Nobody downloaded yet

Oracle vs. Google Lawsuit (Android and Java) - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Oracle America Inc. vs. Google Inc. Last August 2010, Oracle filed a lawsuit against Google before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for infringement of seven of its patented technologies and one claim of copyright infringement…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.4% of users find it useful
Oracle vs. Google Lawsuit (Android and Java)
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Oracle vs. Google Lawsuit (Android and Java)"

Download file to see previous pages Google’s Android infringes Oracle America’s copyrights in Java and Google is not licensed to do so. The seven patented technologies in question are: 6,125,447 (Protection Domains To Provide Security in a Computer System); 6, 192,476 (Controlling Access to Resource); 5,966,702 (Method and Apparatus for Preloading of Classes Through Memory Space Cloning of a Master Runtime System Process; RE38,104 (Method And Apparatus For Resolving Data References In Generate Code - A reissued patent; the original number was 5,367,685); 6,910,205 (Interpreting Functions Utilizing A Hybrid Of Virtual And Native Machine Instructions); and, 6,061,520 (Method And System for Performing Static Initialization) (EndSoft Patents 2012). The Java technology was developed by Sun Microsystems now called Oracle America, after its acquisition by Oracle. The deal, valued at $7.4 billion, strengthened Oracle’s objective to out-consolidate its rivals, which was already buoyed by previous acquisition of several large companies (Shankland 2010). Because of this, Oracle became a hardware company as well, with an integrated product being pitched to the customers as a combination of hardware and software solution. Android is a Google product, developed in its move to expand in the mobile computing market. It was originally created by Android Inc., which Google bought in 2005. Today, Android is being maintained and developed by the Open Handset Alliance, which is a consortium of 86 hardware, software and telecommunications organizations led by Google. Legal Issues Oracle’s claims of code infringement had been modified in October 2010, which further specified its complaint against Android. In its amended claim filed before the court, Oracle alleged that Google flagship operating system is using or copying Java technologies in its class libraries and documentation, further stressing that approximately one-third of Android’s API packages are “derivative” of the Java API packages, including examples of code that aim to prove its point (Lopez-Tarruella, 2012, 279). For Google’s alleged copyright and patent infringement, Oracle originally asked for over $2.4 billion in order to compensate for the damages, which, of course, Google countered as inflated (Latif 2012). Oracle has revised this figure as it amended its complaints several times. Today, it stands at $168 million. Google still think the figures as baseless. In a legal strategy designed to fend off attacks or at least protect its Android ecosystem from lawsuits such as that lodged by Oracle, Google has acquired Motorola Mobility its trove of patented mobile and computing technologies, in addition to the thousands acquired from IBP Patents. The rationale for this move is simple. With a comprehensive range of important mobile and future mobile technologies, Google is in a better position to protect the companies that use Android because it could threaten Oracle with counter license suits. Also, Google could refuse to license technologies to companies such as Microsoft, Nokia and perhaps Oracle if it starts its own mobile computing program in the future. Finally, Google – through its newly acquired patents - could enter into cross-licensing deals with these companies in exchange for dropping the lawsuits or being amenable ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Oracle vs. Google Lawsuit (Android and Java) Research Paper”, n.d.)
Oracle vs. Google Lawsuit (Android and Java) Research Paper. Retrieved from
(Oracle Vs. Google Lawsuit (Android and Java) Research Paper)
Oracle Vs. Google Lawsuit (Android and Java) Research Paper.
“Oracle Vs. Google Lawsuit (Android and Java) Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Oracle vs. Google Lawsuit (Android and Java)


...?Java Programming Access Modifiers a) Difference between public, protected and private Members (variables, methods or declared private can be accessed only by the members of the same class. Accessing a private member outside the enclosing class will result in variable declaration error. In other words, private members are strictly bound within the limits of its declaring class. Members defined with protected modifier can be accessed by classes outside the enclosing class but within the same package. However members declared protected in super class can be accessed by its subclasses, but only if they are present in same package. Members declared public have no bounds, they can be accessed from anywhere by any class...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Google android analysis

...?Google Android Case Analysis 13-5 The Following Questions are Equally Weighted Google purchased Android in 2005 for a small, undisclosed amount of money. Why did Google choose to enter the market this way? In the year 2005 when Google chose to make the Android company as part of its own the outside world of smart phones was overwhelmed by existing giants like iphone and Microsoft. It was in their acclaimed presence that a noisy inclusion into the market might not have been able to bloom to its fullest. The publicity it would’ve gained would’ve involved severe comparisons with tried and tested counterparts. Any lacking on...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Google vs. Yahoo

...system (Android), online book store (Google books), personal health records (Google health), etc. On the other hand, Yahoo has search engine business, Yahoo finance, web hosting and E-commerce etc. Google Inc. started as a search engine on the World Wide Web in the month of September, 1997 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin. On the other hand Yahoo’s history started when “The two founders of Yahoo!, David Filo and Jerry Yang, Ph.D. candidates in Electrical Engineering at Stanford University, started their guide in a campus trailer in February 1994 as a way to keep track of their personal interests on the Internet” (The History of Yahoo! - How It All Started..., 2005). Yet...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay


...the product with the motto of mobile devices that are smarter in their functionality and facilitate its users in terms of their choices and locations. What started off as an amateur venture by the two individuals, in few years time it caught the attention of Google Inc, and Google inc decided to purchase it, the case grew further strong when Open Handheld Alliance (O.H.A) incorporated Android operating system into its systems and services. O.H.A itself is a giant entity that has over 80 international brands under its umbrella all working in the field of communication, computers and services. These include H.T.C, Samsung to name a few. The O.H.A and android together aim...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay


...Boxes and tubes application (enter and here) April 15, Contents Contents 2 BOXES AND TUBES JAVA APPLICATION HOW THE APPLICATION WORKS. 1. DESIGN The application has been developed using Netbeans® IDE 7.1.1 Netbeans® IDE 7.1.1 is an open source Integrated Development Environment that enables easy and rapid development of web, enterprise and desktop applications using Java and other many other platforms. Advantages of using Netbeans® IDE 7.1.1 includes Enables full compile, debug and profile development for Java applications Provides Swing GUI Builder enhancements and Swing debugging tools. It’s available in many different languages. It is open source and easily available. 2....
4 Pages(1000 words)Coursework

PeopleSoft vs. Oracle

...included mass firing of employees due to downsizing and a deterioration of customer relations. PeopleSoft had in its bylaws a poison pill to protect itself against hostile takeovers. The poison pill was a bylaw that stated that the company had the ability to release more shares in order to dilute the shares of the company taking over once that company controlled more than 20% of the shares of PeopleSoft. The only way to eliminate the poison pill was if the board of directors approved its elimination. Another factor that negatively impacted Oracle was the legal actions that J.D Edwards took against Oracle in the form of a lawsuit. In the end Oracle was able to take over...
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper

Android vs. iPhone OS

...Android vs. iPhone OS Comparing and contrasting Android and iPhone OS Google’s Android and Apple’s iPhone have somecommon features. One such major similarity is the operating system, as both work on Linux based operating systems. These companies have developed and modified this OS to suit their smart phone applications. However, while comparing the two mobile phones, many differences do crop up. These are discussed in the following paragraphs. Operating systems While iPhone has a completely closed operating system, Google has an open system for its Android mobile phone. As both systems have their own strengths and...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay


...victim among other reasons are on the top of the list in this category. However, Google engineers have refuted these claims terming it as an exaggeration on the part of the security companies with the aim of gaining from the result. In summation, the android system has both the negative and positive attribute in the security sector. However, the positive clearly outweigh the negative aspect. It goes without noticing that android applications are developed based of the java programming language. On that note, the language is hugely influenced by the software development kit (SDK) is an essential part in the creation of the applications for this system(Toly, 23)....
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Principles Of Auditing - Apple vs. Samsung Lawsuit

...Principles of Auditing - Apple vs. Samsung Lawsuit INTRODUCTION In the present day context, both Apple and Samsung are considered as the leading business organizations particularly in mobile communication and other innovative electronic gadgets sphere. However, the organizations are facing significant problem due to issues regarding product design patents and copyrights. In this context, Apple charged Samsung with the infringement of its patent right and design structure owing to which Samsung is required to pay fines as well as damages for the same (Lohr, “Apple-Samsung Case Shows Smartphone as Legal Magnet”). THESIS STATEMENT The essay critically explores the lawsuit along with...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Principles Of Auditing - Apple vs. Samsung Lawsuit

...Principles of Auditing - Apple vs. Samsung Lawsuit INTRODUCTION Apple Inc and Samsung Group are regarded as the major leading companies throughout the globe dealing with varied sorts of consumer electronics related products. From the very beginning, these two companies were viewed to compete with the mission of becoming the foremost leader in the respective industry. However, during this action course, certain tensions rose between the aforesaid two companies that eventually resulted in filing lawsuit in opposition to one another. Identifiably, in the lawsuit, Apple indicted Samsung based on the ground that it has stolen certain software and infringed patent as well as...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Oracle vs. Google Lawsuit (Android and Java) for FREE!

Contact Us