Plea-Bargaining and the Associated Advantages - Essay Example

Judges also derive similar benefits, as they can concentrate on more serious cases and reduce their workload. Defendants, however, derive the benefit of reduced sentences and the notion that the prosecution could still succeed in proving them guilty facilitates a decision for plea-bargaining. Fear of bias in the judicial process could also be a factor (Siegel & Worrall 202, 203).

Plea-bargaining does not serve justice to any stakeholder but only offers convenience to the overburdened criminal justice system. It only grants lenient charges to defendants, may force innocent defendants to plead guilty, and establish convenience for the prosecution and the judges, aspects that do not identify justice. Victims and society however suffer injustice as wrongs against them escape the necessary level of punishment (Siegel & Worrall 202, 203).

Plea-bargaining is therefore not fair because of the potential wrongful conviction and injustice that it offers to victims and society.

Response to the first post

Your post is precise and comprehensive to the prompts. The opinion on the possibility of a defendant escaping charges at trial, if the prosecution fails to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, is particularly outstanding. I believe it identifies justice in plea-bargaining for victims, especially in an environment where criminals could rely on wealth and brilliant lawyers as well as tampering with evidence to escape conviction.

Response to the second post

The post offers information on reasons for the high incidence of plea-bargaining such as time convenience for defendants and the prosecution and complexity in the prosecution’s burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt. The post, however, lacks precision and points are scarce in a multitude of words that are not incident to the prompt.