Nobody downloaded yet

Jurisprudence: Positivism and the Tradition of Austin - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Introduction Professor HLA Hart upended the legal world with his treatise about the nature of law. In doing so, he critiqued the legal philosophies of Bentham and Austin, stating that they were naive, especially Austin, in stating that laws are based upon coercion and just the fact that these laws are in existence, without taking into account the standards by which these laws should be based…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.6% of users find it useful
Jurisprudence: Positivism and the Tradition of Austin
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Jurisprudence: Positivism and the Tradition of Austin"

Download file to see previous pages Positivism and the Tradition of Austin In H.L.A. Hart’s critique of the legal philosophies of Bentham and Austin, Hart explains that these two men saw that laws as they are should be distinguished from laws as they should be. In other words, there is a distinction between law and morality, and a separation between the two. That said, Hart declares that Austin and Bentham also engage in legal positivism, in that the law as it is (law), and law as it ought to be (Law), is separated.1 Austin sees that there are laws which are based upon morality, such as those based upon God’s laws, and then there are man-made laws, which might, or might not, be based upon morality. Man-made laws which are not based upon reality might be benign, such as a so-called “silly law” such as the law in California that women may not drive in a house coat (dumblaws.com). That is the kind of law which Bentham would obey, yet censure.2 In other words, the law is on the books, so the citizens must obey, yet the laws are silly, so it also the citizen’s duty to attempt to get the law changed by censure. Alternatively, according to Hart (1958), there might be laws with evil intent, such as those put forth by the Nazis. It was these kinds of laws, Hart (1958) states, that led to Bentham stating that there must be some kind of civil disobedience, in that resistance to these laws must be had, not only through censure but through not obeying these laws (Hart, 1958). Hart explains that Bentham states that there are extremists in positive law, on either side of the coin. There are those extremists who see laws with which they do not agree, and, because they have a personal disagreement with the law, they opt not to follow it. These individuals are anarchists, according to Hart (1958). On the other hand, there are those who see a law, and, no matter how dumb it is, or evil it is, state that the law is the law, therefore it must not only be obeyed, but must not be criticized. This would mean that criticisms of bad laws will be “stifled…at its birth.”3 That said, Hart says that there is often an intersection between law and morality, as each mirrors the other. Laws are often based upon morals, and morals are often a reflection of laws. However, one does not follow the other – just because something is immoral does not mean that there is a law against it, and just because there is a law against something does not mean that it is immoral.4 Bentham and Austin are correct, in that morality cannot be a basis for the law, simply because morality is, often, subjective. For instance, in the United States, in the case of Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), the Supreme Court upheld a law against homosexual sodomy, partially on the basis of moral concerns, in that a large portion of society considered, and still considers, homosexuality to be immoral and a violation of God’s law. However, Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) overturned Bowers, stating that homosexual sodomy cannot be made illegal, individual beliefs about the morality of the act non-withstanding. Indeed, the United States Supreme Court has decided a number of cases in favor of the rights of the individual to engage in certain practices which are deemed immoral by wide swaths of the country – ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Jurisprudence: Positivism and the Tradition of Austin Essay”, n.d.)
Jurisprudence: Positivism and the Tradition of Austin Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1449335-jurisprudence-assignment-question-more-fundamental
(Jurisprudence: Positivism and the Tradition of Austin Essay)
Jurisprudence: Positivism and the Tradition of Austin Essay. https://studentshare.org/law/1449335-jurisprudence-assignment-question-more-fundamental.
“Jurisprudence: Positivism and the Tradition of Austin Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1449335-jurisprudence-assignment-question-more-fundamental.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Jurisprudence
On the contrary, they make resistance against all types of bondages inflicted upon them in one way or the other. The individuals and nations, not demonstrating any signs of resistance to the factors and elements imposing bars on them, lose their liberty eventually; as Call (2002)1 argues that selfish and weak yielding must always do harm.
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
Positivism
Compte himself regarded Francis Bacon, Descartes and Galileo as antecedents of his concept of human knowledge; he defined his version of ‘positive philosophy’ stating that the only existing knowledge is the one of phenomena, and that this knowledge is not absolute but relative, hence, what is known, as Mill describes it later, is neither the essence nor the real mode of production of any fact, but only its relations to other facts, which relations are constant – always the same in the same circumstances (1882).
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
Hart's Contribution to Analytical Jurisprudence
During the war, being unfit for active service, he worked in MI5. During this time his interests returned to philosophy and in 1945 he was appointed philosophy tutor at New College. He was strongly influenced by the linguistic philosophy then current in Oxford, but employed its techniques more constructively than did most members of the movement.
19 Pages(4750 words)Book Report/Review
Positivism
Positivism is concerned with the interface between concepts of rules and ideas of authority. This structure is held together by consideration of issues such as validity and obedience. Validity allows for the external legitimization of the structure. In reality, all these various forces that make up a legal structure are in a dynamic equilibrium with one another.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Jurisprudence
Thus, the sets of laws and concept of jurisprudence came into existence. “Society develops”, Katers views, “because of the need for people to use the
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Positivism
These problems were most evident in the legal systems of eighteenth century Europe. The classical criminology approach defined both a motive behind committing a crime, and methods for its control, and was an improvement of the justice system from the harsh and unlawful
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Jurisprudence
To which in the state of Nature there are many things wanting.”1 Locke reckons in his Book I chapter II that “Men are not naturally feel free”2. This signifies that men always look upward to a higher power to take care of
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Jurisprudence
Jurists and scholars have clearly opined that society has its own natural or organic process of transformation. Society never changes according to the nature of law; rather to retain the issues of social control and harmony
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
The natural law tradition is prey to objections from both moral sceptics and legal positivists. There is no moral truth against which human laws can be judged and, in any case, laws are made by humans and are not answerable to any objective conception
All these concerns have ever been argued with different personalities under different broad theories: the natural laws theory and the legal Positivist theory (Pattaro, 2007; Pg. 271; Keown and George, 2013; Pg.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Jurisprudence
The issue of terrorism and how to counter it has led to the development of various laws on human rights. There are various Acts of Parliament and regulations that have been developed to counter terrorism in a special way that
24 Pages(6000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Jurisprudence: Positivism and the Tradition of Austin for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us