Nobody downloaded yet

Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co Date: Introduction Tort law exists to ensure that businesses and entrepreneurial undertakings are exacted within the provisions of the law and that fraud, debauchery and breach of contract are kept under, in the business world…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.6% of users find it useful
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co"

Download file to see previous pages This is because; there are laws that explicitly spell out the obligation of corporate entities in ensuring public safety and the responsibility these entities are to be charged with, when these standards are not met. One of the most significant law of tort cases in the US is the Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (N.Y. 1928). The case can aptly be described as significant since its effects shaped and established the concepts of the scope of business liability, the relevance of proximate cause and the limits of negligence. A Brief Summary on the Case At the heart of the case is Mrs. Helen Palsgraf who was waiting on a Long Island Railway train platform, until two men approached running after a train. As a security officer helped one of the men get on board, the man dropped his package. Since this luggage contained explosives, an explosion of a very powerful scale resulted there-from. This resulted in Palsgraf’s injury. Mrs. Palsgraf entered a personal injury lawsuit against the company, Long Island Railroad. The two main issues that emerged from the case are: the manner of determination of the duty of care; and the person to whom the party owes its duty of due care. In this case, the Court of Appeals ruled against the favor of Mrs. Palsgraf. The court maintained that there was no direct relationship between the guard’s action (of pulling the second passenger on board) and Palsgraf’s injury. The crux of the matter is that there has to be a direct nexus between the guard’s action and Mrs. Palsgraf’s injury, in order for liability to be cited. The Senior Judge Benjamin Cardozo, while writing for the three-judge bench, maintained that the guard in no way was aware of the presence of the explosion in the package. Therefore, by shoving the passenger inside, he was not aware that an explosion would ensue. Cardozo continued that even the most cautious mind could not guess the presence of danger in the package. Moreover, there was no way the soldier’s action of pushing the passenger into the train directly affected Mrs. Palsgraf. Cardozo affirmed that not only was the harm emanating from the guard not willful, but his act was also not in itself dangerous. This is to the effect that the act of pushing the passenger into the train was not in violation to Palsgraf’s rights (Cross, 2011). Personal Opinion about the Case and How It Relates To What Is Being Learnt On personal grounds, the case was justly ruled by Senior Judge Cardozo and the three-judge bench. Palsgraf’s claims in her personal injury legal suit against Long Island Railroad are not sustainable, on several grounds. Lessons that have been drawn from classroom context underscore this standpoint. One of the lessons gleaned from the classroom lectures is that of the limitations of negligence. Generally, to find negligence, there must be a total finding of an instance where a particular duty owed was breached. In respect to the foregoing, to find negligence with Long Island Railroad, evidence must be produced on the side of the company’s personnel. There is no clear relationship between the guard’s action and Mrs. Palsgraf’s injury so that he can be accused of negligence. In a closely related wavelength, the limitations of liability require that the injury or liability sustained must have been avoidable, should the defendant have acted responsibly. This aspect of making harm avoidable is only applicable in light of knowledge. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/law/1447331-case-studies
(Palsgraf V. Long Island Railroad Co Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1447331-case-studies.
“Palsgraf V. Long Island Railroad Co Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1447331-case-studies.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co

Keegan v Newcastle United Football Co Ltd

...? CASE of Kevin Keegan v Newcastle United Football Club Ltd Premier League Manager's Arbitration Tribunal 20 October 2009 2009 WL 5641054 Philip Havers QC (Chairman) Lord Pannick QC Kenneth Merrett 1 October 2009 Introduction In this case, Keegan v Newcastle United Football Co Ltd, the claimant is Kevin Keegan (former football manager) and the respondent is the Newcastle United Football Co Ltd. The legal issue concerns constructive dismissal of the manager and the fundamental terms of employment contract, a breach of which entitled him to succeed on constructive dismissal claim. The Arbitration Tribunal declared that Kevin Keegan was constructively dismissed by the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Transcontinental railroad

...of the deception created by Thomas Durant who wanted to provide the government and the general public with an impression that the company had been disinterestedly chosen by the officers of the Union Pacific Railroad. Union Pacific was paying Credit Mobilier for the costs of the construction, however in reality Durant was paying himself without any oversight by a third party. This deception went on for a long time and the costs of construction kept mounting (Ambrose, 2000). The investors acquired stock in the Union Pacific and one of those investors was Thomas Durant. He manipulated the whole project by acquiring excessive stock illegally and then created Credit Mobilier which brought the project to a...
10 Pages(2500 words)Term Paper

Palsgraf v. The Long Island Railroad

...?Palsgraf v. The Long Island Railroad 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99, 1928 N.Y.Lexis 1269 (N.Y Most courts still apply Cardozo’s point of view regardingcausation (Beatty & Samuelson, 154). In this case, the Court through Justice Cardozo ruled essentially that the defendant guard’s conduct in helping one of the passengers board the train whose package fell, “was not a wrong in its relation to the plaintiff, standing far away” (Palsgraf v. the Long Island Railroad). The package wrapped in a newspaper contained fireworks which exploded and which struck the plaintiff, causing...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Walt Disney Co. V. Beijing Publishing Press

...?Walt Disney Co. V. Beijing Publishing Press This case involves an infringement of intellectual property rights. Intellectual property involves creations of the mind, artistic work, symbols, names, or images used in commerce. Intellectual property has two divisions in that it includes industrial property such as trademarks and industrial designs. In addition, it includes copyrights that comprise literary work such as novels, poems, films, and performances. Intellectual property rights (IPR) as any other right gives the owners of intangible assets like patents, trademarks, and copyrights the freedom to enjoy from their own creations. IPR is protected by Article 27 of the Universal Declaration Of Human...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC

...? WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION CO. V. OSHRC Introduction The case anchors on the laws and policies of OSHRC – an occupations Health and Security Regulation. The act aims to guarantee employees safety and security while at work. The regulations in the act are implemented to aid reduce the percentage of workstation deaths and injuries. In the Williams construction industry case, the company was subjected to some investigations following the collapse of a trench that caused the death of one worker and acute injuries of another employee. After a serious investigation, the company was charged with some Occupational Safety and Health offences, which lead to expensive penalties. Discussion The paper will investigate...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Case Brief: LONG ISLAND CARE AT HOME, LTD v. COKE, 551 US 158 (2007)

...?Case Brief: LONG ISLAND CARE AT HOME, LTD v. COKE, 551 US 158 (2007) AND CITATION The of the case is Long Island Care At Home, Ltd v. Coke. As can be observed from the title, the respondent is Evelyn Coke and the petitioner is Long Island Care at Home Ltd. Correspondingly, Long Island Care at Home Ltd is the opposing party to the claims made by Evelyn Coke. The citation for this case is Long Island Care At Home, Ltd v. Coke, 551 US 158 (2007) (Cornell University Law School, “Supreme Court”). FACTS OF THE CASE...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Care Co-ordination for Long Term Conditions

...t Care Co- ordination for Long term conditions Introduction The aim of the report - Long term conditions, role of the AP, discussion on care packages pros and cons of implementations. Aim: The aim of this report is to lay emphasis on difficulties faced in caring for children with long term conditions, one in particular being tracheomalacia. It also highlights the new role of assistant practitioners as defined by the Department of health and provides a discussion on the various care packages. These care packages as being used in the pre treatment and treatment of phases of children with long term conditions. With an analysis weighing the pros and cons of...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Railroad

..., and mechanics. For example, there were 15 to 20 stalls for servicing engines and a turntable in Brewster (Drury 89-91). The system grew until it had 10,000 mi (16,000 km) of track linking New York with Boston, Montreal, Chicago, and St. Louis. Through the late 19th and early 20th centuries the railroads in the United States became very powerful, and with power came political interests and economic abuses. The Federal government, as a result, started to heavily regulate the railroads, including freight rates and passenger ticket prices. Government regulation and the coming of the airplane and automobile, led to the decline of the railroads in the 20th century. The airplane could move...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Ecology Of Long Island Sound

...___________ ____________ ____July 2007 The Effect Of Human Activity On The Ecology Of Long Island Sound 1. Introduction The interaction of the man with the elements of nature has been a subject of intense debate and argument. In fact, this issue has gained such importance that most industrial and economic activities are begun with this issue at the roots. Literature has tremendous support, clarifying this issue as Bott, Cantrill & Myers (2003) state with appropriate literature support, “Relationship to place is a fundamental feature of human existence. This relationship, in broadest terms, is as various and extensive as are human interactions with their surroundings. But while some of these...
53 Pages(13250 words)Essay

Underground Railroad

...Underground Railroad In 1834, The National Antislavery Society came up with the secretive idea of organizing an Underground Railroad. The effort composed of both the whites and black abolitionists whose aim was to free as many slaves as possible. These were groups that were against slavery and they felt that there was a need to come up with more effective measures to end this vice. The idea was actualized in 1838 with a well organized Underground Railroad having been developed. Robert Purvis was on the helm of this idea. Through the directions that were provided by the agents, thousands of slaves were able to escape from their masters. These Underground Railroads...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co for FREE!

Contact Us