Court Report Criminal - Essay Example

Paul’s Cathedral. The Old Bailey street would be on your left if you walk from Waterloo after crossing the Waterloo Bridge, turn right and keep going. It has two public gallery networks. Daily lists are in the notice board on the outside wall. Security is very strict so read the warning I have set out below. In Old Bailey Court you can wander in and out of dozens of courtrooms and see the most important judges like the Lord Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls at work. Daily lists and lots of information are in the main hall (Anonymous, 2012).

My Visit to the Central Criminal Court (“Old Bailey”) I went to visit a murder case at the Old Bailey criminal court on 3rd, October 2012 and followed the case again on 10th, October 2012. I went to court number 14 and sat in the public gallery where I was allowed to take notes about this case. In my first visit to the court on 3rd of October 2012, there was the cross examination of the Manzar Juma who was charged with murder of Ruby Love. The prosecution was giving cell site evidence to the jury, and showing all the text messaging that was exchanged between Juma and deceased women Ruby Love.

Prosecution gave copies of all relevant material such as text messages, mobile coverage and addresses to the jury as well as to the QC and counsel of the Mr Juma, both the judge and Mr Juma see all the copies and read them out one by one. Cell site evidence contained all the information regarding where Mr Juma was a day before the death of Ruby and all the text messaging that came along with all recorded times and the time of their conversation. It was heard that there were changing of unpleasant words you could say, that they were having an argument as such (Kelly and Camber, 2011).

The judge seemed to have matters well under control in his courtroom and went on the legal proceeding moving forward expeditiously. The jury heard that on the day of Ruby’s death, where Juma was located and how he had two mobile phones that he communicated with Ruby and in one of the text messages he had arranged to pick her up (Darbyshire, 2011). On 29th of December 2011, police rang the phone number that they had found on the mobile of Ruby love and that number belonged to Mr Juma. Shortly after the cell site evidence the prosecution gave an indication and evidence of both Juma’s blood examination of any indication of drugs, and also Ruby’s blood evidence was read out (Hardiman, 2012).

The forensic toxicologists’ examination showed that the blood of Ruby Love had traces of Methadone, heroin, Cocaine, Ecstasy pills, cannabis and alcohol. The blood of Mr. Juma was also examined and tested for alcohol and drugs and indicated that he had traces of basic drugs such as cannabis and alcohol in his blood. In addition to this, experts also gave evidence of Ruby’s body fluid. As the prosecution was finished giving his evidence, the QC of Mr Juma called Mr Juma to the stand and he was asked many questions from his counsel (Kirk, 2012).

The prosecutor provided a big contrast to the defence attorney. Mr Juma said that he did not have a very good relationship with his father, and only saw him up until he was 15 years old. He denies murder. His QC asked him whether he had any trouble at school whilst growing up, and he replied, yes he did, from the moment he found out that his mother had tumour and he became very angry and upset, therefore he did not do very well at