StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Miranda v. Arizona In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested and charged with rape, kidnapping and robbery. He confessed to all the crimes he was accused of within a grueling 2 hour interrogation process that was undertaken without any counsel present to advise Miranda of his rights…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.1% of users find it useful
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966)"

Download file to see previous pages His counsel appealed the case with the Arizona Supreme Court who agreed with a vote of 5-4 that the statements the police acquired from Miranda were not admissible in court because they failed to advise him of his rights as a police detainee (“Miranda V. Arizona (1966)”, n.d.). This decision became the precedent case for Westover v. United States, Vignera v. New York, and California v. Stewart which were all cases that were all decided on the basis of what became known as the Miranda Rights. So named after Ernesto Miranda, whose case became the landmark case that brought the rights of a police detainee to light. Miranda Rights have become part and parcel of proper police arrest procedure ever since the courts sided with Ernesto Miranda on his case. The Miranda Rights are the only set of laws that stand between a forced confession during interrogation (such as the case with Ernesto Miranda) and a properly accessed confession or information from the accused based on proper police procedure (due to the presence of legal counsel who advises the accused of his rights during questioning). There seems to be some confusion among the public pertaining to the circumstances and situations when a person must be read his Miranda Rights. Simply put, Miranda rights only come into play when police begin to question a suspect in a formal interrogation setting since he is being formally accused of a crime. It does not apply to traffic violations, DUI arrests, and other simple police situations. The Miranda is triggered when you are arrested and asked questions by the police. The police must, by law, inform you of your right to self incrimination and to free legal counsel prior to asking you any questions. The accused is normally informed of his Miranda Rights as part of this arrest procedure. Before the cuffs go on, the Miranda must be read. Otherwise, anything the accused says under interrogation will be deemed inadmissible in court (“Miranda”, n.d.). The rights of the accused to the protection of the Miranda Rights and the legal counsel afforded them under the Sixth Amendment can be formally waived by the accused once he formally refuses the protection of the law. Although it is not common for the accused to refuse his Miranda Rights, there have been certain instances in arrest / interrogation situations when the accused does exactly that. However, Miranda Rights are not easily waived. There are actually certain procedures that the accused has to pass through in order to waive these rights. His right to access his Miranda Rights cannot simply be implied by the accused. He must formally invoke his right to counsel and the right to self incrimination in order to be covered by the law. The accused may, at any given time after he is advised of his Miranda Rights, refuse to be covered by the law provided he signs a legal document waiving his right to remain silent, or the right to have legal representation present at his questioning. This is what is known as an Expressly Waiving Miranda Rights. On the other hand, an Implied Waiver of Miranda Rights may also be undertaken by the accused simply by behaving in such a way that indicates that he has full knowledge of his Miranda Rights and he has chosen to waive them (“Waiving Miranda Rights”, n.d.). The Miranda Law was created by a court of law based upon the United States Constitution and therefore cannot ...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Case Study”, n.d.)
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Case Study. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1468855-miranda-v-arizona
(Miranda V. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Case Study)
Miranda V. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Case Study. https://studentshare.org/law/1468855-miranda-v-arizona.
“Miranda V. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Case Study”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1468855-miranda-v-arizona.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966)

FP Iran V. Secretary of State for the Home Department

...Running Head: FP (IRAN) V. SECRETARY OF FOR THE HOME FP (Iran) V. Secretary of for the Home Department of Institution) Critical Assessment of significance of the case of “FP (Iran) V. Secretary of State for the Home Department” in the development of Administrative Law Introduction With the advent of civilisation and the law making process, it has been the endeavour of man to ensure that Rule of Law prevails in all decisions made in disputes. Judges have accepted time and again that just as everybody has certain rights that are subject to prevailing laws, so also all officials upholding the law have a responsibility to ensure that they shall not commit any act without proper justification. Administrative Law is a set of governing principles...
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Informal v. Formal Remittances

In this case, the transfer of money across the borders becomes an issue of primary importance for many families internationally (especially when these families are located in developing countries). In practice, it has been found that the transfer of money internationally can present significant failures especially when the firms involved do not take the appropriate measures for the protection of the consumer. However, in the case of workers, such an outcome can lead to severe consequences (the financial support of the family faces a delay within unknown outcomes). In the literature, the transfer of money across the world has been an issue extensively analyzed. Most of the relevant studies prove that the lack of appropriate technol...
37 Pages (9250 words) Assignment

Analysis of Lemuel Shaw 1830 Roberts v. The City of Boston Case

In 1801, Lemuel Shaw started studying law and was admitted to the bar in September 1804; after which he started practicing in Boston. Slowly his practice became large, however, he also served as the adviser of several commercial enterprises. Not only that, he held many public positions, from 1811 – 1814, as well as in 1820 and 1829, he was a member of the Massachusetts House of Representatives, during 1820 he also was a member of the constitutional convention, while in 1821 –1822, he served as a state senator. He was offered the position of Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court; after being so appointed in 1830, he served there for 30 years, till August 21, 1860, when he resigned. He had four children from t...
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Analysis of the Case of Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheepbreeders Association Ltd

There were several basic legal provisions that gave direction to the formation of a company in the United Kingdom. It has its original foundation in 1844 when the Joint Stock Companies Act1 1844 was formulated. It has given regulations for facilitating the formation of companies by "deed of settlement". Gradually, the shareholder concept was initiated in 1855 by the general incorporation procedure in the name of Limited Liability Act2 1855. This has offered limited liability to shareholders and provided identification to the company as a separate legal persona. The doctrine of limited liability postulates that a company shall be liable for the debts that it incurs, and even if it undergoes closure for any grounds, creditors cannot...
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

John Lockes View of Ownership in Context with the Mabo v Queensland

According to Ian Harris, Locke’s idea of justice simply suggests that the conformity between action & the rule of propriety should be understood in the sense of ‘a right to anything’ (Harris, 2000, p. 49). That means human rights must be restored in society, and when it comes to property, it can be examined in context with ‘abundance’. The more abundant is the property, the more usage of it can be met. However, the ‘abundance’ factor cannot be fulfilled in today’s economic conditions. Chapter V of the Second Treatise defines ‘property’ as land according to Locke and can be examined in two different ways. First, that land, property or external objects that are owned by...
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

S&T Debt Factors

The agreement contains a credit default contracts that include credit default swaps, default index contracts, credit default options, and credit default basket options. One can use these as part of the mechanism that is collateralized by debt obligations. The goal should be to establish a price for a given risk and controlling credit based on risk. The credit can be allowed by minimization of risk. Credit controllers should develop versatile tools that transfer risk away from a lender’s balance sheet.
d) With reference to the proposed debt counseling business, illustrate and explain exactly how you would organize the debt counseling operation, taking particular care to explain how and when you would receive payment for...
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Henry V by Shakespeare and the Rover by Aphra Behn

Henry V recognizes that his kingship is not a rule of lavishness but a rule of service. Summarising everything of what Henry is, Nym, a commoner, and thief, claimed: “The King is a good King…” (Shakespeare, Henry V)
Second, his glib of tongue he uses to empower his soldiers, to give life and courage to his downtrodden men. He does not use his eloquence to deceive nor to perpetuate lies. Rather, he uses his articulateness to restore the bravery of his soldiers, to supplicate God in his favor. All of which is a recognition that Henry V values more the camaraderie that he has with his soldiers above anything else. And this he succinctly shows even as a young King. He said to his men as they are about to fight...
7 Pages (1750 words) Book Report/Review

The Case of R v Turnbull

The defendants planned to rob a bank’s customer deposits in the bank’s safe by posting a notice diverting the dropbox to another location, which they planned to burgle. Several customers did, in fact, drop their wallets loaded with money into the dropbox, however, one customer was suspicious and alerted the police. The strength of the prosecution’s case rested on the visual recognition provided by a police constable who clearly saw one of the defendants removing a sign from the bank premises and recognized him. On this basis, the court of appeal concluded that the appeal of the defendants could not stand. It was held that if visual identification had been the only evidence, the outcome would not have been definit...
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

Analysis of OReilly v Mackman Case

Judicial review is a concept which is constitutionally undecided as it on one side, it shores up the rule of law, democracy, and pre-eminence of parliament by facilitating the courts to check the boundaries of government authority and on another side, the courts are open to the decision on the plants based on the fact of separation of authorities that are intimating with the verdicts of democratically elected institutions. Judicial review is not apprehended with the virtues of government assessment but deals with whether the deciding authority has remained within the legal boundaries and whether broad principles of rationality and fairness adhere. The constitutional basis of judicial review is debated as one view holds that it is...
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

International Affairs v. Liberalism

As a matter of fact, Hoffman’s statement that “international affairs is the nemesis of liberalism” has a grain of truth in it and this is especially so after the 9/11 incident.
There are two schools of thought or perspectives that are used to view international affairs: liberalism and realism. The study of these two perspectives is significant to the idea posed by Stanley Hoffman because they determine the reasons why international affairs, according to him, does not only see eye-to-eye with liberalism but seems to stand on the opposing side of it.
Liberalism can be defined as having four elements: citizens; the legislature; property rights, and; a market-driven economy (Dunne 186). Realism, on the othe...
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) for FREE!

Contact Us