Free

Brief The Of State V. Stark - Case Study Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Summary
The Case Study "Brief The Case Of State V. Stark" analyzes that during the period from June 30, 1988, to October 3, 1989, the Clallam Health Department’s staff met five times with the defendant, during which the defendant went through broad guidance about his infection. 
 …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.7% of users find it useful
Brief The Case Of State V. Stark
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Brief The Of State V. Stark"

Brief The Case Of State V. Stark
History
Calvin Stark was convicted within the Superior Court, Clallam County Washington, of two Counts of second-degree dishonor for intentionally disclosing his intimate partner to the HIV (Human Immunodeficiency virus), and he appealed. The Washington Court of Appeals asserted and remitted the case for commutation.
Facts
On March 25, 1988 Calvin Edward Stark hereafter “Defendant” was tested to be positive for HIV, which was substantiated by further testing initially on June 25 and then again on June 30, 1988. During the period from June 30, 1988 to October 3, 1989, the Clallam County Health Department’s staff met five times with the defendant, during which the defendant went through broad guidance about his infection. He was instructed regarding safe sex, the danger of dispersing the infection and the need of letting his partners know about his disease prior to engaging in sexual practice with them. The Clallam County Health Officer, Dr. Locke on October 3, 1989, after discovering that the defendant has neglected his advise and was engaging in unprotected sexual practice, issued a cease and desist order as approved by RCW 70.24.024(3)(b). But the defendant did not cease and desist and Dr. Locke on March 1, 1990, went to the prosecuting officer’s office aiming to look for the prosecutor’s assistance, consistent to RCW 70.24.034(1), in getting juridical enforcement of the “cease and desist order”. Stark was then charged by the State with three assault counts in the second degree under RCW 9A.36.021 (1) (e). RCW 9A.36.021 (1) (e).
At the panel trial, in count one, the victim attested to her sexual relationship with Stark and the panel received deposition testimony of Dr. Locke concerning the contacts of Health Departments with Stark. In the bench trial, Dr. Locke testified but it was not testified by Stark. In front of the bench trial, the State demonstrated testimony of one of neighborhood friends of Stark. She attested that Stark on one night, after drinking, visited her apartment and let her know about his state of being HIV positive. Upon asking about the need of protecting oneself, Stark denied the need and also asserted his desire of spreading the infection to others. The jury thus established Stark to be guilty on count one.
Stark was then found guilty of the second as well as third counts by second trial judge at a bench trial. Stark was rendered an extraordinary sentence of 120 months on count one, due to the being a danger towards the community in future. While the usual range for such offense was between 13 to 17 months. On the other hand, Stark, on counts two and three, was rendered the lower end of the usual range i.e., 43 months each, to be assisted at the same time but sequentially to count one (Samaha 10).
Part b
Stark attempted review of the Superior Court’s judgment for Washington’s Clallam County that made him a convict of three counts of second-degree assault and that, later in count one the judgment of guilty, enforced a sentence that surpassed the standard range.
Part c
Court’s Decision
The court asserted defendant's condemnations for three counts of second-degree assault, but remitted the case for commutation on count one.
Part d
Standard on which Case Relied
Stark elicits a number of matters in his pro se brief. Initially, he argues that the State had been unsuccessful to charge him properly [*438] with assault due to particular statutory prohibitions pre-empt universal ones. More particularly, he contests that RCW 70.24 displaced the more common provisions of RCW 9A.36.021 (1) (e).
Secondly, Stark contests that the court strayed in viewing evidence that came from rigid confidence since it was confined by the physician-patient privilege. Dr. Locke, as mentioned above, did not dishonor the privilege as [***24] he appropriately attempted the enforcement of the cease and desist order from the prosecuting officer. The psychologist-patient privilege is relevant "only 'so far as practicable' in criminal cases." State v. Mark, 23 Wn. App. 392, 396, 597 P.2d 406 (1979). It is statutory, legal, not of constitutional order of magnitude. State v. Boehme, 71 Wn.2d 621, 634, 430 P.2d 527 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1013 (1968); RCW 5.60.060(4). Practical application of the privilege necessitates a harmony of the gains of the privilege versus the public concern of full disclosure of the facts. Petersen v. State, 100 Wn.2d 421, 429, 671 P.2d 230 (1983) (Dickson 20).
Lastly, Stark contests that the State consecrated an ex post facto frailty by utilizing confidential information to accuse him with assault. Stark confesses that if the public prosecutor had suitably complied with the statutory guidelines then an ex post facto infirmity would not have been established. Moreover, he contends that the employment of confidential information by the prosecuting officer, in order to assure a conviction made such an infirmity. Stark seems to be contending that since the Legislature provided him an enthroned right in the privacy of his HIV status, [***25] the [*439] use of information by the prosecutor to accuse him criminally eliminated that right, thus creating [**118] an ex post facto loss. As mentioned above, the prosecutor officer did not surpass his authority in depending on Stark's or else confidential information concerning his HIV status.

Work Cited
Samaha, J. Criminal law. 9th. Belmont, Ca: Cengage Learning, Inc, 2008. Print.
Dickson, D. HIV, AIDS, and the law: legal issues for social work practice and policy. Hawthrone, New York: A division of Walter de Gruyter, Inc, 2001. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Brief The Case Of State V. Stark Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1466510-brief-the-case-of-state-v-stark
(Brief The Case Of State V. Stark Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1466510-brief-the-case-of-state-v-stark.
“Brief The Case Of State V. Stark Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1466510-brief-the-case-of-state-v-stark.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
st
strosinsophie added comment 7 months ago
Student rated this paper as
The topic of "Brief The Case Of State V. Stark" is quite often seen among the tasks in university. Still, this sample opens a brand new perspective of seeing the problem. I’ll use the manner for my own paper.
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Case Brief : Terry v. Ohio
...? Case Brief: Terry v. Ohio of the of the For many years now, Police in the United s have engaged in investigative practices which are commonly known as ‘Stop and Frisk’. This process normally involves the stopping of a person or vehicle with the purpose of interrogation or a brief investigation. This process is sometimes accompanied by a ‘pat down’ search of the outer clothing or apparel of the suspect, done with a view to ensure that the person is unarmed. While this mechanism is common place in today’s high risk world, its validity juxtaposed to the Fourth Amendment was examined by the Hon’ble United States Supreme Court in the case of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study
Case Brief: Wyeth v. Levine
...? Case Brief: Wyeth v. Levine Table of Contents I. Facts 3 II. Issue 4 III. Decision 4 IV. Reasons 5 References 8 I. Facts Wyeth markets the drug Phenergan, the generic name of which is promethazine hydrochloride, which is indicated for nausea, as an antihistamine medication. In its injectable form, it can be administered either as a drip, known as an IV-drip, or as a vein-injectable, in a procedure known as an IV-push. It is known that Phenergan can cause gangrene when it is able to get into the artery of a patient, because of its corrosive nature. Such is the case with the plaintiff Levine in this case, whose right hand and later the whole forearm was...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Terry v. Ohio Case Brief
...?Terry v. Ohio Case Brief The short of Terry v. Ohio can be explained as the U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the 4th amendment prohibition pertaining to unreasonable search and seizures. The decision of the court states that the 4th Amendment right is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect in the street and proceeds to frisk him even though there is no visible probably cause to arrest the person. Rather, the act of the police officer is done upon his or her suspicion that a crime may be undertaken because of a sense or reasonable belief that the person in question may be armed and presently dangerous. This was the decision that the...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
Complete case brief of Nix v. Williams
...Case brief of Nix v. Williams Facts The defendant, Mr. Williams was apprehended and his rights regarding the murder of the child were read to him – after giving information that led law enforcement personnel to the recovery of the body of the victim. The officer that collected the information from him had passed it to officials that had been continuing the search. The statements made by Williams were not admissible as evidence at the court during a trial, but the recovered body, the information from chemical and medical tests, and photographic information were admitted as evidence against him. During the trial of Williams, the court held that, even in the case that...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study
Case Brief - McGurn v Bell
...Case Brief RE: McGurn v. Bell Microproducts, Inc. Facts George McGurn met with the president of the Bell microproducts who gave the position of the company. At that meeting, gave a condition that for him to take the employment offer by Bell, he should be issued with a contract in the written form inclusive a termination clause specifying that in case his contract was terminated he will be given half his commissions plus six months’ salary. Following several discussions with an official from Bell, Bell issued him with a contract devoid of the termination clause which he rejected. During one of these discussions, McGurn said that a termination clause covering his initial...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Case Brief U.S v. Hinkley
... unstable person and his actions had been influenced by things, not relevant to the case. In such a situation, the decision of the District Court seems justified. Sources 1. Fuller, Vincent. J (1982), United States Vs John Hinckley Junior, retrieved on December 7, 2011 from http://llr.lls.edu/volumes/v33-issue2/fuller.pdf 2. United States v. Hinckley, a recent successful use of the insanity defense, retrieved on December 7, 2010 from http://www.law.cornell.edu/background/insane/hinckley.html... Case Brief U.S Vs Hinkley Facts On March 30, 1981, a man d John W. Hinckley Junior shot the then US President Ronald Reagan in an attempt to assassinate him. During the process, he hit and wounded four people who were...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Love Brief case state v stark
...Case brief: Stark v. Stark Facts: In the year 1988 it comes to Stark’s knowledge that he is HIV positive. After confirmation of the disease he receives proper counseling and training as far as safe sex and managing his HIV was concerned. Despite numerous warnings Stark disregards the doctor’s orders, which was when he is left with no choice but to implement a “cease and desist order” authorized by RCW 70.24.024(3)(b). Even then Stark’s failure to comply resulted in his doctor reporting his actions to the County prosecutor’s office where he was then charged with three accounts of assault in 2nd degree...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
Case Brief: J.D.B v. North Carolina
...Case Brief: J.D.B v. North Carolina Procedural History The case of J.D.B. v. North Carolina was decided by the Supreme Court of North Carolina. It was appealed up to the Supreme Court of North Carolina from the trial court to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, and finally to the State Supreme Court. Facts Relevant facts to the case having a bearing on the final verdict of the court included whether investigator, DiCostanzo’s taking J.D.B. to the conference room of the school for questioning constituted custodial arrangement of questioning, wherein the accused was not provided Miranda alerts, and that he was forced to...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
Brief of case U.S v. Kozeny
...United s v. Kozeny 582 F. Supp. 2d 535 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85443 (2008) Facts of the Case: SOCAR is the oil company of the Republic of Azerbaijan. During the middle of the 1990s, Azerbaijan started a privatization program, where President Heydar Ali-yev had the authority to decide if and when to privatize SOCAR. Bourke and others allegedly breached the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) by paying certain Azeri officials to persuade them to privatize SOCAR and to allow them to partake in its privatization. Bourke argued that these payments were legal under Azeri law and also under the FCPA because they were outcomes of extortion, and that by reporting the payments to the President, he should be absolved of...
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study
Seawest Services Association v Copenhaver Case Brief
...Seawest Services Association v Copenhaver Case BriefCase 11.2 Seawest Services Association v Copenhaver 166 Wash. App. 1006 (2012). Court of Appeal of Washington Issue Seawest Services Association have responsibility of supplying water in and out of a housing development. Residents inside the housing development received water services from Seawest at a fee. Residents outside the housing development that received the water services were also required to pay the supply and maintenance fee. The Copenhavers were limited members of the housing development, they purchased a house outside the housing development but received water services from Seawest...
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Brief The Case Of State V. Stark for FREE!
Contact Us