Labor Relations/Conclusion & Arbitration - Admission/Application Essay Example

Task: Labour Relations/Conclusion & Arbitration Conclusion The meeting held on 5th September 1990 set a platform for all parties to iron out important issues. It resolved that E-2 reports should never appear in Mr Hastings file unless he contravenes the regulations within one year. On the other hand, complaint from a parent might have triggered Principal Helen Frieman to add the report into his file. In as much as Mr Hasting talked the parent out of the complaint, the incident raised questions on the previous occurrence.

As such, he was to be held liable for any action of omission or commission. Concurrently, the employer failed to advise Roy Hastings on the threshold upon which an E-2 report is considered relevant hence violating Section A.1. Additionally, the principal violated section A.3 by not giving affair platform of investigation. Notably, she gave more attention to the complaint while not taking into account the results from Mr Hastings conversation with the parent. ResolutionMr Hasting is already a victim of the excessive authority from the principal who has violated Section A.

1, A, 2, and A, 3 respectively. In order to resolve the stalemate that can easily affect the present and future work relationship, the previous agreement made on September 5, 1990 should be upheld. The E-2 report should be expunged from Hastings personnel file. Thereafter, a fresh investigation is inevitable to ascertain three key facts including;1. Was Mr Hasting aware of section A.1 in the first and second incident?2. Was a fair investigation conducted during the second incident?3. Why did the principal not inform Mr Hasting during inclusion of E-2 form in the second incident?

After the investigation, a contractual agreement signed in the presence of the two parties and a union representative is necessary to prevent future occurrence of the same.