Nobody downloaded yet

John Rawls's Principles of Justice - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
In the paper “John Rawls's Principles of Justice” the author determines if John Rawls's principles of justice should begin with the “maximin” assumption in a community. His two principles of justice were derived on his part only as a thought experiment…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.3% of users find it useful
John Rawlss Principles of Justice
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "John Rawls's Principles of Justice"

Download file to see previous pages Rawls objective of A Theory of Justice, published in 1971, was to provide an alternative solution to the then-dominant utilitarian principle of justice, which held that, a society is “right and morally just,” if major institutions maximized what is intrinsically good, to the satisfaction of the vast majority of people in a society (Ibid: 21). In rejecting the utilitarian principle of utility, Rawls set forth his conception of justice, which was egalitarian in nature.
It would perhaps be helpful to look at some definitions of justice, before analyzing Rawls's conception of justice. The dictionary of legal theory defines justice as the set of moral and political constraints on human interactions (Bix, 2004: 108). There have been significant debates about the nature and source of standards of justice, and some skeptical thinkers argued that standards of justice were grounded only in the conventional views of society, or in a community's traditions (Ibid: 108). Other theories viewed the principles of justice as a general agreement among people under certain ideal conditions. A traditional view of justice described standards that are eternal and unchangeable, established by God, the nature of the universe, human nature, or some combination of these (Ibid). D.D.Raphael (2001:1), a theorist of justice, recognized justice as a complex concept that pervaded social thought and is basic to law, ethics, and politics alike (Raphael:1). The first part of this principle is better known as the “difference principle,” while the second part is called the “equal opportunity principle.” While the idea of equal opportunity could be easily explained, the difference principle has drawn much controversy among political theorists. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(John Rawls's Principles of Justice Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1849 words, n.d.)
John Rawls's Principles of Justice Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1849 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1561141-should-priciples-of-justice-in-a-community-begin-with-the-maximin-assumption-evident-in-john-rawls-work-a-theory-of-justice
(John Rawls'S Principles of Justice Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1849 Words)
John Rawls'S Principles of Justice Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1849 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1561141-should-priciples-of-justice-in-a-community-begin-with-the-maximin-assumption-evident-in-john-rawls-work-a-theory-of-justice.
“John Rawls'S Principles of Justice Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1849 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1561141-should-priciples-of-justice-in-a-community-begin-with-the-maximin-assumption-evident-in-john-rawls-work-a-theory-of-justice.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF John Rawls's Principles of Justice

Michael Sandel's critique of John Rawls' Theory of Justice

...? Michael Sandel's critique of John Rawls' Theory of Justice Sandel’s thoughts on Liberalism and the Limits of Justice are the most comprehensive and extensive critique of John Rawls’s Theory of Justice. Sandel has a good understanding of Rawls’s views and therefore his analysis of the theory of justice is thorough with the challenges it poses on political philosophy. Michaels challenge is not perfect and it also has errors, his critique of Rawls is not as wrong as he assumes. He claims that Rawls theory is weak for presupposing an already existing...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

John Rawls: A Theory of Justice

...If you were one of the people given the job of designing a "conception of Justice" for a society in which you would choose to live, what would you expect of that society in terms of fairness and justice? Can you possibly construct an ideal society without factoring in your own special circumstances, such as your gender, race, ethnicity, social status, level of privilege, of level of education? Rawls wants to factor those issues out of the process. Can you do that? Can anyone? If not, can any system of justice be fair? Given the rare privilege of designing a “conception of justice”, I would profess to weave a justice system that keeps...
2 Pages(500 words)Term Paper

Social Contract Theory by John Rawls

...Social Contract Theory by John Rawls Teachings received religiously act as ethical standards of people’s foundation. This means that, if an act is unethical for people, then nobody should resolve to undertake it, regardless of the consequences. However, people can also derive ethical standards based on a concept of duty from philosophical principles. John’s social contract theory furnishes a very vital example of formalism that influences thinking about personal ethics. This theory concerns itself with systems of establishing a way that people can use to construct a just society given the many inequalities in wealth, social status, and knowledge. Social contract theory...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

In A Theory of Justice, John Rawls

...?A Theory of Justice The nature of justice has been considered since at least Greek antiquity. Philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle contributed significantly to this area of investigation. Throughout the centuries other thinkers have added insights. Notably, John Stuart Mille advanced the notion of utilitarianism where the proper approach is to advance one’s happiness, while refraining from doing harm. Emmanuel Kant considered the categorical imperative wherein one should only engage in actions as long as they could be extended to all members of society. John Rawls, in his Theory of Justice, proposed the idea of the veil of ignorance....
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Rawls A theory of Justice

..., with same amount of hardwork. In real world it is not possible to create such ideal form of equality for the reason, that inequalities are often passed from one generation to another in the shape of wealth and property, and continued to next generation is successive cycles. Reference Rawl, J. (1972). Theory of justice. : Oxford University Press Stone, R. (2004). Textbook on civil liberties and human rights. : Oxford University Press. Simpson, B. (2001). Human rights and the end of empire. : Oxford University Press. John A. Edgren. (1995). On the Relevance of John Rawls's Theory of Justice to Welfare Economics. Review of Social...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Rawls Theory of Justice

...John Rawls was an American philosopher (February 21, 1921 - November 24, 2002), he wrote one of the most famous books in the 1971 also it widely reading of political philosopher and this book is a Theory of justices in this book Rawls tries to address the real meaning of distributive justice through the classical philosopher model of social contract and other philosopher tries to do this is Kant. However, Rawls in concept of distributive justice goes further in hypothesizing the justice theory under the justice as fairness. The justice as fairness has two principle to drive the following Rawlsian principles of justice the first one is that the liberty principle and the second is the difference principle. Furthermore, in the theory... that...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Comparative Analysis of John Rawls Justice as Fairness and Irving Kristols A Capitalist Conception of Justice

.... It is ironic then that Irving Kristol accuses the “social justiceprinciples as utopian. The two principles proposed by John Rawls form an incontrovertible compact for basing social arrangements. After all, who would contest a proposal for equal political rights. And where unequal wealth, power or privilege exists, it is with the consent of the rest of the society. Also, the positions of power and privilege are open to all members of the society and such an inequality is created on collective consensus in order for the entire community to benefit. As mentioned before, John Rawls’ proposed...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

John Rawls' Theory of Justice

...is the basis in which people can live in harmony and is necessary because humans are social animals and the absence of any social contract will tend to destroy any society as there will be deviants in it. A theory of justice as propounded and conceptualized by John Rawls depends on two things: the original position which is highly hypothetical in that the principles of justice are selected and implemented from his so-called “veil of ignorance” in which people lack any ulterior aim or motive and therefore presumed to act in the best interests of everybody in that society. In his theory, the original position assumes everyone starts out being equal...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Research entry on John Rawls

... John Rawls And His Contributions A remarkable and incandescent personality in the history of American philosophy is John Bordley Rawls. Rawls was an intensely inspiring figure and won over the hearts of those close to philosophy. Rawls, who was truly an asset for America, was born on February 21, 1921 (Iep.utm.edu 1). He was blessed with the ornaments of philosophy in the areas that dealt with human character. He was also a privilege for American politicians of all times due to his broad based knowledge on politics. Rawl kept spreading his word in every horizon of United States of America, until 2002. On November 24, 2002, the entire American nation encountered the sad demise of John Bordley Rawls. Rawls acquired his dignified... ...
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper

A Theory of Justice by John Rawls

...1.) In his work, A Theory of Justice (1971), John Rawls posits two principles of justice. Rawls’ first principle of justice is predicated upon liberty. In his first principle, he explains that each individual has an equal right to a comprehensive system of basic liberties that correspond to a similar system for all citizens.1 He argues that each person should have the greatest amount of liberty that is compatible with equal levels of liberty for all people. According to Rawls, the most important commodity is liberty and if an individual lacks the freedom to pursue their...
9 Pages(2250 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic John Rawls's Principles of Justice for FREE!

Contact Us