Late Stage Abortion - Essay Example

Late stage abortion Is late stage abortion right or wrong? Late stage or late term abortion commonly known as voluntary abortion is the termination of the embryo or fetus from the uterus before it is viable in order to end pregnancy. In most cases, it is carried out in the late stages of pregnancy. What are the morals concerned with the rules and principles of right conduct or differentiation between right and wrong? Late stage abortion is morally wrong because it brutalizes the person who performs the act and deprives or denies the fetus right to live.

Killing a person denies them opportunities to their experiences, projects, activities and enjoyment that would have made the future of the aborted fetus. What makes this abortion worse is the fact that the victim is not only denied experiences and projects but there are some other things, which the aborted fetus cannot enjoy now but would have experienced them in future, which the fetus is denied or deprived of. It is correct to kill unborn babies because it deprives them of their future. Late stage abortion is actually wrong because logical arguments that surround it are about human rights.

Some people claim that a woman has a right to privacy, entitled to her own decisions and act or behave in accordance to her own body to be carried out in terms of protection. However, when it comes to her committing an issue such as late stage abortion, their actions may be questioned (Kaczor 44-46). Life thinkers or people state that even the unborn babies have the right to be protected. The main argument here is that unborn babies in the late stage of pregnancy are fully developed to a level of psychological intricacy at which thinking or reasoning can take place.

Therefore, there is no need whatsoever that the unborn child ought not be treated as human beings or persons and should be acknowledged and recognized as having human rights (Baird 67). There are two conflicting events in this scenario; whereby the women has the right to act to her own body and right to privacy but in this case where two individuals rights are not in agreement, they must be measured in balance not to act in veil of ignorance in neglecting the rights of the other party like the case of Gonzalez versus Carhart.

In such cases, after careful consideration of the rights of the two parties, it clear that giving room for one party to avoid getting engaged in the intimate matters of the other party is not a rational choice. Babies at late stage of development should be treated as persons when in any are born prematurely. Not doing so to the unborn babies is not ethically right. The fetus at this stage of development deserves their rights based because they are persons. Such abortion is wrong because they are morally wrong in that they go against human rights or violate human rights (Kaczor 64).

The other question that burns is that what determines human rights? Is it God, science or the government? Nature provides us with human rights in that they are a product of human reason and emotional feeling that develop and grows when people interact and need platform for their interaction. Most women who get late stage abortion would not give in to abortions because of moral basis like the case of Roe versus Wade. Abortion is wrong because every human being hold to the fact life is sacred and ought to be respected and worthy of protection, then it is rational to argue that abortion or termination of life at late stage is wrong since the fetus is alive just like other born persons.

People in society need to gain more respect and appreciation for life. It does not matter how small especially life that was created with consent (Baird 36-38). All life is very significant and special and this is the only life that fetus has to lie so why intentionally take the life of that unborn baby? The fetus in late stage of development t is a person with rights, therefore, in this manner; abortion is regarded as murder though in some instances, abortion is acceptable with regard to the autonomy of the woman’s body.

However, it will be unethical for women to abort at this later stage unless the pregnancy is completed and the life of the mother is at stake. In addition, the women has obligation to the baby because during sex she gave in to it and avoided using contraception to ward off pregnancy. Works Cited Baird, Robert. The Ethics of Abortion: Pro-life Versus Pro-choice. New York: Prometheus Books, 2001. Print. Kaczor, Christopher. The Ethics of Abortion: Women’s rights, Human Life and the Question of Justice.

New York: Routledge, 2010. Print.