FDT response 1 week 3 - Essay Example

FDT response week 3 Question 3 Amexica geographical location covers fifty mile on every side of the 1900 mil USA and Mexico border stretching from the Pacific Coast at San Ysidro, CA/Tijuana, Mexico to the Gulf of Mexico at Brownsville, and TX/Matamoros. The area is characterized by high rate of crime, venality, murder, violence, merged legal and illegal economies thus openly negatively affecting the inhabitants, which correspondingly hinder its development (Rosenbaum & Friedman, 2007). Nevertheless, terror is exclusively the domain of the prevailing relatively shoddier, southern side of Amexica.

Amexica’s location has made it easier for exploitation of maquiladora employees and the corresponding border town economies by the corporation factories with union free, and cheap labor. Amexica is narco hubs that are marred by lawlessness thus making it to harbor signs of global capitalism (Rosenbaum & Friedman, 2007). Conversely, Amexica geography and the presence of the unlawful narcotics trade have aid in rising the standard of life and the elements of the sensitive culture such as music, clothing, and jewelry couple with consumer items such as fancy trucks, luxurious homes.

Amexica geography is strategic for gangs and drug cartels. Gangs normally abduct citizens of United States thus creating fear among the people. This massively hampers development of the area. Moreover, drug cartels occasionally hire Mexican Mafia, Texas Syndicate, and MS-13 as their own enforcers and supply of narcotics to the street (Rosenbaum & Friedman, 2007). This makes the location to be extremely insecure for investment thus hindering its entire development. ReferenceRosenbaum, E., & Friedman, S. (2007). The housing divide: How generations of immigrants fare in New Yorks housing market.

New York: New York University Press.