Nobody downloaded yet

See Assignment Criteria - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
(1) Sharon is criminally liable for homicide for the Danni's death. Homicide is the general term given to the unlawful killing of a person which usually takes the form of either murder or manslaughter. To be convicted of either murder or manslaughter, the following common elements1 must be present: 1…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92% of users find it useful
See Assignment Criteria
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"See Assignment Criteria"

Download file to see previous pages The three elements are present in the given problem. First, the killing of Danni was unlawful. Based on the facts presented in the given problem, Sharon does not have any lawful reason to kill Danni. Second, Danni who is the victim in the given problem is a life in being. Finally, Danni could be liable for murder or manslaughter because her act of sending a mail bomb (though merely intended to frighten Gordon) actually caused or brought about the instant death of the victim Sharon. Thus, in R. v Smith (1959)2, where the victim was stabbed and died shortly afterwards, the fact that adequate medical care was not available could not be relied upon by the defendant, even though such care, if available, would probably have saved the victim's life. As long as the stab wound remained an operative cause of death, the defendant was guilty of murder. In the given problem, the mail bomb sent by Sharon was the operative cause of Danni's death. Hence, Sharon is criminally liable for Danni's death.
In the case of R. v McFeely [1977] N.I. 149, the accused waited in a car while two men planted a bomb at an inn and carried out a robbery. After the two men warned the occupants that a bomb had been planted, the accused drove the two men away. As a result of the explosion, a police constable was killed. The accused was charged with murder and robbery. In its decision, the court held that the accused was not guilty of murder as although he knew the bomb was to be planted he also knew that a warning was to be given and that he didn't knew that it was probable that serious personal injury would result. Since the unlawful acts of the two men involved a risk of injury and as death had resulted, the accused was held guilty of manslaughter only. Applying McFeely, Sharon cannot be guilty of murder but for manslaughter only because even if Sharon knew the mail bomb was to be delivered to Gordon, death could not probably be the result as Sharon only intends to frighten Gordon.
In R. v Loudon3, the accused drove a van containing a bomb into the premises of newspaper establishment. He shouted a warning before running off. When the bomb exploded, one was killed. The accused was charged with murder. He contended that there was no evidence that he intended to kill or cause serious injury to anyone and that no necessary mental element was present. The trial judge convicted the accused, holding that the accused knew that there would ensue from his actions a serious risk of death or grievous bodily harm to someone and with that knowledge deliberately drove the van into the loading bay with the intention of exposing someone to that risk. On appeal, it was held that when the accused drove the van into the loading bay and left it there, he knew it was probable that someone would be seriously injured or killed. In the given problem, Sharon could argue that she only intended to frighten Gordon and had no intention of inflicting any bodily harm or death. Thus, she could only be held guilty of manslaughter and not murder. In R. v Bateson4, the accused was only convicted of manslaughter and not murder because according to the court, to be guilty of murder a person must know that it is probable that as a result of his or her actions someone will suffer death or serious personal injury. In Bateson, the trial judge convicted the accused of murder holding that she knew that there w ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“See Assignment Criteria Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1507197-see-assignment-criteria
(See Assignment Criteria Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1507197-see-assignment-criteria.
“See Assignment Criteria Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1507197-see-assignment-criteria.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Performance Evaluation
Secondly, the engineer’s qualifications exceed those of his evaluators so there is nobody rating the engineer who has the level of exposure similar to his own, thereby causing problems and leading them to focus on the relationship side of things when evaluating him.
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study
Assignment 4
Manufacturing procedures are not well laid out in the organization leading to repetitive conflicts with regard to who is responsible for what task. On the other hand, cooperation in the organization is wanting. Lack of cooperation resulted in poor production in the major departments that include manufacturing and engineering.
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
See 'Assignment Criteria' below
Mandy's union representative advised her that she could rely upon the Health and Safety in Offices Directive, which covered injuries sustained in that kind of working environment. This Directive was passed in October 2002, requiring member states to implement it by December 2003 at the latest.
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study
Refer to assignment criteria
Yet increasingly this distinction is blurred with compensation orders and other reparative ideas insinuating themselves as a regular adjunct of sentencing options. A second misconception concerns with the purpose of the criminal law. However, corporate risk-taking has disparate these two conceptions by rising issues against criminal law along with the law of corporations.
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study
''See Assignment Criteria''
James W Owens is the CEO and the chairman of Caterpillar. Apart from manufacturing, Caterpillar also designs, markets and sells the instruments and the engines. In addition, it also arranges for financing, training, and
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Motivation Assignment
If employee expects productive and desirable result, they will habitually perform hard according to the expectation of organization. Motivation of
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study
Case Assignment
Violent behavior by the worker may occur without notice increasing the number of people affected. The reason behind workplace violence differs across the different occupations available. In
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study
Foreign Assignment
to be adhered to in all the branches of the company so as to ensure that every employee is comfortable at the workplace regardless of the placement (Scevola, 2009). In terms of advancement, the code of conduct will act as a guide to evaluate the employee on whether they should
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
HYUNDAI. Identify the top companies in the industry ( automobile ) using your own selection of criteria (market capitalization, ROE, or any other criteria you wish to develop.) Your decisions on which set of criteria to use, are to be considered part of t
Market capitalization of the company determines the value of equity that the company has acquired in the industry. The industry is expanding and there are number of companies operating in this industry which are
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
Assignment
In addition following no barriers of entry there is high product substitution and economies of scale (Steel Industry Profile, 2013). The second force is raising rivalry in the established firms. Rivalry amongst the firms that are
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Case Study on topic See Assignment Criteria for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us