Ethics and Legal Professionals - Research Paper Example

The second scenario is the fact that the prosecutor could be giving the jury misleading information so that the jury becomes convinced that the suspect is actually liable for the crimes that he is accused of having committed, and thus influence the jury to believe in the guilt of the suspect, which will in turn favor the prosecutor by enabling the jury to favor the conviction and charging of the suspect as guilty. Therefore, the jury is faced with the dilemma of choosing who to believe between the prosecutor and the judge and thus is torn between following the judge’s direction and following the information given by the prosecutor.

The choice of whether to believe the prosecutor or to stick to the judge’s direction forms the ethical dilemma. The resolution of this ethical dilemma is complex since it entails the application of the relevant laws, which guide the conduct of professionals in the judicial system (Pollock, 2012). Legal professionals are required by the laws to conduct their activities regarding the cases before a court of law in accordance with the guidance of the code of conduct of the legal professionals.

According to the provisions of the code of conduct for legal professional, any legal professional handling a case before a court of law is prohibited from engaging in any form of discussion regarding the case with any side of the case, outside the courtroom (Beauchamp, Arnold & Bowie, 2009). Therefore, any discussion undertaken outside the courtroom with either the prosecution or the defense side is against the conduct of the legal professionals. Therefore, while the information provided by the prosecutor to the jury could be true and thus helpful to the determination of the case at hand, the manner in which it is obtained is against the provisions of the code of conduct of the professionals (Siegel & Worrall, 2013).

Therefore, resolving this ethical dilemma requires the jury to adhere to the necessary code of conduct and ignore all the information that is obtained from one-sided party to the case outside the courtroom since the individual may be interested in misleading the jury and thus have his stance favored. Therefore, the ethical dilemma can be resolved through adhering to the guidelines offered by the judge and ignoring all the information obtained outside the courtroom. The system of ethics that I would most likely employ is the law enforcement code of ethics.

This system of ethics provides that the fundamental function of a law enforcement officer, including the police, the prosecutor, the judge and the jury, is to serve mankind while at the same time protecting the innocent against deception and the weak against oppression (Siegel, 2010). This system of ethics requires the legal professionals to conduct themselves in a manner that respects the constitutional rights of all individuals to liberty and justice. The legal professionals are also required to observe honesty and be mindful of the welfare of the others, including that of the suspects, under the law enforcement code of ethics (Pollock, 2012).

The legal professionals are also required to obey the laws of the land and ensure that they adhere to