UK Corporate Governance Law - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The UK Corporate Governance Law is instituted to enhance the understanding and level of cooperation between the business board members and the shareholders, so that each may deliver their duties to the best interest of the company, and can openly and honestly share ideas and opinions…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.5% of users find it useful
UK Corporate Governance Law
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "UK Corporate Governance Law"

Harris Kamran Corporate Law Analysis 9 April UK Corporate Governance Law The UK Corporate Governance Law is instituted to enhance the understanding and level of cooperation between the business board members and the shareholders, so that each may deliver their duties to the best interest of the company, and can openly and honestly share ideas and opinions (FRC 2010). The recent revisions made in the Law were required to ensure a greater application of the law, both in the letter and in the spirit, and a greater ease of flow of information between the shareholders and the board (FRC 2010: 2). It is the responsibility of the shareholders to elect the directors of the board, and it is the job of the directors to draft a working plan and company policy for the business, and see through the execution of that plan (FRC 2010: 1). At the end of each financial year, the directors are required to write an annual report in which they are to explain to the shareholders exactly how the governance law was incorporated into their business plan (FRC 2010: 1). The ultimate concept is transparency and fair dealing. It is better that the chairman write this section of the report so that a first-hand knowledge about the law could be supplied to the shareholders (FRC 2010: 3). The report should include detailed account of the manner in which the law was incorporated into the business, and if some of the provisions were not, then it should mention which provisions were those, whether they were continuous or discontinuous, and the reason for non-compliance of the provisions, according to the comply or explain rule (FRC 2010: 30). To make the pertinent information more detailed, the report should include a descriptive analysis of the framework of the board, and the procedure for its working. To start with, it should include the names of the chairman and the deputy chairman, the executive director and the senior independent director, and the chairmen and members of the various committees of the board (FRC 2010: 31). It should also record the attendance of the individual directors in all the meetings, and the total number of meetings that the board has had in that year (FRC 2010: 31). In case the independent director is non-executive, it should explain the reason for it (FRC 2010: 31). The report should also highlight the responsibilities of the board and those of the management of the company, and should make a clear demarcation between the two (FRC 2010: 31). The election or nomination of the various directors and chairmen by the committee should be explained in a separate section (FRC 2010: 31). The process for evaluation of this nomination and the candidates should be given in the report (FRC 2010: 31). Personal statements of the directors about their job of writing the accounts and the auditors about their reporting of those accounts should be included (FRC 2010: 31). The directors should then explain the business strategy that they adopted to reach the company objectives in that fiscal year (FRC 2010: 31). They should also include the company’s fall-back plan, its risk management and internal control systems (FRC 2010: 32). A separate section should deal with the working of the auditors, explaining their procedure and the reasons for it (FRC 2010: 32). In case an internal auditing service is absent and an external auditor is recruited, the reason should be explained and details should be given (FRC 2010: 32). Also, if there is a disparity between the board and the auditors about the decision regarding an external auditor, it should be mentioned, along with the reasons for such a difference of stance (FRC 2010: 32). There should be mention of remunerations, and the method by which the role of shareholders in the company is explained to the directors for a greater understanding (FRC 2010: 32). The board should explain to the shareholders, either in the report or separately by setting up a company website, the different roles and responsibilities of the remuneration, nomination, and auditing committees, and their references; the grounds for the nomination and selection of the various directors; the evaluation process, and the grounds for selection of the external evaluator, and his connection with the company; and when a remuneration consultant is recruited, the reasons for such service, and the connection between the company and the consultant (FRC 2010: 32). When the shareholders have to elect or re-elect non-executive directors, the board should provide them with detailed biographical information about each candidate, the reasons for nomination by the board, and the evaluation of service of the candidate to the company, so that the shareholders can make an informed decision (FRC 2010: 33). This flow of information between the board and the shareholders should be maintained so that there is transparency in the business, to the best interest of the company. Bibliography FRC. June 2010. The UK Corporate Governance Code. [Online]. FRC. Available: [9 April 2012]. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“UK Corporate Governance Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(UK Corporate Governance Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“UK Corporate Governance Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF UK Corporate Governance Law

Corporate Governance in UK

...specifically emphasises on the interests of workers, customers, managers, and suppliers whereas the Anglo-American corporate governance model values shareholder interests. However, every organisation takes into account the rights and privileges of its shareholders while framing its corporate governance policies. In addition, a corporate governance framework clearly states the roles and responsibilities of the board of directors, integrity and ethical standards of the organisation, and concerns of disclosure and transparency. It is observed that corporate governance practices vary from organisation to...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment

The UK Corporate Governance Code

.... Available at: UK%20Corp%20Gov%20Code%20June%202010.pdf> [Accessed at: 19-Dec-2011] FINANCIAL REPORTING COUNCIL, 2011, Consultation Document: Gender Diversity On Board, Available at: [Accessed at: 20-Dec-11] BARRY D. BAYSINGER & HENRY N.BUTLER 1985, Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Spring, 1985), pp. 101-124  (article consists of 24 pages), Published by: Oxford University Press, Stable URL: KLEIN... ?CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The UK...
11 Pages(2750 words)Coursework

Corporate Governance Law

...? CORPORATE GOVERNANCE LAW Corporate Governance Law Introduction Corporate governance is a system that has gained prominence in the management of organizations across the world and plays a critical role in facilitating organizations to be effective and efficient hence attainment of organizational goals and objectives. According to Turnbull (1999, p. 189), corporate governance is defined as executive procedures and structural organization that is used to manage and direct business towards ensuring financial stability and achievement of objectives....
12 Pages(3000 words)Assignment

Corporate governance - Law

...corporate Governancec Code. P 9-26 Hogg, C. 2010. The “Comply or Explain” Approach to Improving Standards of Corporate Governance. Q Finance. P 1. Kiarie, S. 2007. Non-executive directors in UK Listed Companies: are they effective? International Company and Commercial Law Review. Issue 17. Sweet & Maxwel. Pp 2-6 Miles, L. and Jones, M. 2009. The Prospects of Corporate Governance Operating as a Vehicle For Social Change in South Africa. Deakin Law Review. 14(1). Pp 53- 70 Owen, G. January 2001. Corporate governance in Britain: is incremental reform...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

UK Corporate Governance Code

...of the stakeholders concerned while allowing profit-making institutions to flourish (Alpaslan et al. 2009). Bibliography Alpaslan, C. M.; Green, S. E. & Mitroff, I. I. 2009. Corporate Governance in the Context of Crises: Towards a Stakeholder Theory of Crisis Management. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p38-49. Apostolides, N. 2008. Exercising corporate governance at the annual general meeting. Corporate Governance. Vol. 10, p 140-149. Barker, R. 2008. The UK Model of Corporate Governance: An Assessment from the Midst of a Financial Crisis. Financial Times,...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

The UK and USA Corporate Governance frameworks are predicated on fundamentally different approach to principal/stakeholder prote

...performance (Holmstrom and Kaplan 2001, p. 135-136). U.S. business scandals that occurred during the 1980s---particularly those related to government contracts---gave rise to emphasis on rules in corporate governance (Hurst 2004, p. 6). The emphasis on US corporate governance that emerged from the scandals of the 1980s revolved compliance with national land local laws and regulations (Hurst 2004, p. 6). IV. Principles-Based Corporate Governance in the UK and 1990-2002 Armour (2008, p. 39) pointed out that the structure of English Corporate Law gives...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Corporate Governance Law Paper

...task and responsibility. Primordial of this responsibility is to ensure that the interest of the stockholders is not only upheld at all times, but it is also his responsibility to ensure that the company remains and becomes a good corporate citizen while complying with fealty to applicable government regulations. His responsibility also includes harmonizing the efforts of the entire organization to enable it to meet its targets while ensuring that its partners and other stakeholders are also focused towards attaining the organization’s goals. The divergent interests of these groups most of the time run contrary to each other, thus the Chief Executive Officer most of the time also acts as a consensus...
7 Pages(1750 words)Term Paper

Company Law - corporate governance

...efficiency and competitiveness. The corporate governance is employing many strategies to secure managerial qualities and skills from directors and the employees. Some changes are made in case law (company Law), to make the strategies of the companies and the aspirations of the stake holders to fulfilled. In this manner the case law should deal with the sincerity, diligence of the directors and the skills of the employees. The consequences when the policy of the company makes a director a victim or a loop hole in a law makes the company pay compensation for the victim on behalf of the employee can be examined. The points and the...
14 Pages(3500 words)Essay

Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance

...customers of the company. That is why employees are prohibited from engaging in such promotions. A similar clause is applicable to family members of the employees, but this varies from company to company. Also, the corporation has to specify this clause in the promotional campaign. This is usually mentioned in fine print though. Question 4 When a company initiates a promotional campaign, it also establishes terms of the promotions. This includes the validity of the offer, the necessary clauses etc. In the eyes of law, these terms of agreement will act as a binding statute for the company and it will have to fulfill any and all obligations which are encompassed within the terms and conditions. The extent...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment

Corporate governance in the uk

... the companies regarding risk management strategy. Risk committee should review risk management strategy of banks and insurance companies by taking into account all the financial, economic, macro and micro environmental factors. Risk committee should include CEO, CFO of companies in order to take decisions regarding risk management issue of corporate governance in a holistic manner. Reference Allen, W. T., 1992. Our Schizophrenic Conception of the Business Corporation. Cardozo Law Review, 14(2), pp. 261-281. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants., 2009. A Review of Corporate Governance in UK Banks and Other Financial Industry Entities. Comments from ACCA. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 12... Corporate...
8 Pages(2000 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic UK Corporate Governance Law for FREE!

Contact Us