Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1592656-indeterminate-sentence-and-parole-major-criticisms
https://studentshare.org/law/1592656-indeterminate-sentence-and-parole-major-criticisms.
Indeterminate Sentence and Parole Major Criticisms A number of criticisms have propelled some s to discard parole and indeterminate sentence. They would rather recommend sure and non lengthy imprisonment terms. Parole boards and judges have a lot of discretion, which has led to abhorrently inequitable punishments. Parole boards operate capriciously in establishing concrete dates of release, and determining the criterion for release (Pert, 1999, p. 495). The indeterminate sentence establishment would be termed as fallacious.
The main central of it is that neither rehabilitation nor criminal sanctions’ cardinal purpose is the attainable goal. The attainable and suitable aim of justice supported is punishment. Correctional officials have clinched indeterminate sentence outside their intractable desire to regulate the convicts’ behavior, and that is both evil and hypocritical. Effect of the indeterminate sentence can be partly viewed to be overcrowding in prisons. The rehabilitation model’s hypocrisy, disparate sentence, non volitional participation in programs by prisoners, and irrational and unpredictable paroling decisions all pilot to unrest, violence, and prison alienation.
In my view, I would support abolition of both parole and indeterminate sentence. Indeterminate sentence presents disparate sentences obligated for similar crimes. Those disparities reflect socioeconomic and racial prejudices. Indeterminate sentence and parole require more supervision time costs regarding the administration, yet they do not satisfy the retributive sentiments of the public. As earlier mentioned, indeterminate sentence causes overcrowding in prisons which may easily result into disease outbreaks in the prison; this is a punishment to human healthy rather than a way of rectifying their behavior.
Parole requires enormous expenses due to incompetence and corruption within the system. In addition, there is inaccurate knowledge of those who would be previously convicted. Reference: Pert, J. (1999). Parole and Prisoner Reentry in the United States. Crime and Justice, 26, 479-529.
Read More