Bureaucratic Regulations and Guidelines - Essay Example

Critical Thinking Essay Assuming proposal 85 appears on a California ballot in future, I would vote against the proposal. The proposition needs to have a parental consent and notification before a minor pregnancy is terminated. Despite the parents concern on the life of their daughters, in a conventional setting, some of the teenagers come from background where they are not free with the parents. This normally arises in situations where by an instance of sexual abuse has happened in the past. In such cases, it is difficult for the child to seek help from the parents. This is attributed to the fear of being beaten, kicked out or even worse. The proposition forces the teenagers to delay their medical attention thereby suffering serious damages or consider committing suicide. Additionally, I would vote against the proposition since it puts the safety and health of the girls at stake. There is no single guideline that ensures good communication of a family. The only way that could minimize the issue of abortion and pregnancy is through caring, strong families and an outstanding sex education including abstaining, apparently not every teen live where there is a strong and caring family. Consequently, I would vote against the proposition since it places the vulnerable teenagers in a harmful position. When a pregnant and scared teenager is taken to an overcrowded court will bring more harm to her. Rather she requires a good Medicare and a qualified counsel for guidance. Therefore, the real mitigation to teenage pregnancy is through caring families. 2. The proposition has bureaucratic regulations and guidelines that do not guarantee that guardians are informed. It does not specify a person that will sign the mail, what will happen in case the mail delays, or if guardian are not at home, and if the teenage intercepts the letter. The propositions on my side only endanger the life our teens which can only be taken care of through a caring family. Additionally, the proposition does not protect the teens from the sexual predators and older men. There are already set up institutions that offer behavioral counseling and reporting illegal tasks and activities. Therefore, the proposition will not minimize the cases of teenage pregnancy and cannot force households to embrace communication because it is quite complex and unworkable and not confined on the predators. This will only put the teenagers at risk. Voting against means the teens will be safer and the freedom of choice will be protected. The proposition forces the teenagers to delay their medical attention thereby suffering serious damages or consider committing suicide. Additionally, I would vote against the proposition since it puts the safety and health of the girls at stake. There is no single guideline that ensures good communication of a family. The only way that could minimize the issue of abortion and pregnancy is through caring, strong families and an outstanding sex education. In summary, I would vote against the proposition because there is no single law that will ensure communication within a family. Subsequently, teenagers who are vulnerable cannot talk to their seniors: parents and guardians cannot navigate the courts that are overcrowded and may embark to illegal and dangerous abortions. The proposition will not stop predators, will not protect teens, and it will be the immediate step to overturn Roe and ban abortions. 3. My approach to the moderate stance came from consequential approach. I used consequentialism to determine the moral values of the proposition. Here, I used the proposition to argue that the proposition exposed the teenager to safety, moral, and health risks. The consequential approach is based on the fact that there is no single law that will guarantee good communication within a family framework. Therefore, the real answer to this problem is through caring, strong, and comprehensive education including abstaining. The approach helped me in determining the good and the bad side of the proposition before making a stand. From a consequentialist point of view, proposition 85 will instill suffering among teens, and therefore reduces happiness among them. But assuming the proposition promoted more happiness then I would be justified to support the proposition which is not the case. Whether or not the proposition is permissible will purely depend on the rate of providing details or generally assists in upholding morals in the society. Those who would vote for the proposition would have second thoughts assuming they were proved to be very effective. They argue on the basis that the proposition might produce good outcomes to offset the limitations that might accompany it. 4. Someone who might be for the proposition might argue his case on the fact that when the teen’s parents are involved and the teens denied accessing abortions without notification they will be more cautions in taking part in activities that might lead to pregnancy. Additionally, the internet predators and older men will be deterred from impregnating the teens when the abortions are stopped being made secret. Consequently, they believe that majority prefer the parental notification rules. They understand that the vulnerable: scared, pressured, abandoned and pregnant teens need support and advice from the counselor and parents. The opposes to my argument argue that parents and guardians have put a lot in raising their daughters, know their medical and personal history, and are more concerned about their daughters future than outsiders working at abortion clinics. Subsequently, the teenagers have rights to either refuse or agree an abortion, but their parents can assist them in understanding the options. Those for the proposition used a deontological approach in arguing their case. To them, they claimed that the proposition is good as an act. The act of parental notification, no matter the consequences, is good. Consequences irrespective of whether they are good or bad cannot justify being voted out. This is in effect to the point that the internet predators and older men will be deterred from impregnating the teens when the abortions are stopped being made secret. Consequently, they believe that majority prefer the parental notification rules. They understand that the vulnerable: scared, pressured, abandoned and pregnant teens need support and advice from the counselor and parents. Read More