Kip Kinkel: Criminal Theories - Research Paper Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Kipland Kinkel is a notorious killer who shot his parents and went on to kill two students and injure many others in the Thurston High School. A study of the events leading up to his crime gives us several insights to his personality. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.9% of users find it useful
Kip Kinkel: Criminal Theories
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Kip Kinkel: Criminal Theories"

Kip Kinkel: Criminal Theories. Kipland Kinkel is a notorious killer who shot his parents and went on to kill twostudents and injure many others in the Thurston High School. A study of the events leading up to his crime gives us several insights to his personality. It is seen that his criminal behavior particularly lends itself to explanation through the application of the Psychological Theory and the Sociological Theory of criminal behavior. Kip Kinkel: Criminal Theories. The case of Kip Kinkel remains one to the most notorious instances of a school shooting in the USA. On 20 May, 1998, Kip Kinkel shot dead his parents at their home in Springfield, Oregon. He went on to Thurston High School, where he indulged in a killing spree, “methodically emptying 51 rounds from a semiautomatic rifle and a handgun” (Savage, 1998) on the students in the cafeteria. He killed two students and injured about 22 others, before he was overcome by other students and disarmed. Explosives and partially assembles bombs were found in the house. A brief account of Kinkel’s life before this fateful day gives us insights into his personality, and helps to explain his criminal behavior in the context of theories of crime.   Kipland Kinkel was born to Bill Kinkel and Faith Zuranski on 30 August, 1982. He is held back in the first grade because he “lacked maturity and had slow emotional and physical development” (Frontline, Chronology, 2000). He has problems with the written language, demonstrating “an abnormally high” (Frontline, Chronology, 2000) level of frustration and anxiety. He qualifies for special education services, and is diagnosed with learning disabilities, although he shows exceptional ability in Mathematics and Science. From the seventh grade, Kip and his friends indulge in dubious activities: ordering bomb-building manuals, shop-lifting, and throwing rocks at cars from a highway overpass. Kip secretly buys an old shotgun from a friend in 1996. In January 1997, Kip begins counseling sessions with psychologist Dr. Jeffrey Hicks, who diagnoses him with “difficulty with learning in school, had difficulty managing anger, some angry acting out and depression” (qtd. in Frontline, Chronology, 2000). The Department of Youth Services gives Kip a clean chit. Kip persists in his interest in explosives and guns. Hicks recommends a course of Prozac for Kip’s depression. Kip appears to improve and the counseling is stopped. In July 1997, Bill buys his son a 9mm Glock. Kip goes on to secretly purchase a .22 pistol from a friend. In September, Bill buys Kip a .22 semiautomatic rifle. On 20 May 1998, Kip buys a stolen semiautomatic gun from a friend in school. He is arrested and released home. Kip shoots his parents. On the following morning, he executes the school killings. When we consider Kipland Kinkel’s actions in the light of the theories of criminal behavior, it is seen that Psychological theories, and Sociological theories in particular, are relevant in this case. Psychological Theories attempt to identify the risk factors and causes associated with the crime. The mental disorders exhibited by criminals are psychosis and neurosis. In this context, Kip Kinkel is diagnosed as psychotic by the psychologists who testified for the defense in his trial. Kip’s learning disorder, depression, sense of alienation and injustice, low self-esteem, paranoia, and his perception of adults as “unfair, arbitrary and untrustworthy” are cited as signs of psychosis. (Frontline, The Sentencing, 2000). In accordance with the fact that Psychological theories include delusions and hallucinations as definite symptoms of psychosis (Meithe, 9), it is significant that Kip refers to “these voices inside by head” (qtd. in LeFevre, 2000) as the reason for his crime. Kip asserts that it was the voices which ordered him to kill: “The voices said, ‘Shoot him.’ --- ‘Go to school and kill everybody.’” (qtd. in Fontline. The Sentencing, 2000). Further evidence of Kip’s psychotic tendencies is seen from his journal entries, which reveal a sense of isolation and suppressed rage: “I am always alone --- I am so full of rage” (qtd. in Frontline, The Sentencing, 2000). Kip Kinkel’s criminal behavior can be attributed to psychological degeneracy. Social Process theories are particularly relevant in the case of Kip Kinkel. These theories focus on the interaction between the individual and the environment. According to Sutherland’s Theory of Differential Association, the individual’s primary context for learning criminal behavior is with “significant others” in intimate personal groups. (Meithe, 25). In this context, it is relevant that Kip’s antisocial behavior in shop-lifting, rock-throwing, and secret buying of firearms, is within the circle of his friends. It can be argued that his Kip learned some of the aspects of criminal behavior from his close friends. Another Sociological Theory which is especially relevant in Kip’s criminal behavior is Sykes and Matza’s Techniques of Neutralization, according to which the denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of victim, condemnation of the condemners, and appeal to a higher loyalty, are used to neutralize criminal inhibitions. (Meithe, 27). Kip abdicates responsibility for his crime by saying, “I had no other choice” (LeFevre, 2000), and blames the voices in his head. Likewise, Kip denies his parents as victims by claiming that he “killed his parent to spare them the shame” (LeFevre, 2000). Gotffredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime is another sociological theory which is applicable to Kip Kinkel. External social controls, such as attachment to parents, and involvement in school, affect the internal self-control which blocks criminal behavior. (Meithe, 29). In Kip’s case, this socialization process fails, as he has a strained relationship with his father, and indulges in aggressive behavior in school. Kip has low self-control, and succumbs to his criminal tendencies. It can also be mentioned here that, as per the Labeling Theory (Meithe, 29), it is possible that Kip’s arrest by the police in the rock throwing incident may have contributed to his development of a deviant self-concept. Kip declares, “I am a horrible son --- I am nothing” (qtd. in Frontline, The Sentencing, 2000). Kip Kinkel’s criminal behavior can be largely explained along the lines of the Social Process theories. In combination with the Psychological theories that point to Kip’s psychosis, these theories go a large way towards explaining his behavior. However, it remains difficult to rationalize the rage exhibited by Kipland Kinkel, and his heinous crime. References. LeFevre, Greg. 14 March, 2000. Tapes Show Kinkel’s Return to Scene of Oregon School Shooting. CNN U.S. Retrieved on 4 May, 2012 from Savage, Martin. May 22, 1998. Accused Oregon School Shooter Shows no Emotion in Court. CNN U.S. Retrieved on 4 May, 2012 from Frontline. January, 2000. The Killer at Thurston High. web site. 2012. Retrieved on 4 May, 2012 from Meithe, Terance, D. (Year of Publication). Criminology Lecture Series, 3rd Edition. Place of Publication. Name of Publisher. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Kip Kinkel: Criminal Theories Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Kip Kinkel: Criminal Theories Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Kip Kinkel: Criminal Theories Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
reeseschuppe added comment 1 year ago
Student rated this paper as
I never thought 750 words essay could be written in such a free manner. I loved the content of this essay. Will definitely use it for my own work!

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Kip Kinkel: Criminal Theories

The Sociological Theories in Criminal Justice

...?The Sociological Theories in Criminal Justice The Sociological Theories in Criminal Justice submission) The Sociological Theories in Criminal Justice Abstract Criminal act had been a menace in the society and in the criminal justice system with its disturbing if not devastating effects. Although, criminal justice is vigilant in their duty to prosecute offenders, it seems that the number of crimes committed in an everyday basis remain to be the same. As part of the campaign to eventually find some solution with the problem, the criminal justice is looking into...
7 Pages(1750 words)Assignment

Criminal Justice Theories

...? Criminal Justice Theories Lecturer Criminologists have, for a long time, put their emphasis strictly on the roles of the criminal. However, researchers have, over some years, discovered that the role played by the victim is actually very vital just as the role of the criminal. This is because the role of the victim can shape, influence fate and motivate a criminal. A number of theories today explain the causes of victimization and victimization itself. This paper seeks to explain three of those theories: Victim Precipitation Theory, Differential Association Theory and Labeling...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Theories of the Criminal Mind

...? Theories of Criminal Mind Comparison The three theories of criminal behavior selected for thisassignment includes: Hirschi’s self control theory, Strain Theory as well as Social Learning Theory. Hirschi’s self control theory states that there are two kinds of people. First are those who have high self control and the second are those who have low self control. Hirschi states that self control develops at a very young age of around seven or eight and the level of control that an individual has over himself, continues to be of same level at later stages in life (Andrews, 2010, p.109). Hirschi states that people who have lower self control over themselves have law control over their desires and wants and they want to achieve aims... to this...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Criminal Theories of Crime

...Running Head: Criminal Theories of Crime Criminal Theories of Crime s Criminal Theories of Crime PART ONE: Each theory has a particular understanding of what produces crime in society. Discuss what those causes are for Anomie, Control, conflict, and Differential Association theories. What are the similarities and differences between them? Which of the approaches do you find most appealing? What is it about that approach that strikes you as useful in explaining crime or delinquency? Crime is increasing in our society. We often ask ourselves "why?". There are many reasons. Firstly the law isnt strict...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Criminal Behavior - A discussion of theories

...of as a contributing factor to his killing spree. Fourteen years after his conviction, John Wayne Gacy was put to death by lethal injection and died at the hands of the state of Illinois. Now that we have complete a thorough overview of the mass murderer John Wayne Gacy and the antecedents to one of the most prominent serial killing sprees in modern American history, how would criminological theorists have viewed the causes and crimes of Mr. Gacy? From a criminal theory perspective, Robert Merton was an early proponent of social strain theory, an important theoretical paradigm for the analysis of criminal behavior. This theory argues that our...
10 Pages(2500 words)Term Paper

Criminal justice theories - power control theory

...that, difference in mothers’ control within patriarchal households influences the support the son’s obtain in terms of conservative opinions, especially, in gender-related activities and their insight about impunity. This difference also influences their son’s connection to criminal activities. In addition, the findings indicate the presence of mothers in less patriarchal family structures is unacceptable as a source of reduced criminal behavior among the sons (McCarthy, Hagan & Woodward, 1999). The article supports that power control theory determines the delinquency in different family structures. However, most authors refute with the assumption of this theory that...
3 Pages(750 words)Book Report/Review

White-collar crime and criminal theories

... White Collar Crime and Criminal Theories One of the notable theories that remarkably explain white collar crime is the rational choice theory. The purpose of this theory in the explanation of white collar crime entails the explanation of the circumstances under which offenders choose to engage in crime. According to the rational choice theories, there tends to be situational factors that can be regarded as the main causes of white-collar crime. The theory stipulates that certain factors within the institution can be used as the basis upon which white-collar crime can be explained. There is a connection between white-collar crime and rational choice. Based on the rational choice theory, individuals engage in crime deliberately... , and they...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Domestic violence and criminal theories

...Psychological Theory Explanation to Domestic Violence Conventional approaches to domestic violence can be categorized in psychoanalytic theories; family and systems theories; social theories; feminist theories; and, cognitive behavioral theories. The paper employs attachment theory to investigate domestic violence and seeks to elaborate on why abusive relationships persist. Psychological theories to domestic violence have highlighted diverse psychopathologies within the perpetrator, inclusive of elements such as self-esteem, antisocial tendencies, the lack of impulse control, and the impacts of...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Theories of criminal behaviour

...a situation in which the focus of the approach is so narrow that other approaches would be better in addressing the problem at hand. This is very much the case with regards to labeling theory; as it ignores many of the most rational explanations of differentials; while at the same time putting forward an approach that is riddled with logical inconsistencies. What are the main assumptions in a Marxist view of crime and the criminal law? As the name implies, a Marxist interpretation of crime and/or criminal law is predicated upon the understanding that crime is the result of inequalities of an economic realm. Furthermore, criminal law, within the Marxist interpretation,...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Criminal Justice - Chap 8 Critical Theories - Chap 9 Conclusion: Integrated Theories, Developmental Theories and Beyond

...Critical Theories CRIMINAL THEORIES Conflict criminology theory looks at the society as having a conflict of interest between twoparties, dominant group, and subordinate group (Bohm, 2010). The conflicting groups usual differ due to unequal distribution of resources and power. One group dominates the other group. In conflict criminology, conflict is a characteristic in the society as a result of uneven distribution of labour and wealth (Dekeseredy, 2013). Dominant groups in the society are believed to use crime and criminal law to control the inferior group. The dominant group, goes ahead to create a public impression, which stipulates that, their...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Kip Kinkel: Criminal Theories for FREE!

Contact Us