Applications of Mens Rea and Juvenile Culpability: Roper v. Simmons (2005) & Atkins v. Virginia (2002) - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Apparently, the prosecution in a majority of criminal law cases is supposed to adduce evidence that incriminates the accused beyond…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.2% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Applications of Mens Rea and Juvenile Culpability: Roper v. Simmons (2005) & Atkins v. Virginia (2002)"

Download file to see previous pages In juvenile criminal law, developments in the cases of Atkins v. Virginia (2002), Roper v. Simmons (2005) and Stanford v. Kentucky (1989) provide different perspectives on the decisions made regarding juvenile mens rea amidst age restriction considerations.
Kevin Stanford was 17 years of age in 1981 when he shot and killed Barbel Poore before committing other criminal offenses on the diseased in the company of an accomplice which included robbery, rape and sodomy. It was held that the sensitivity of the crimes warranted the transfer of the trial out a juvenile court and the accused was convicted of murder and other first degree crimes as committed. Stanford was found guilty and sentenced to a death sentence as well as extra 45 years of imprisonment. The Kentucky Supreme Court withheld the earlier court death sentence despite the unordinary conviction as an adult while he was still a minor during the commission of the crime. In the decision, the court cited the correctness of the court hearing the original case in trying the juvenile appellant as an adult due to the lack of demonstration that there was chance of rehabilitation in the juvenile justice system. The gravity of the offenses defied the age of the offender and the mens rea factor formed the conviction of the courts’ decisions amidst contestations from groups citing violation of the Eight Amendment barring cruel and unusual punishment (Champion, 2005).
Daryl Atkins was 18 years old in 1996 when under the influence of alcohol and marijuana, he committed a murder and other criminal offenses in the company of an accomplice. The accused juveniles abducted Eric Nesbitt before murdering him with an intention of stealing from him but on finding that he only a little money in his wallet, they forced him to an ATM to withdraw more money. Enough incriminating evidence of abduction and brutality against ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Applications of Mens Rea and Juvenile Culpability: Roper v. Simmons Essay”, n.d.)
Applications of Mens Rea and Juvenile Culpability: Roper v. Simmons Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1580010-applications-of-mens-rea-and-juvenile-culpability-roper-v-simmons-2005-atkins-v-virginia-2002
(Applications of Mens Rea and Juvenile Culpability: Roper V. Simmons Essay)
Applications of Mens Rea and Juvenile Culpability: Roper V. Simmons Essay. https://studentshare.org/law/1580010-applications-of-mens-rea-and-juvenile-culpability-roper-v-simmons-2005-atkins-v-virginia-2002.
“Applications of Mens Rea and Juvenile Culpability: Roper V. Simmons Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1580010-applications-of-mens-rea-and-juvenile-culpability-roper-v-simmons-2005-atkins-v-virginia-2002.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Applications of Mens Rea and Juvenile Culpability: Roper v. Simmons (2005) & Atkins v. Virginia (2002)

Henry V

..., was furious by this proud claim and formally declared war to England. So Henry V was not the one who made the allegation to the French throne; he only continued the demand of his ancestor, Edward, which began the war in the first place. Also, the movie shows the two nations supposedly living in peace with each other before the affirmation of Edward, when in reality the two nations were in the state of a long-lasting warfare. For the next 52 years the war raged with both countries having their victories and losses. Some truces were signed, but the conflict was still not resolved. By 1389, both sides were exhausted with an enormous loss of men and the death of skilled troops and war leaders, including...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Florida v. Harris and Florida v. ardines

...? Critical Thinking Assignment: Florida v. Harris Florida v. Jardines Introduction Consistent in all global legislative systems, legal cases are initially sought out in lower and trial courts. Subsequently, the decisions are appealed and challenged in higher courts such as Supreme Court. Various concurring and dissenting opinions are revealed during the hearings of the cases and all circumstances are carefully accounted for before reaching final conclusion. References to past legal cases are very critical as situations of most of the cases resemble to those in older ones. This paper entails a detailed discussion and critical analysis of two separate legal cases which have mutually similar circumstances....
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Criminal Law Mens Rea

.... The general rule with both common law and statutory offences is for the prosecution to prove every ingredient of the actus reus and the corresponding ingredient of mens rea. This is a general presumption against strict liability unless clearly intended by the Parliament. It is assumed that full mens rea is required and only in the existence of special factors that justify an exception that the courts can treat an ingredient of actus reus as strict.7 The case law of Sweet and Parsley8 set this doctrine of presumption and this is consonant with the supremacy of the Parliament and the view that criminal conduct is based on fault which, in turn, is equated to...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Criminal law- Actus Rea and Mens Rea

...Criminal Law- Actus Rea and Mens Rea Mens Rea is described as "A guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent; Guilty knowledge and willfulness". (Encyclopedia of Crime & Justice, 2002) In criminal law it is the basic principle that a crime consists of a mental element and a physical element. A person's awareness of the fact that his or her conduct is criminal is the mental element, and 'Actus Reas' (the act itself) is the physical element. The concept of Mens Rea started its development in the 1600s in England when judges started to say that an act alone could not...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Mens Rea

...Mens Rea Its funny how a simple thought can be one's own undoing. I have viewed plenty of true crime shows and listened to various experts pontificate about the intent level of a crime having a substantial impact on the degree of the crime charged. It all sounded like a bunch of mumbo jumbo to me and frankly, compelled me to turn the channel. I always thought that an "intent level" applied to measuring the difference between the death penalty and life without parole. How wrong I was indeed I was sitting in a caf sipping on my latte' on a summer morning in mid June, when I observed a gentlemen. He was perhaps in his early thirties medium height and bearded face. What stood out to me at the moment was...
4 Pages(1000 words)Personal Statement

Roper v. Simmons

...were denied at all levels. After Simmons’ had exhausted all appeals, the Supreme Court ruled in another case that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit the execution of a mentally retarded person (Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 302 (2002)). When Simmons became aware of this ruling, he submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and requested post-conviction relief based on the assertion that the reasoning of Atkins established a Constitutional protection against the death penalty for a convicted individual who was a minor when the crime was committed. The Supreme Court of Missouri agreed with...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

JUvenile Death Penalty

...was sentenced to death. A succession of appeals to both state and federal courts ended in 2002; however, every appeal was rejected. Afterwards, the Missouri Supreme Court in 2002 maintained the execution of Simmon while the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that putting the mentally ill to the death row is a violation of the Eight and 14th Amendment ruling out on harsh and unusual punishment since a large portion of Americans regarded it harsh and unusual, the Missouri Supreme Court determined to re-evaluate the case of Simmon (Fagan, 2005). Basing from the justifications in the Atkins case, the Missouri concluded that the decision of the U.S....
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Roe v. Wade or Miranda v. Arizona

...was not reminded of his privilege to remain quiet and other legitimate privileges? (Cross & Miller, 164). These questions were answered in the ‘Miranda v. Arizona1, a milestone judgment by U.S Supreme Court which held that anyone accused of a crime had “the privilege to remain silent.” Thus, Supreme Court verdict is being referred as ‘Miranda Warning’ that is being applicable every individual who is arrested in U.S.A. Further, Miranda case also unveiled the privileges of the defendant, especially in criminal cases. (Cross & Miller, 164). Fifth Amendment to U.S Constitution offers to safeguard against the self-accusation and a right to have a counsel during police questioning of an accused is...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

R v Hayter [2005]

... husband (House of Lords, Session 2004 – 2005, 2005). All the defendants were convicted of murder by the jury. In his appeal, Hayter contended that the judge had erred in law by directing the jury that if they convicted Ryan of murder, then they could employ their finding that Ryan was the murderer, as evidence in the case against Hayter. The latter also relied on the ground that the judge had erred in law by not withdrawing the case from the jury, when the Crown’s case was closed (Regina v Hayter, 2005). The court ruled that in a joint trial involving defendants for a joint offence, the jury could use their findings of one of the defendants’ guilt, which was entirely founded on that defendant’s out of court statement, as a fact... made...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Actus Reus and Mens Rea

...an offense that is actually absent or unreal is that to punish him/her would be to punish for thoughts by itself. Reasons Law Requires Mens Rea Generally, the mental prerequisites necessary for conviction of a crime is important relative, for example, to the mental prerequisites for culpability in tort law (Clarkson, 2005). The charging of criminal culpability necessitates ‘mens rea’, such as consciousness of not just one’s own actions but also the presence of the pertinent situations and the likelihood that adverse consequences can arise from the action. Usually, ‘mens rea’ is...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Applications of Mens Rea and Juvenile Culpability: Roper v. Simmons (2005) & Atkins v. Virginia (2002) for FREE!

Contact Us