as well as remuneration of judges, relies upon other branches. The role of office of the Supreme Court, as well as the federal court judges, falls under section 96 of the Constitution Act. The section is at times called section 96 judges. The judges sit in the provincial Supreme Court and court of appeal or in other equivalent courts. Provincial and municipal governments appoint provincial lower court judges among others2. The provincially appointed judges’ deals with matters related to provincial legislation and federal legislation. The constitution act, as well as the federal judges act, explains the basis of removal of magistrates, retirement and remuneration. Such provisions follow in various provincial enactments although some may vary from province to province.
Steven Harper and his conservative party have brought a lot of changes to the appointment processes that have by far changed the initial process. The judicial system has for long experienced many excellent appointments in both the provincial as well as territorial superior courts. The Canadian courts for long have gained respect locally and internationally. The house of commons provides a Standing Committee that oversees the justice and human rights that ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Critically examining Stephen Harpers series of reforms his Essay”, n.d.)
Critically examining Stephen Harpers series of reforms his Essay. Retrieved from
(Critically Examining Stephen Harpers Series of Reforms His Essay)
Critically Examining Stephen Harpers Series of Reforms His Essay.
“Critically Examining Stephen Harpers Series of Reforms His Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Critically examining Stephen Harpers series of reforms his conservative federal government has introduced to the appointment processes for Section 96 and Supreme Court judges

Supreme Court Justices (Government 2) a Reagan appointee and has sat on the Court since 1986 and is the senior associate judge. He still has many years of service left. He is known for his sarcastic wit and sharp tongue, as well as for his hard-headedness. He is known for his dissenting opinions. A dissenting opinion disagrees with the majority opinion and is issued separately, often attacking the reasoning of the judges who sided with the majority. As one critic observes: His writing style is best described as equal parts anger, confidence, and pageantry. Scalia has a taste for garish...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Research Lifetime Appointment of Federal Judges

...that experience in any field of service is acquired through long time participation. Opponents of lifetime employment of federal judges argue that having a limited term creates opportunity for introducing new members, probably younger, to the judiciary, who have the capacity to bring new and fresh ideas, which would help build more jurisprudence as they would be more conversant with current trends and issues affecting the society (Carpenter 73). In this context, the opponents insinuate that judges, who have served for a long time, for example 20 years, may tend to take a conservative approach, while interpreting the law, to issues brought before them. On...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...PROJECT The Supreme Court has been involved with the admissibility/suppression topic of eyewitness identification as recent as April, 2006. The most recent case was heard before the Wisconsin Supreme Court re State v Hibl. In this case, a witness accidentally saw the defendant in the court hallway before the trial. The defense argued that this was a suggestive situation, and, therefore, would promote unreliable identification. The prosecution maintained that the spontaneous meeting increased reliability, saying the issue should be decided by the jury. The trial judge suppressed the witness identification, and a...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...The Apocalypse of Adolescence By Yuliya Having read through the article en d "The Apocalypse of Adolescence", several conclusions came to mind. First, juveniles should almost never be given the death penalty, as this provides virtually zero learning in relation to moral guidance and the receipt of understanding as to what is right versus what is wrong. The death penalty takes their young lives and forever changes them, without the opportunity to be rehabilitated by competent sociological or psychological professionals. However, when the case is similar to the one in the article, the juvenile death penalty may be imposed, especially when the children show no regret for their actions. The problem, however, appears to lie in whether...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Critically Acclaimed Supreme Court Cases

...and are “innocent until proven guilty.” TLO vs. NJ One of the most critically acclaimed Supreme Court cases, that supported the rights of citizens against unwarranted searches, a right given to citizens by the 14th Amendment. This issue initiated as a New Jersey student was found smoking in the bathroom. When caught, the student refrained from confessing and then her locker was unlawfully searched and arrested by the principle. Yet, the student’s 4th Amendment rights were exploited. The question remained, do students have the same 4th Amendment rights as other citizens? Does the school, a government institute has to follow the idea of “reasonable and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...Supreme Court Opinions The principle responsibility of the U.S. Supreme Court is to interpret the Constitution. It has thefinal say in settling legal arguments and determining the meaning of laws thereby setting national policy. The Justices write majority and minority opinions following a decision. These fall into four categories, unanimous, divided, very divided and per curium. Unanimous decisions are written when all nine members of the court vote the same way. The Chief Justice (John Roberts) assigns any Justice the task of writing it or may choose himself. Sometimes, if the case has many nuances involved, he may...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...Supreme Court Data of Supreme Court In the United s, the court is considered to be the highest tribunal in the land that is expected to exercise justice to all the citizens. It acts on, and provides fair arbitration to all the controversies and cases that arise under the constitution or the law. It being the final arbiter, the Supreme Court is entrusted with the ability to provide equal justice through the use and interpretation of the law, hence, it also functions and a guardian in interpretation of the constitution (Charles, 2012). It is because of these very important functions that the Supreme Court is expected to carry out constitutional review in order to equalize the constitution with the major changes that have taken place... in the...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Supreme Court

...Supreme Court Supervisor June 27, Supreme Court The argument for an originalist perspective to interpretation of the constitution is rational because of the advantages that the theory offers to the contemporary and dynamic environment. The fact that no written constitution, or any other law, can anticipate and provide for all possibilities is one of the justifications for a non-originalist perspective. Laws, such as the constitutional amendments, were developed to remedy immediate and anticipated problems and transition through the amendments’ existence have realized developments, some of which are beyond expectations of the developers of the amendments. Relying on the letter of the amendments would therefore be retrogressive... Court...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Supreme Court

...Supreme Court case of Korematsu v. U.S Complaint The complaint in this case was that Korematsuwho was an American of Japanese descent was wrongfully evicted from his location to an internment camp. He complained that this violated his constitutional rights and hence refused to move as the order requested. This led to his arrest and conviction based on disloyalty and disobedience to the country and its laws. Brief summary of the facts At the peak of World War II, President Roosevelt signed a presidential executive order 9066 which demanded that all American-Japanese people be evacuated and taken into internment camps where they would be closely...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...which include, keeping check and balances on the US executive government. The American constitution empower the supreme court to check and correct the president’s actions. The US Supreme Court is considered to be the most elitist and least democratic institution of the US government This is because it is led by learned judges who are appointed and not elected into their lifetime positions. The supreme court is considered to be the least democratic because the judges are expected to keep checks and balances on the political government,...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Critically examining Stephen Harpers series of reforms his conservative federal government has introduced to the appointment processes for Section 96 and Supreme Court judges for FREE!

Contact Us