StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Alternative Dispute Resolution as an Inappropriate Misnomer - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Alternative Dispute Resolution as an Inappropriate Misnomer" highlights that the only difference between the mediator, arbitrator, and the private judge is that unlike the others the mediator does not “judge” the potency of either individual’s case. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.5% of users find it useful
Alternative Dispute Resolution as an Inappropriate Misnomer
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Alternative Dispute Resolution as an Inappropriate Misnomer"

Alternative Dispute Resolution’ is an inappropriate misnomer Introduction Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has been publicized as one of the best improvements in the contemporary legal system. In preference to using the fraught-laden litigation legal procedures, ADR allows litigants to take the more convenient, inexpensive, resourceful, less complex, less arduous, more participative, and more efficient method of solving disputes.1 These most common types of alternatives of litigation in ADR include mediation, appeasement, negotiation, and arbitration, and the like. Since the start of the 21st century, ADR methods have increasingly become of the norm, as parties and legal representatives and courts recognized that these methods could help the solution of disputes swiftly, economically, and more confidentially than conventional litigation methods. In ADR, the judge in charge of the proceedings often stays the trial and judgment until the individuals implicated in the dispute come up with a solution. The individuals implicated in the dispute liberally negotiate with each other, but if they fail to reach an agreement, the litigants can assert for a trial de novo2 (i.e. a trial that will assume that no court-annexed arbitration occurred between the conflicting individuals). The litigants presiding over the ADR proceedings can also opt to use private tribunals or rent-a-judge. ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution’ is an inappropriate misnomer Notwithstanding the fact that ADR has become a well-accepted shorthand for the huge cluster of non-litigation methods of dispute resolution, there has been claims that the term ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution’ is an inappropriate misnomer. This assertion is usually argued with the explanation that ADR fails to distinguish the sequence in which dispute resolution processes are used; and it fails to separate the adjudication processes from each other. In light of this proposition, this paper seeks to come up with patent primary and secondary sources to support the affiliated claims In matters regarding the sequence in which dispute resolution in ADR develops, it is imperative to mention that though some ADR methods are well established and regularly used, alternative dispute resolution has no preset definition. The term ‘alternative dispute resolution’ takes account of a huge array of non-litigation methods. Most of these methods have little in common except for the fact that all are alternatives for litigation methods of dispute resolution.3 Litigants, legal representatives, and adjudicators are incessantly modifying the existing ADR processes or formulating new ones so as to cater for the specific demands of their legal disputes. As a corollary, it has been argued that third parties who are involved in the proceedings of intractable disputes usually focus on making the ADR methods work in favor of cases rather than focusing on following a proper sequence of dispute resolution. Consequently, disputes solved through ADR follow very different stages of resolution. According to Ury, Brett, and Goldberg all methods of solving intractable, frequent or any other type of dispute whether ‘litigatory’ or ‘nonlitigatory’ should follow a set of four sequential stages.4 These four sequential stages include diagnosis of the dispute, design the most appropriate action to take, implementation of the action, and finally evaluation, diffusion and exit. These sequential stages were put in place to help third-party interveners in the elucidation of their roles in the proceedings of dispute resolution. Constantino and Merchant stipulate that the dispute resolution processes in ADR are problematic because they focus on specific disputes instead of the more essential systemic problems. ADR processes are focused on handling the disputes once they arise regardless of the method and sequence used, but Constantino and Merchant reckon that third-party interveners should focus the sequence and procedure followed so that a clear path can be set for future disputes, which will utilize the method used. 5 The sequential stages help third-party interveners such as litigants, legal representatives, and adjudicators to focus more on the process of designing dispute-resolution systems than the content. Drawing reference from these assertions, no single method of designing dispute-resolution systems whether ‘litigatory’ or ‘nonlitigatory’ should deviate from the preset sequential stages. However, most ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution’ techniques deviate from the preset sequential stages whereby they use the most appropriate course of action at the time. As a corollary, this paper argues that indeed the term ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution’ is an inappropriate misnomer; because it fails to distinguish the sequence in which dispute resolution processes are used. In matters regarding the claims that ADR fails to separate the adjudication processes from each other, this paper reckons that indeed the adjudication processes used in ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution’ lack the autonomy aspect thus have to be combined in order to solve a dispute. In order to justify this claim, several ADR techniques will be looked at (i.e. mediation, negotiation, court-annexed arbitration, and private judging) so as to establish how adjudication processes from other ADR techniques are replicated in the process of coming up with a solution for a dispute. To begin with, mediation has many aspects of negotiation, which is also another technique of ADR. Like negotiation, mediation is generally private, voluntary, and informal. Both of the techniques also put more emphasis on problem solving instead of determining who is right and who is wrong, and the individuals implicated in the dispute are the ones who decide the outcome.6 In addition, mediation, just like court-annexed arbitration and private judging involves the presence a neutral third party chosen by agreement to facilitate the individuals implicated in the dispute resolve the dispute. The mediator just like the arbitrator and private judge listens to each individual’s version of the predicament in an informal setting and facilitates an environment that enables the individuals to come up with ideas for resolving the dispute.7 Similarly, the mediator just like the arbitrator and private judge encourages each individual to comprehend and assess the interests of the other individual. The only difference between the mediator, arbitrator, and private judge is that unlike the others the mediator does not “judge” the potency of either individual’s case. Essentially, the mediator has no authority to enforce an outcome on the individuals implicated in the dispute.8 However, if a solution is not arrived at, the mediator refers the individuals to a private judge or an arbitrator and the entire process becomes a process of a combination of adjudication processes from other different ADR techniques. As a corollary, this paper argues that indeed the term ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution’ is an inappropriate misnomer because it fails to separate the adjudication processes from each other. References Armstrong, M. J. and Hurley, W. J. Arbitration Using the Closest Offer Principle of Arbitrator Behaviour. Mathematical Social Sciences. 43: 19-26. (2002). Brahm, E.and Ouellet, J. “Designing New Dispute Resolution Systems,” Beyond Intractability., Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA (2003) Constantino, C. and Merchant,C. Designing Conflict Management Systems: A Guide to Creating Productive and Healthy Organizations, London: Jossey-Bass Publishers (1996) Feinman, J. M. 1001 Legal Words You Need to Know. New York: Oxford University Press. (2003). Cheung, S. O. and Suen, C. H. A Multi-attribute Utility Model for Dispute Resolution Strategy Selection. Journal of Construction Management and Economics. 20(7): 557-568. (2002). Parrette, B. The Contract Disputes Act and the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act: A Richness of Remedies, Finally Ready for Trial?, 20 Pub. Con. L.J. 293 (1990). Ury, W. Bret, J. and Goldberg, S. Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict, London: Jossey-Bass Publishers (1988) Wenona V (Sto:lo Nation), Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Aboriginal Contexts: A Critical Review 11 (2007) (book review), available at http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/pdf/adrred_en.pdf. Accessed on 11 April 2014 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The term Alternative Dispute Resolution is an inappropriate misnomer, Essay”, n.d.)
The term Alternative Dispute Resolution is an inappropriate misnomer, Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1638568-the-term-alternative-dispute-resolution-is-an-inappropriate-misnomer-partly-because-it-fails-to-distinguish-the-sequence-in-which-dispute-resolution-processes-are-used-and-partly-because-it-fails-to-separate-the-adjudication-processes-from-each-ot
(The Term Alternative Dispute Resolution Is an Inappropriate Misnomer, Essay)
The Term Alternative Dispute Resolution Is an Inappropriate Misnomer, Essay. https://studentshare.org/law/1638568-the-term-alternative-dispute-resolution-is-an-inappropriate-misnomer-partly-because-it-fails-to-distinguish-the-sequence-in-which-dispute-resolution-processes-are-used-and-partly-because-it-fails-to-separate-the-adjudication-processes-from-each-ot.
“The Term Alternative Dispute Resolution Is an Inappropriate Misnomer, Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1638568-the-term-alternative-dispute-resolution-is-an-inappropriate-misnomer-partly-because-it-fails-to-distinguish-the-sequence-in-which-dispute-resolution-processes-are-used-and-partly-because-it-fails-to-separate-the-adjudication-processes-from-each-ot.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Alternative Dispute Resolution as an Inappropriate Misnomer

Alternative Dispute Resolution

The ultimate aim of this context is to examine the concept of alternative dispute resolution, types and advantages and disadvantages of ADRs.... alternative dispute resolution procedures are the optional ways of assisting individuals find solutions to legal problems before taking the matter to court.... According to the research findings, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) entails an independent third person termed as “neutral” whose function is to attempt to resolve or slim the areas of disagreement....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Can the concept of security be defined should it be

Can the concept of security be defined, should it be?... Abstract This essay analyses whether the concept of security can be or should be defined.... The analysis is conducted by reference to the debate on traditional concepts of security and the expansion of the concept of security which emerged in the post-Cold War era....
25 Pages (6250 words) Essay

Conflict management in a workplace

Therefore, workplace is something of a misnomer that company managers should highly consider to prevent occurrence of staff conflicts (Joyce 55).... These parties are however interdependent meaning that the conflict's resolution to be mutual satisfactorily, mutual effort must be in use (Hansen 59)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Alternative dispute resolution

alternative dispute resolution is also known as ADR processes.... In some last years alternative dispute resolution has obtained extensive popularity among both the general public and the legal profession.... Running head: alternative dispute resolution alternative dispute resolution College or or instructor name ... his article supports a theory that explains the alternative dispute resolution.... A large part of dispute resolution field is covered by alternative dispute resolution processes....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Lord Woolf's report also recommended a propensity towards alternative dispute resolution (ADR), with litigation as a last resort option12.... However, it has been propounded that “The satisfactory resolution of disputes is a key issue for any society5” and as such, “Litigation has traditionally been regarded as the dispute resolution procedure par excellence6”....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Alternative Dispute Resolution

From the paper "alternative dispute resolution" it is clear that in the conflict, the partners approach a business consultant who advises them on the implications of dissolving their partnership.... The decline in the reliability of the court system has increased the popularity of the alternative dispute resolution method (McHugh 56).... The court or the judicial system has remained as the most undisputed means of dispute resolution.... The successful negotiations in 1997 between the World Bank and the mining sector serve as a good illustration of the usefulness of mediation as a method of dispute resolution....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Alternative Dispute Resolution Assignment

Arbitration and mediation are among the most common types of alternative dispute resolution techniques (Redfern, Nigel and Martin 54).... Courts never dispute or overturn the Mediation and arbitration are applicable in different scenarios and have a number of advantages and disadvantages as the discussion below portrays....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Embracing Alternative Dispute Resolution

Lord Woolf's report also proposed that litigation should be seen as a last resort, embracing alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as a substitute to be encouraged by the courts9.... However, it has been propounded that 'The satisfactory resolution of disputes is a key issue for any society'.... Furthermore, Roney refers to Cowan Erwin's definition of ADR as 'any means of providing a resolution of a dispute between two or more parties which does not involve traditional adversarial procedures'11....
13 Pages (3250 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us