We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

A landmark case: Miranda v. Arizona - Essay Example

Comments (0)
In the paper “A landmark case: Miranda v. Arizona” the author analyzes a landmark case, in the context of a suspected person’s rights during custodial interrogations by the police. The ruling in this case, generated considerable nationwide debate on this subject. …
Download full paper
A landmark case: Miranda v. Arizona
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
A landmark case: Miranda v. Arizona

Download file to see previous pages... The victim did not specifically identify Miranda as her molester. She merely stated that Miranda looked akin to the attacker and that his features seemed to be similar to those of her attacker. The police officer intentionally deceived Miranda and stated that the victim had identified him as her attacker. Subsequently, Miranda was arrested and two police officers took him to an interrogation room. In that place Miranda confessed to having molested the victim. During this entire process, Miranda was at no point of time informed that he had a right to abstain from incriminating himself. In addition, he was not advised to seek the assistance of an attorney although he had the right to do so (Miranda Rights - A view Across the Pond).
In order to justify their inequitable actions, the police stated that Miranda, as an ex-convict, was expected to be familiar with the process of interrogation. Moreover, the police submitted a written confession by Miranda; which had a disclaimer printed at the top that the suspect had been informed of his rights. The disclaimer also stated that the confession had been made voluntarily without any coercion. As such, the rights of the suspect were not printed on this paper (Miranda Rights - A view Across the Pond).
Subsequently, the case came up before the Supreme Court, where a 5:4 majority held that the police had to follow certain basic procedures, as specified in the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, in order to protect the rights of a suspect during custodial interrogations. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Criminal Justice the Case of Gideon Wainwright
Gideon had been arrested in 1961, but could not afford to pay for a lawyer. On his request to appoint an attorney, the judge told him that in Florida, attorneys were appointed only to indigent defendants whose cases could result in death penalty if found guilty.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Miranda v. Arizona
While at trial, his lawyer pointed out that Miranda had not been read his rights; therefore, the confession was not signed voluntarily and should not be used as evidence. The attorney’s objection was overruled and Miranda was imprisoned for his crimes. In 1966, Miranda appealed to the Supreme Court, who ruled in his favor, claiming that Miranda’s confession could not be used as the police had failed to inform Miranda of his right to an attorney.
2 Pages(500 words)Thesis
Miranda v. Arizona
constitutional law. Centered on the case was an indigent Mexican, Ernesto Miranda, who made and signed a written confession to crimes of kidnapping and rape in Arizona in 1963. During the custodial police interrogation, Miranda was not accorded his privilege of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the Constitution: the right against self-incrimination and the right to assistance of a legal counsel, respectively.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
During his arrest, the police neglected to inform him of his right to self incrimination as well as his Sixth Amendment right to have free counsel assigned to represent him during his questioning. Being of little education and with a history of mental instability, Miranda found himself declared by the court as guilty of the crimes he confessed to and facing a 20-39 year prison sentence.
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study
Miranda vs. Arizona
We know we have the right to remain silent and have a right to an attorney. Yet, the Miranda decision was far more reaching than the few principles that are read from a card. It reaches back into history to establish a precedent and presents ongoing dilemmas as it faces new challenges for the courts and law enforcement.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Roe v. Wade or Miranda v. Arizona
on, made without any assurance of protection or threats and “with complete familiarity of his legal privileges, including any declaration which he made might be employed against him. Later, Miranda’s admission was allowed into testimony at the trial, and he was sentenced
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Miranda v. Arizona
Subsequently, the prosecution presented this confession at trial. This was objected to by the defense, but the presiding judge admitted the confession as evidence (MIRANDA V. ARIZONA: AN OVERVIEW AND
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Fully describe the law established by the US Supreme Court concerning the effective assistance of counsel. In the response, fully explain the majority opinion & dissent of Strickland v Washington (1984) & the Court's later cases that interpret Strick
The law requires interrogating police officers to inform the defendant of his or her right to legal counsel throughout the investigation
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
CRJ 422 Week 3 discussions 1 and 2
According to this theory, exposing an individual to the right values, norms and beliefs is a significant step in ensuring that the individual shuns
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Landmark Decisions
As per the constitution of Federal Government, people belonging to different races do not have compartments in same rail cars. As per the constitution, Plessy had thus violated the rules. However, as per Plessy, the
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic A landmark case: Miranda v. Arizona for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us