StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Fundamentals of Business Law: The Tort of Negligence - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
"Fundamentals of Business Law: The Tort of Negligence" paper focuses on the omission to do something that a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily negotiate the conduct of human affairs would do or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.5% of users find it useful
Fundamentals of Business Law: The Tort of Negligence
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Fundamentals of Business Law: The Tort of Negligence"

Download file to see previous pages In the fair child's case, the industrial employers had a duty of care towards the employees in ensuring that:-

A man purchased a bottle of ginger-beer from a shop to be used by his girlfriend. But the bottle in which the beer was contained was opaque and it was impossible to clearly see its contents. It was later found that the beer contained remains of a snail on pouring out the beer. The girlfriend got sick and sued the manufacturer for damages in tort. It was held that the defendant was liable since he owed her a duty of care to ensure that the bottle should contain any other objects apart from the beer itself.

Under the tort of negligence, the plaintiff cannot successfully sue the defendant unless he/she proofs that he was injured. Even if the damage is evident, the plaintiff must also prove that he suffered injury directly attributable to the damage. The plaintiff might suffer injury not directly attributable to the damage. If this is the case, his action will fail. 2
In Fairchild's case, the workers inhaled excessive asbestos and contracted mesothelioma, cancer associated with the inhalation of such substances. The injury here is this disease suffered. This would give the worker an automatic way to sue their employers for damages. The situation would have changed had the workers not contracted the disease or any injury of a similar nature. The employers know very well that excessive inhalation of the asbestos would cause the disease but they did not take reasonable steps to avoid it.

Standard of Care

Apart from just the duty of care that one owes his neighbor in his actions that he ought to have him in contemplation, there are cases where the standard of care need to be shown. The courts have the burden to prove whether the defendants had a standard of care.

A standard of care is thus expected from an ordinarily prudent person in a given situation. If a person has placed himself or made others believe that he can execute a given task, then he owes his clients a standard of care to do such a task without harming the client. A doctor for an instant in a reputable hospital owes a patient a standard of care and should carry out his work expected of a doctor from such a hospital and expect to be given such a standard of care. 3

Causation of Damage under Negligence

The general rule under negligence is that the burden of proofing negligence would lie on the plaintiff. But in case of accidents in the workplace, the plaintiff need not prove negligence if that accident could not have occurred were the defendant not negligent.

In such cases, the plaintiff relies on the principle of 'Res Ipsa Loquitor" i.e.; let the facts speak by themselves. The burden of proof then shifts to the defendant. The defendant would then convince the courts that the accident would still have occurred without his own negligence. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Fundamentals of Business Law: The Tort of Negligence Case Study, n.d.)
Fundamentals of Business Law: The Tort of Negligence Case Study. https://studentshare.org/law/1500788-law-of-tort-fundamentals-of-business-law
(Fundamentals of Business Law: The Tort of Negligence Case Study)
Fundamentals of Business Law: The Tort of Negligence Case Study. https://studentshare.org/law/1500788-law-of-tort-fundamentals-of-business-law.
“Fundamentals of Business Law: The Tort of Negligence Case Study”. https://studentshare.org/law/1500788-law-of-tort-fundamentals-of-business-law.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Fundamentals of Business Law: The Tort of Negligence

Tort of Negligence

...Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... of the of the Concerned Law November Tort of Negligence Part A It goes without saying that the concept of negligence is central to the English Tort system of liability. To put it in simple words, the notion of negligence in the English Tort Law is primarily based on the commonsensical notion that in all aspects of the social life, be it professional or personal, an individual ought to resort to a minimal standard of ordinary care so as to look to it that one’s activities do not cause any harm to others. Since times immemorial, the very quintessential element that constituted the foundations of law is that each and every person is...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Negligence and tort law

...Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Negligence and tort law of Outline 0 Part I 1 Negligence and tort Law 1.2 Structure of Negligence 1.3 Duty of Care 1.4 Breach of duty 1.5 Legal and Factual Causation 1.6 Harm 1.7 Damages 2.0 Part II 2.1 Case analysis 3.0 Conclusion 4.0 References PART I Negligence and tort law The branch of Tort law covering negligence involves harm that results from a failure to take due care that a prudent person in the same circumstance as the tortfeasor would have.it is part of English Common Law and as such its development is hinged on judicial decisions. It does not cover injury that results from intentional harm. The core idea is that people should ...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Foreseeability. Negligence and Tort

...Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... FORESEEABILITY Foreseeability Control over a Third Party The establishment of negligence claims relies heavily on the specific relationships between parties. Negligence claims against a third party, under omissions and acts, can only be imposed when all the elements of negligence claims have been proved. In an event that the plaintiff fails to prove any one element, then he or she loses the entire tort of negligence claim. The following elements should be proved: factual and legal causation, duty of care, damages, and breach of duty. The essence of existence of specific relationship between parties to establish negligence claims is based...
12 Pages(3000 words)Assignment

Law - Tort of Negligence

...Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Tort of negligence of Institute Introduction Though Castle Cricket Club has remedy in contract as there was no consideration given it can still sue Brunel under the tort of negligence. The tort of negligence is a tort that awards damages for a breach of duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff resulting in damage to the plaintiff undesired by the defendant (Keenan, 2007. P. 265). The tort of negligence was created in the House of Lords in 1932. Before then, the courts studied the circumstances of the case and so if there was precedent and decided, based on all these, if the plaintiff was entitled to redress. Tort of negligence There...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Business Law- Law of Negligence

...Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Tort of negligence occur where the following elements exist and can be proven duty of care and the breach of thereof, causation, and the damage itself (Mann et al, 2009). These elements have to be proven for a negligence case to be successful; however, the most essential element is duty of care. There are two types of duty of care, duties that are recognized by law and duty imposed by circumstances (Miller & Jentz, 2003). In addition, there is the issue of whether a certain risk was foreseeable; in which case, if it was not foreseeable the person responsible for the damage cannot be liable. Helen’s claim for her injuries and lost earnings ...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Fundamentals of Business Law

...Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Business Law Table of Contents Introduction 3 (i) Definition and Explanation of Consideration in relation to the Law of Contract 3 (ii) Critical Evaluation of the Consideration Statements 5 (a)Consideration Must Be Sufficient but Does Not Have to Be Adequate 5 (b)Past Consideration is Not Good Consideration 7 Conclusion 9 References 10 Introduction A contract can be defined as an agreement wherein two parties are mutually agreed to accomplish any task through adhering certain rules and guidelines. An effective contract engages various aspects including laws along with policies, security concerns, payment related issues, notice to commence ...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Psychiatrict-negligence in Tort Law

...Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Psychiatry-Negligence in Tort Law For tortuous claims of liability in a negligence case to be successful, various basic pre-requisites require immediate and keen consideration. The requirements of the contemporary tort stipulation of negligence appeared in a case that is under assessment in this explication, whether the claimants deserve rightful damages for their asserted claims of negligent psychological injury. This study shall immensely rely on various tests and examinations, based on current tort law, to draw reasonable conclusions regarding whether the primary, secondary, and tertiary victims in this case should receive damages from ...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

The Tort of Negligence

...Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Law In respect to Maggie’s situation, it is possible that the tort of negligence can be applied against Shoddy Contractors. The company can be held vicariously liable for the negligent actions of its employees in drilling through the cables in Maggie’s apartment. There may also be a cause of action in tort that could exist against Globalnet Computers who have provided her with defective goods. The duty of care that exists in negligence is laid out in Caparo Industries v Dickman1where it was held that damage arising out an action should be (a) foreseeable (b) there must be a relationship of sufficient proximity between the parties and ...
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study

Tort of Negligence

...Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... of Negligence Duty deals with relationships. In tort cases, the claimant must show that the defendant was under a relationship with him, which obliged the former to provide him with proper care. In the legal context duty is referred to as proximity. Mere foresight is insufficient for establishing a claim for damages. There must be closer relationship between the parties for claiming compensation for certain types of damage. In cases of tort of negligence, a very important element is foresight of damage1. In order to prove that there is a tort of negligence had occurred, the claimant must prove that the defendant was under a duty of care....
9 Pages(2250 words)Coursework

Tort - Negligence Assessment

...Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Fundamentals of Business Law The Tort of Negligence... Part Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990 All ER 568 Question This case was heard in the House of Lords. Question 2 The date the court delivered its judgment was on 8th February 1990. Question 3 The first six catchwords in the report are the plaintiffs, the defendant, the judge/ jury, duty of care, common law and liability. In this case, the plaintiff is Caparo Industries Plc. The defendant is Dickman and the duty of care in this case may be the need for Dickman to disclose accurate information on Fidelity Plc’s profit margin. The jury involved in the case consist of Lord Bridge of Harwich, Lord Ackner, Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle, L...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic Fundamentals of Business Law: The Tort of Negligence for FREE!

Contact Us