Canadas Amnesty International - Essay Example

Amnesty International Introduction Canada’s Amnesty International (AI) focuses on equality assurance. The research delves on functions of AI and Canada’s AI functions. Canada’s AI reduces societal abuses. Social justice goals and the presence or absence of activities designed to work toward social justice. Amnesty International’s International Secretariat monitors and controls the global daily operations (Clark, 2010). Generally it provides leadership for more than 78 global AI locations. With an estimated 3,150,000 worldwide members, the agency touches lives of over 149 nations. AI continues to be successful in achieving its aim to reduce human rights abuses to allowable levels. In terms of the Canadian landscape, the international group has more than 2,900,000 supporters and members. The group had established branches in more than 148 nations. The group’s prime objective is to exert all efforts to end human rights abuses around the world. The international group’s basis is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as other human rights policies, statutes, and benchmarks. Canada’s AI harnesses the available global resources and ensures nations will increase implementation of the human rights of the nations’ inhabitants. Attention paid to class, race and gender in the organization’s policies and operation. The Canadian AI group espouses equality. Equality includes offering equal opportunities to persons of different classes to achieve their goals and dreams in life. Equality includes offering equal chances to individuals from different races to prosper in life. The council supervises the International executive committee. There are more than 80 AI offices strategically located in many countries around the world (Clark, 2010). Furthermore, the AI’s Canada Branch has its local executive committee. The committee oversees the Montreal branch and the Ottawa branch. The branch has more than 79,999 members. The group advocates for better treatment of prisoners. AI –Canada was able to gather more than $11,250,000 funds during 2011 alone. An estimated 44 percent of the money was funneled to the conducting of researches, missions, and reports, worldwide campaigns, trial observers, and helping other global agencies such as the United Nations achieve their own set of predefined goals and objectives. The key ingredients to AI’s Canadian branches are open membership, measurable goals, program evaluations, evolution, and efficiency-related itineraries (Clark, 2010). Race. In the work force, one article states that the nonwhite workers greatly suffered from work discrimination policies (Baines, 2008). The work responsibilities were normally classified as white jobs and non-white jobs. AI should increase its current efforts to reduce human rights abuses. For example, the AI must focus on reversing the race issue covering up the issue of job title or job responsibilities (Clark, 2010). Gender. Under the corporate ethics theory, AI group should require its line and staff employees to prioritize the full and enthusiastic implementation of the corporate ethics. The same AI employees should do their best to attaining the organizational goals and objectives at all costs. Costs include relegating the gender needs of the employees. Canada’s AI spearheads women’s roles as limited due to the male-dominated (patriarchal) society (Clark, 2010). Not a personal thought. The high membership database is due to lenient membership requirements. The membership is open to anyone who is interested to join. If the membership requirements were more stringent, the current list of members will surely declines some individuals cannot comply with stringent membership requirements (Clark, 2010). The idea of hegemony. People join organizations to improve their current economic standings in the community (Mills, Simmons, & Mills, 2005). The idea of hegemony states that the corporate culture is geared towards repression, domination, and hegemonic continuing of the elite group (Ogbor, 2001). The AI group opposes repression, domination, and hegemonic trimmings normally espoused by most profit-oriented organizations. In normal profit-prioritize groups, the elite group represses and dominates its line and staff employees and the entire community. The normal corporate goal is the social and political domination of the nonwhite population. Counter of hegemony. To counter hegemony, the AI leaders’ policies should be to refuse compliance with income-prioritized corporate morality. The members of the international group should band together to form viably diverse groups. With strength in numbers, the members of the Amnesty group can force its management officers to grant diversity in the workplace. The people should not implement the corporate policies by making the employees voice their desire for work diversity in terms of gender, ethnicity, and race. With diversity, management can maximize the diverse strengths of line and staff employees from different gender, race, and ethnicity (Mills, Simons, & Mills, 2005). Alternative ways to deliver services. There are alternative ways to AI’s quality human rights services. One of the more popular ways to deliver services is to focus to pinpointing the business problems, obstacles, or bottlenecks to attaining the preset organizational goals and objectives. After finding the significant problems, obstacles or bottlenecks, the line and staff employees must immediately set into motion the different operations strategies that will solve the problems, obstacles, or bottlenecks. To generate better results, AI group members should do their best to reduce time required to complete the international group’s assigned tasks (Clark, 2010). Issues that need to be addressed. The AI group should focus on increasing the penalty and other corrective issues to curb human rights violations. With higher penalties, the culprits will have to pay higher fines, suffer from longer incarceration, and other harsher punishments. The group should also encourage more individuals to join the group. With more group members, AI will have more strength in numbers (Clark, 2010). What needs to happen to create an atmosphere of change. In an atmosphere of change, one of the things that need to happen for equality to climb several notches higher in the world environment, the government leaders should do their share to eradicate human rights abuses in the workplace. To do so, the government leaders must include making the workplace and the community more comfortable for the gay men and lesbian women. In 2005, Canada had legally approved same sex marriages (Clark, 2010). Power bureaucracies. The AI organization has many power bureaucracies. Karl Marx reiterated that capitalism directly influences bureaucracy (Mills, Simmons, & Mills, 2005). Each country is assigned one bureaucracy. Consequently, Canada has its own local AI bureaucracy. The Canada group is composed of more than 795,000 members. The Canada Bureaucracy is divided into two distinct groups. One of Canada Bureaucracies is the French-speaking Montreal group. The other group is the English speaking Ottawa group. The Executive monitors, manages, and monitors the activities of the two groups (Clark, 2010). Positives of the organization. AI of Canada has many positives. Being one of our current world’s most popular and credible human rights entity, the entity prioritizes curtailing human rights abuses on all fronts. The entity is known for its credibility and reliability. The entity significantly curves human rights abuses (Clark, 2010). First, the organization engages in social work activities. Social work entails the making client referrals, assesses the current availability of scare human rights-related resources, establishes viable social support systems, and proposes programs that will make the life of all human beings, especially the downtrodden, abused, and disenfranchised citizens of society, especially in Canada, better. AI (Canada) implements a social work program that harnesses responsive government and other third party resources to reduce human rights abuses and other unfavorable predicaments of the abused members of Canadian society (Hardcastle & Wenocur, 2004). Social policy. Overall, AI is an effective organization in bringing awareness and researching human rights violations around the world. Their enormous membership is their strength in mobilizing people. AI of Canada humanitarian group has been very successful in reducing human rights abuses and uplifting the lives of disadvantaged Canadian residents. The Canadian humanitarian group incorporates the social work framework to achieve its local human rights goals. The framework includes implementing a set of cognitive, analytic, and sorting skills. The framework also includes the successful affirmation of selected third parties’ commitments to help the humanitarian group reduce the sufferings of the Canadian residents (Hardcastle, 2011). Conclusion. Summarizing the above discussion, Canada’s Amnesty International (AI) prioritizes equality in society. Amnesty International reduces abuses. AI improves conditions of work. Evidently, Canada’s Amnesty International significantly lessens the abuses of the world’s society. References: Baines, D. (2008). Race, Resistance, and Structuring: Emerging Skills in the New Social Services. Social Work , 53 (2), 123-131. Clark, A. (2010). Diplomacy of Conscience: Amnesty International and Changing Human Rights Norms. New York. University Press. Hardcastle, D. (2011). Community: Practice: Theories and Skills for Social Workers: Theories and Skills for Social Workers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hardcastle, D., & Powers, P. (2004). Community Practice. Oxford : Oxford University Press. Mills, A., Simmons, T., Mills, J., (2005). Reading organizational theory: A critical approach to the study of organizational behavior and structure. Toronto: Garamond Press. Ogbor, J. (2001). Critical Theory and the Hegemony of Corporate Culture. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 14 (6), 590-608. Read More