Psychological Profiling: Crime Scene Assessment - Case Study Example

Topic: Psychological Profiling Crime Scene Assessment: Case Murder of Jane Smith Case explanation: This case study rotates around a young woman named Jane Smith who was twenty-seven years of age and worked as a librarian in a recognized library situated in close proximity to her residence. Jane resided with her parents in a calm residential area close by the Bletchingham market. Furthermore, Jane had a steady relationship with her boyfriend named Mark Jones who worked as an accountant in a committee office close by the library she worked in; they were also scheduling to get married and get established in jointly after four months of her desertion and were already engaged. It has been reported that Jane was last seen on 24th May 2008 on Wednesday, wearing blue denim jeans corresponding up with a blue and white striped sweater, red court shoes and a complementary shoulder bag with her credit cards and mobile phone inside it. She was also tiring tights, bra and knickers inside her clothes, which were found at the place where the corpse was exposed. She went misplaced the night she had gathering plans with her group of friends at a close by bar and the Police spoke to all her friends concerning the entrance of Jane Smith at the appointment place and her friends learned saying that Jane was supposed to make it to the pub as planned at somewhere around eight or nine pm and she would always enlighten her friends if she was to get any late for the get-together. The dead body was found at Water ship Common which is a locality about fifteen miles away from her house and where a fire was reported on 17th July, 2008 on Thursday, and since the fire was located just thirty yards away from the road people around the area were apprehensive that the fire could get out of hands but earlier than it was too late the authorities came and took concern of it and that is when the dead body of Jane Smith was exposed harshly charred and without any clothes on. DNA and dental assessment were the only firm evidences through which it was recognized as Jane Smith's body for the reason that the entire body was burnt with the head covered by a charred piece of cardboard and the base of the fire was the lower abdominal part and the genital parts of the dead body. A green scarf was also exposed right underneath the cardboard covering the head also and after the assessment of the head area the neck was inspected and which was exposed tied around compactly with a pair of tights along with a number of metal eyeholes all about the body and the over all state of the dead body looked like to some extent a canvas covering. There were no accommodations done to obscure the body along with its surroundings that were chiefly open woodland and un-destroyed views of the complete area through the neighbouring road. The state of the body predicts a very weird behavioural pattern when it comes to the executioner and perhaps we can prognosticate that the killer could have been in a very choleric and pitiless state of mind. For illustration, we often hear about harshly killed young girls which also involves a progression of deaths in the same patterning or method and mostly the offenders are eccentric stalkers who are one way or another fanatical with raping and ultimately killing these girls. In this case the kind of crime is perhaps premeditated murder which can be predicted from side to side the condition of the body that clearly states that the girl was either kidnapped first or willingly taken to this location followed by corporeal harm or torture and then ultimately the place was burnt down with the exercise of petrol all over the consign and body. Rational Result: The stipulation of the body makes it safe to finish that the girl was perhaps intentionally kidnapped or mugged on the street then taken to the place and physically abused and then ultimately burnt down so that all the evidences including the major one that of the body can disappear and probably for the reason that the criminal planned on departure no mark at the back. The Police exposed the red shoes comparable to the ones explained by Jane's parents and friends in a trash bin on a road that was a straight route from the central bus station to the appointment bar which explains that the criminal either followed this girl or kidnapped her long before she could essentially reach the bar and ultimately took her down to this location as a part of the programme or by coincidence. It was revealed that there was no CCTV exposure of that particular area but there was a camera point which was on the same street of the locality but surprisingly the camera was taken away a week before for repairing purposes which is either a accident or a purposeful effort to wipe out every confirmation probable. Appropriate Exploratory techniques: Even though, the authorities examined the most excellent way that one can probably in a circumstances where the condition of the body is completely unidentifiable however there was still a capacity of better examination when it comes to the accurate location which should be preserved till the time the case is determined or either closed down. The examination of the neighbouring areas and particularly the people living there could have supported in achievement of evidence and conceivably the owner of the location where it all happened could have helped them in figuring out or at least getting a speck earlier to the criminal. The authorities that took concern of the camera coverage through out the spot should be investigated since there is an opportunity that any one of them could have assisted the criminal in a way that the scrupulous camera that covered the road where the crime took place was one way or another removed. Fingerprints on the red shoes should have been scanned and examined if there is any which can establish to be a major step towards the recognition of the criminal. Over all the only feasible approaches for further examination could have been through the charred body parts, questioning of the people surrounding that location, the owner of the location (governmental or privately owned), fingerprint tests through the red shoes revealed, further questioning of her friends and connections or family members and last but positively not the least through the contacts in her mobile phone and credit card receipts and the past or any other evidences if the shoulder bag was bared during the investigation. Feasible Interpretations: The most feasible interpretations of the complete scenario can be done only through systematic examination and how strong are the evidences found because the stronger the proof is the closer we can get to the criminal. On the other hand, the complete situation if put in a theoretical understanding can include that the girl was followed by the criminal either since she left her home or she was stalked by somebody since sometime to really figure out her daily schedule so that he can carry out the plan at an appropriate time. We can say that the girl was kidnapped or taken away to this place previous to she could essentially reach to the bar and she was physically harmed sooner than she was burnt down and the burning down of the entire situate was done out of lack of confidence and fear of being tracked down. The criminal dumped the red shoes in the trash bin on the way back so that no one can recognize these shoes and probably because his fingerprints were on them. Case 2: Valerie and John Case explanation: The case of Valerie and John chiefly focuses on the kind of affiliation they share together that is actually quite insulting from John's end and the way he treats Valerie is somewhat humiliating. People who are familiar with the couple have reported that John typically abuses Valerie by both vocal and physical ways. Vocal abuse includes humiliating remarks over Valerie's look and threats of reprimand to her in personal if she did not pay attention to him. While physical abuse includes kicking, hitting on the face, assault her with a base ball bat, actually harming her by closing the car door on her, forcing her face to harsh nettles, gripping her into a car boot with dogs and throwing a spanner at her. Associates observed that Valerie was in some ways compelled towards never retaliating back at him during attacks and these acts of abuse generally occurred as an appearance of John's own frustrations and pre-conceived thinking that surrounded Valerie according to him. The insulting part of their relationship seemed as something that was natural for John and a normal trait that perhaps every relationship should have in order for men to take over the women by actually abusing them or orally humiliating them. The relationship was not seeming as communal in most everyday matters other than Valerie's requirements and wants which were somehow recognized according to a few conversations recorded in connecting the couple or maybe it was because they wanted to represent that they share a reasonable and healthy or stable relationship. Rational Result: The most obvious dynamics of this connection are supremacy, infringement, physical harm, aggravation, insecurities, disregard of women and many other detailed dynamics which come within all these obvious traits of this affiliation. One can without difficulty bring to a close that John is in some ways frightened by Valerie and most likely that is why these frustrations come out inside of him which of course is uttered through means physical and vocal abuse. It could also be conceivably because John wants to represent himself as dominant that according to him can only be done during hitting, punching and kicking Valerie. Concerning his condition of mind any one can immediately wrap up that John is extremely insecure and frustrated which is profound rooted in his actions and his connection agenda involves more of how to win the competition rather than stabilizing the affiliation with equal amount of love and admiration. Valerie's state of mind portrays that she is a conventional woman who considers a man to have the higher hand which can contain raising a hand on her and this is why she is putting up with it or conceivably if they have any kids that might be the only reason for the nourishment of this relationship. Feasible interpretations: The mainly feasible approaches towards a comprehensible accepting could be that John himself considers this type of actions as something very common and normal part of a connection perhaps for the reason that he saw his own father whipping his mother and since then his observation towards women is rather low-grade. His private improvement depends upon how he feels when he beats Valerie if he feels accountable and on mistake then there is a capacity of inventiveness in his character by making him comprehend that what he does is something very disgraceful but if he feels overriding and proud over the truth that he beats down Valerie then there are chances that his acts of bodily abuse will enlarge with time. The olden times of this couple can be predicted as to some extent the same or maybe deep-rooted in how they together couldn't equilibrium their emotional needs by giving each other the required time and space which gives nativity to a lot of relationship difficulties and in this case perhaps John feels unconfident in some ways which results in frustrations inside of him that are uttered through these acts of corporeal abuse. The only cause this relationship is still nourishing has to be Valerie and her love for John and her children if she has any which is still observance her by his side and that could be the basis why Valerie never retaliates as a rejoinder to the abusive acts or perhaps for the reason that she comes from a conditions where beating women is considered ordinary. Case 3: Adrian and the sexual assault Case explanation: The case revolves in relation to Adrian who had plans with two of his male friends after that in the sunset and so he went to the appointment location to meet his friends from there they all went to three dissimilar bars. Adrian thoroughly recalls that he took about six pints of Guinness and two whole shots of vodka with red bull all the way through the whole evening till he was there at the pubs. He remembers only him being a bit tipsy and not essentially very drunk and he recalls not even taking any road drugs. He could scarcely recall the last pub he left but all he remembers from that twilight is three semi-dressed men who Adrian recalls as somewhat foreign when it comes to their look and everywhere in their late twenties or mid thirties. He described one of them saying to him that he hoped he had a good night because he was sure they had and Adrian took this as obvious evidence which indicates towards him being sexually battered. Over his arrival he went directly to bed and woke up about eight hours later feeling angry and violent towards those men and the same day he went out with the same friends but did not disclose to them about what he think had happened that night-time. A few days afterwards Adrian practised strange sensations in his genital area and anus that made him confident regarding what happened was absolutely sexual attack and it was against his will. He said that maybe his drinks were intentionally spiked which is why the anonymous men took advantage of him. Nevertheless, he spoke to his administrator at work and told him about each and the whole lot giving him reasons why he did not report his complaint and when those male friends were investigated regarding the whole scenario they simply denied by saying that Adrian went missing later that evening and that they had no idea where he went which speaks quite obviously for the crime they had possibly committed or at least were a part of it. Logical results and analytical techniques: The entire situation depicts that those two friends who went for drinks with Adrian had probably conspired all of this and as an obvious conclusion Adrian was sexually assaulted by three anonymous men and if it is medically doubted Adrian should provide the investigators with medical tests which prove the sexual attack. As an important part of the examination the two male friends should be lengthily interrogated with questions such as the names of the three pubs and what they had seen by the help of lie detectors. Analysis: The only crime it can be recognized as other than sexual attack and rape is perhaps male prostitution which can be recognized through an wide examination of the two friends who went with Adrian to the pubs and if they one way or another intentionally spiked the drinks that Adrian had and possibly sold him to three anonymous people who were perhaps looking for a male prostitute or perhaps someone who was too drunk which according to Adrian he was not but then the spiked drinks would have done the trick. On the other hand, to obviously present this case the examination team should cross-examine the two friends by asking them every sole detail possible because they were the people Adrian was with for half the twilight. The examination team should focus on each little detail because maybe Adrian himself was so drunk that he forgot what happened and he in all probability did all of that in a cognisant but too drunk state of mind and body. Case 3: Mary and her extremist behaviour Case explanation: This case introduces Mary, a twenty-seven-year-old girl who participates at the animal rights exhibition that took place at a Pharmaceutical explore Centre. Mary contributes in the expression vigorously through out the three days that it took place where she spoke in the most destructive and loud method as compared to the other activists with an integration of offensive words in her speech whereas, her body language was totally different from her vocal state. She was under arrest by the Police on using such abusive words directing towards people whom she referred to as animal killers. She was very suspended when the Police interrogated her and during which she also said that she just wanted the workforce working in such companies to enquiry the ethics of their manager's result in a rational way and wants that the Centre should stop overwhelming animals for their researches and experiments. She also said that she was wrongly supposed when people thought of her as an important person who wanted the Centre to close down totally and that she did not belong to any campaigner groups but she discovered the dates of this protest at the centre through an internet website. Mary towards the end of the discussion claims that she just wanted people to be aware and recognize the rights of animals rather than putting the message through by destructive means. Logical Result: A very straightforward way to finish this whole situation is to look into the psychological aspect of Mary and how she wanted to put her message through which can be apparent as somewhat revolutionary but for the most part she was falsely apparent because she also claimed that she just wanted people to be aware and recognize how animal killing is an act which is entirely immoral and it should be acknowledged as unethical internationally. Her purpose behind the entire act was probably the significance of the message for herself and how bad she wanted the world to recognize it as something wholly immoral. Mary considered the stage of the pharmaceutical centre as the most suitable one for dispersal the word out with deepest of her intentions. The inspiration that imitative her to do something like this in front of so many people was the cause itself and not the radicalism part which was decorated so much but just how much she wanted the pharmaceutical centre to stop by means of animals for carrying out their investigate and experiments since the matter was very close to her heart and it extremely shattered her from the inside when these animals were killed and conceivably that drive within of her bound her to speak so uncompromisingly and loudly at the centre. She still said that she did not be in the right place to any campaigner group which portrays her person strength and how much the cause affected her that was to a very small degree an extremist deed which was obvious almost certainly just in the words she used and the quality of her voice. Bibliography: Schlesinger.L, 2000, Serial offenders: current thought, recent findings, CRC press Gardner.R, 2004, Practical crime scene processing and investigation, CRC press Holmes.S, 2002, Profiling violent crimes: an investigative tool, sage Turvey.B, 2008, Criminal profiling: an introduction to behavioural evidence analysis, academic press Howit.D, 2006, Introduction to forensic psychology, Prentice hall Goldstein.A, 2006, Forensic psychology: emerging topics and expanding roles, John Wiley and sons Pakes.F, Winstone.J, 2007, psychology and crime; understanding and tackling criminal behaviour, Willan publishing Putwain.D, Sammons.A, 2002, Psychology and crime, Routledge Read More