Nobody downloaded yet

Product Liability and Intentional Tort - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Hypothetical Issues on Product Liability and Intentional Tort Professor Institution Hypothetic 1: Product liability issues in the case Chase’s hypothetic case of injury by the paper shredding machine within the work place touches on whether Chase should be compensated for personal injuries caused by the machine…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.7% of users find it useful
Product Liability and Intentional Tort
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Product Liability and Intentional Tort"

Download file to see previous pages The rationale for placing high liability on the sellers and manufacturers regardless of the nature of defect is that such parties are better placed to bear the cost implications of compensation. In this case, it is argued that product manufacturers and sellers can cushion themselves against losses resulting from product defects by increasing the product’s prices. Due to lack of a federal law governing product liability, the precedence for liability torts is derived from various state laws and court rulings on the general tort law. The admissibility of Chase’s case for product liability can be established by examining the threshold requirements for product liability cases and relevant court rulings. According to the Indiana Law Review, the following mandatory threshold requirements exist for a case to qualify for product liability; a product’s user/claimant who is subject to injury by the product, product’s manufacturer or seller/defendant, faulty product that is considered as unreasonably dangerous to the consumer or consumer’s property, a product reaching the consumer without alteration to its initial state and physical harm resulting from the product (Buttrick, Alberts and Thornburg, 2011:1378). Irrespective of the relevant product liability theories involved in the case, Chase’s case should meet the above criteria to qualify for admissibility (Buttrick, Alberts and Thornburg, 2011:1378). An examination of the theories upon which the product liability law is based provides insight to this hypothetical scenario. Under the theory of negligence, the manufacturer of the paper shredding machine is not liable for Chase’s injuries since there was no negligence on the manufacturer’s part or failure to remove foreseeable risk of injury to the machine’s user (Buttrick, Alberts and Thornburg, 2011:1382). In this case, the injuries incurred were as a result of negligence by the user arising from failure to read and adhere to the manufacturer’s instructions. However, the machine’s manufacturer can be held liable for Chase’s injury on the basis of the duty to warn the user against a foreseeable risk of injury by the machine (Buttrick, Alberts and Thornburg, 2011:1383). The manufacturer’s liability to provide warning to the user and whether the operation instructions were sufficient to protect Chase from injuries can be established by examining other factors like the value of the warning. In this case, the manufacturer of the paper shredding machine had the duty to provide adequate warning regarding the dangers of personal harm incase the machine is operated without lubricating oil. Under negligence rule, Chase should prove that the injuries sustained occurred despite having observed the necessary duty of care (Fischer, 2009:7). Product liability requires the injured party; Chase to demonstrate the harm-causation relationship and whether there was any breach of duty if there was any negligence by the manufacturer (Fischer, 2009:7). Though there was concrete harm on the part of Chase and the nature of causation passes the necessary “but-for” test which seeks to establish whether the harm would have otherwise occurred, the burden of proof for the manufacturer’s failure to observe the necessary duty of care lies with Chase. In this case, it is less likely for Chase to be compensated by the paper shreddi ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Product Liability and Intentional Tort Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Product Liability and Intentional Tort Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1448640-product-liability-and-intentional-tort
(Product Liability and Intentional Tort Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Product Liability and Intentional Tort Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1448640-product-liability-and-intentional-tort.
“Product Liability and Intentional Tort Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1448640-product-liability-and-intentional-tort.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Product Liability and Intentional Tort

Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim

...of product liability law suits have said that it enriches plaintiff’s attorneys and that it has added costs of sold goods. Businesses in this regard have sought the help of state legislatures and Congress in the hope that they can reduce damage awards that sometimes costs them millions of dollars (The Free dictionary, 2012). Prada drug manufacturer, Boehringer Ingelheim, is facing a court case because it allegedly failed to warn consumers of side effects of drugs. This paper gives an analysis of product liability law suits in relation to this company. Theories of Liability Negligence In most scenarios, a plaintiff’s cause of action can be based on four...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Four Intentional Torts Negilence and Liability

...? Intentional Torts Negligence and Liability Intentional Torts Negligence and Liability John and Juliet had been friends since theywere young. Upon completion of their high school education, they parted ways. John went abroad for his university education while Juliet remained in the country. For the time that John knew Juliet, he knew that Juliet loved dolls. When he returned home from his studies, John decided to surprise Juliet. Coincidentally, the following day after his return from abroad was Juliet’s birthday. Therefore, he found it the right time to visit and surprise her with a birthday present. However, he did not know that her...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Elements of Crime and Intentional Tort

...Elements of Crime and Intentional Tort -U1-IP What did Bidder's Edge do that was different than eBay's normal s Why does it matter to eBay According to the article, Bidder Edge did something that was different from what eBay's customer did. Even though the eBay site was accessible to the public at large, they had allowed limited access to their customers. Bidder Edge had a hit of 80,000-100,000 per day which was harming the eBay's system to be slow, data loss and even system unavailability. This was not how eBay intended their customer to use their server as they were allowing their customers only a limited access to it. What is the definition of traditional trespass to personal property The traditional definition of trespass... to...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Warranties and Product Liability

...laws or federal laws. Example of this is today's law which requires the producer of the goods to aid the vendees to find resolution to problems concerning the products bought as well as to furnish complete warranty information to all vendees before they make decisions to buy the product . Product LiabilityProduct liability is responsibility imposed by law or manufacturers and sellers for physical harm or property damage caused by their defective products to consumers, users and bystanders (Miller 2005, p.394). The remedies available are found in laws on...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Product Safety and Product Liability

...leading to the damage occurred and irrespective of the country or countries in which the indirect consequences of that event occur.” This rule thus refers to the place of damage occurrence, rather than the place the product causing the tort arose. The direct translation of this is that the damage or tort arises in one country, and litigation takes place in another country. Some scholars have argued that the provisions of Article 4 (1) are overly uncertain, and thus a source of problems and confusion with regard to jurisdiction.7 The European court was called upon to give an interpretation as to the concept of liabilities in the case of Bier vs. Mines de potasse...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Differentiate between neligence, intentional and constitutional torts. What act(s) can cause a tort liability

...Tort Affiliation Tort The word tort is referred to the act of injuring an individual conducted by another individual. Various lawsuits are pursued against a practitioner of the system of the criminal justice and these law suits are mainly tort lawsuits. Tort lawsuits are of mainly three kinds and these kinds of tort cases are defended in several instances by the professionals of criminal justice. Three kinds include: constitutional, negligence and intentional torts. Criminal justice officials have to fight a negligence tort if they are creating a danger to the wellbeing of citizens (Peak,...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Product Liability

...Product Liability The U.S Companies should be liable. The companies should have the responsibility of ensuring their products are safe. They must be held liable for placing products with defects knowing very well they will be used by individuals. This happens for the company fails to carry out the required inspections to ensure all products do not have defects. Anyone that allows the product to be available in the market without proper investigations on the products is held liable if they cause any injury or damage to consumers. The companies will be held liable since the release of the product to the market shows high levels of negligence and lack of consumer protection. Since the retailers utilize raw ingredients yet they know... that they...
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper

Product Liability Lawsuit against Toyota

...Product Liability Lawsuit against Toyota With the emergence of the concept of societal marketing, the deviation between quality and expectation has been narrowed down. The awareness extent among the customers or purchasers has created a real deal for manufacturers as well as for the law enforcement authorities. In the near past, history sighted a very strange phenomenon with a vehicle manufacturing company which is one of the top car manufacturers. It is the turn point towards Toyota incorporation (Rowe, 2011). They had to call the sold vehicles back due to foot break design fault. The issue was basically raised back in 2009 after a horrible accident in San Diego that killed a family of four members who were travelling in Lexus... level...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Ford Pinto Product Liability Case

...Task: Ford Pinto Product Liability Introduction Product liability is one of the legal liabilities manufacturers, producers and retailers are held responsible for when their products cause harm to third parties and consumers in the market. This happens when the company is found to have been negligent in producing the product to be sold to the public without taking precaution measures in design or manufacturing process. In addition, the products may have caused injury due to lack of warning labels of the associated risks when using the product or insufficient guidelines (LexisNexis, 2013)....
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Product Liability Case

...Product Liability Case Product Liability Case Product liability cases have in recent years seen a significant increase, especiallyin terms of injuries filed in court by people who, despite undergoing minimally invasive surgery, develop serious cartilage damage. The U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently revived a case filed by Christina McClellan after suffering an injury caused by a shoulder pain pump, overturning a decision made by the district court. Christina McClellan underwent surgery on her troublesome shoulder twice in 2004, during which her attendants had administered pain killers using the “PainBuster” device...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Product Liability and Intentional Tort for FREE!

Contact Us