Nobody downloaded yet

Criminal Procedure in Regards to Search and Seizure - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Response Paper Number One: Criminal Procedure in Regards to Search and Seizure [YOUR NAME HERE] [YOUR UNIVERSITY HERE] Abstract The Fourth Amendment, as well as state constitutions, provides protections against citizens from warrantless search and seizures by those in law enforcement…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.6% of users find it useful
Criminal Procedure in Regards to Search and Seizure
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Criminal Procedure in Regards to Search and Seizure"

Download file to see previous pages Through the study of the differences between two cases that set precedent for the decision of State v. Randolph (2002) in Tennessee, including California v. Hodari D. (1991) and United States v. Mendenhall (1980), these circumstances will be addressed. Also discussed within this paper will be how these decisions impact both law enforcement officers in trying to carry out the duties of their jobs, and how those same decisions can affect those with mental health conditions when faced with search and seizure circumstances. Response Paper Number One: Criminal Procedure in Regards to Search and Seizure Differences in the Decisions Between California v. Hodari D (1991) and United States v. Menedenhall (1980) In the case of State v. Randolph (2002), as reviewed in the Memphis Law Review by Brent A. Heilig, the main issue to be dealt with is, in broad terms, the search and seizure of citizens. Though this practice, according to Mr. Heilig, is supported by Article I, Section 7 of the Tennessee State Constitution, as well as the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, it is frequently questioned and cited throughout the case. For purposes of precedent, as with most legal cases, two previously decided cases were given for comparison, United States v. Mendenhall (1980) and California v. Hodari D. (1991). ...
Mendenhall (1980), the Supreme Court concluded that if a person believed they were free to leave at any time, they were not seized. This is fairly straightforward. If a person believes that they are not free to leave an area before, during, or after being detained by law enforcement, they have been seized. If they believe that they are free to leave, they are not. However, in the case of California v. Hodari D. (1991), the Supreme Court ruled that a person was not considered “seized” unless some form of physical restraint was directed at an individual by an officer, or the individual has yielded to some form of authority shown, thus introducing a subjective element. Even the wording of the California v. Hodari D. (1991) decision is subjective; while a “form of physical restraint” can be interpreted fairly easily, as law enforcement officers have such means at their disposal, the term “show of authority” cannot. It is not defined, exactly, what a show of authority is, whether it is calling for a suspect to halt, activating flashing lights on a patrol car, or simply showing some form of identification as a law enforcement officer. Regardless, the main point is that if they do not submit, they are not considered seized. The second main difference highlighted between the two decisions is that instead of moving in a broader direction as far as seizure parameters were concerned, California v. Hodari D. (1991) moves in the other direction completely. As per United States v. Mendenhall (1980), all that is required to define a seizure is the belief by a person that they are not free to go. This defines a broach scope of seizure, and sets a precedent for future cases that can easily be applied. By its very nature, the phrase “not free to leave” can ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Criminal Procedure in Regards to Search and Seizure Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Criminal Procedure in Regards to Search and Seizure Essay)
“Criminal Procedure in Regards to Search and Seizure Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Criminal Procedure in Regards to Search and Seizure

Search and Seizure

...?Search and Seizure: ’Search and Seizure’ are couple of legal terms (usually used together) in civil and common law systems, where law-enforcement authorities or their representatives, search a person’s property and confiscate valuable evidence to a purported crime. The persons upon whom search and seizure are committed are selected on grounds of reasonable suspicion. In most cases, the search operation does not lead to seizure of goods/property belonging to the suspected person. At the time of the writing of the Constitution, the Founding Fathers reasoned that “search and seizure is a necessary exercise in the ongoing pursuit of criminals. Searches and seizures are used to produce evidence for the prosecution of alleged criminals... the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay


...?SEARCH AND SEIZURE- CRIMINAL LAW Introduction The laws of every nation continue to see amendments with the hope of making the laws as infallible as possible. On the whole, laws undergo the transitions they go through because of the ultimate aim of ensuring that laws of the nation become the most comprehensive tools for ensuring fairness, justice and equality for all citizens of the nation. The United States legal system is no different from other legal systems of the world as it has also gone through a number of reforms and amendments. The Investor Words (2011) explains that an amendment is “a change or addition to a legal document which, when properly signed, has the same legal power as...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Criminal Procedure as Regards Arrest, Interrogation, and Identification Procedures

...? Response Paper Number Two: Criminal Procedure as Regards Arrest, Interrogation, and Identification Procedures HERE] HERE] Abstract The decision of the United States Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) meant that police officers were henceforth required to read all arrested persons a “Miranda warning”, in which it was agreed by all parties that certain rights were guaranteed to the accused under the United States Constitution. Taken in a singular context, the Miranda warning is an easy to understand and straightforward statement. However, when dealing with persons of diminished mental capacity, these statements can be drastically reinterpreted to...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Criminal procedure

...? Criminal procedure Crime control is an integral move to maintain order within the society. This is important especially that society nowadays is becoming sophisticated in almost every aspect (social, economic, politics etc). Thus, in this paper the proponent tries to analyze which among the due process and crime control model gives the people significant advantages and benefits in addressing their concerns. Regarding this, the proponent tries to compare and contrast the role of due process and crime control models on shaping criminal procedure policy. Thus, the analysis includes a review and assessment of the Amendments of the United States Constitution...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Search and Seizure 4th Ammendment

...and private citizens. While the Bill of Rights, initially only restricted the federal administration’s power, a ruling by the Supreme Court in Wolf vs. Colorado ruled that Amendment IV (Scheb, 2011) also bound state governments. As the jurisdiction, by the federal government over criminal activities, grew the Supreme Court handled more cases regarding Amendment IV. It ruled that, while some searches and seizures are in violation of the requirement of reasonableness even when there was support for the warrant by probable cause and scope limitation, seizures without warrants were approvable if belief of criminal offences, being committed,...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Search and Seizure

...? Search and Seizure Introduction Search and seizure law has been one of the hallmarks of the United States’ criminal justice system. This paper defines search, seizure, arrest, and reasonableness as regards the criminal justice system. It also looks into the concept of ‘Stop and Frisk,’ automobile search rules, border and regulatory searches; and examines the way in which searches, seizures, arrest, and reasonableness affect privacy. According to the Supreme Court, searches refer to law enforcement...
3 Pages(750 words)Admission/Application Essay

Search and Seizure

...for issuance of the search warrant under Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723, and Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 89 S.Ct. 584, 21 L.Ed.2d 637, since they failed to satisfy the "two pronged test" of (1) revealing the informants "basis of knowledge" and (2) providing sufficient facts to establish either the informants "veracity" or the "reliability" of the informants report. Held: 1. The question—which this Court requested the parties to address—whether the rule requiring the exclusion at a criminal trial of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment should be modified so as, for example, not to require exclusion of evidence obtained in the reasonable belief...
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper

Position paper base on a recent issue related to the constitution and the executive branch

...The Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. constitution spells out the rights of individuals under criminal investigation. In this Amendment, there are boundaries set on what power the police have regarding performing searches on individuals and property, make arrests and confiscate objects such as weapons, drugs and evidence. These boundaries are the basic principles of search and seizure law in criminal investigation matters. This is how the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Criminal Procedure

.... A suspect should be suppressed since the constitution provides that police can question witnesses at crime scenes without reading them their Miranda rights, and should a witness implicate themselves in the crime during that questioning, their statements could be used against them later in court. Nonetheless, a suspect should not be suppressed since the same constitution protects suspects from self incrimination. The adjudication process of the criminal law differs due to jurisdiction. Generally though, it assumes the same format. The burden of proof is always on the prosecution in most countries with a democratic rule of law. The world ought to hold weight in the presumption of innocence for the...
2 Pages(500 words)Article

Criminal Procedure

...Criminal Procedure Introduction The book ‘A Matter of Interpretation’ by Antonin Scalia elaborates about the methodology used for interpreting and implementing the constitution legal principles upon the cases addressed in the US Supreme court1. The interpretation of written laws on the basis of which the legislators have framed is referred to as ‘textualism’. In this regard, the author is identified to be adherence to textaulism2;3. Contextually, the essay majorly focuses towards understanding the patterns of textualisation as described by ’Antonin Scalia’. Discussion In accordance with Justice Antonin Scalia, each and every constitutional law should be interpreted depending on the actual context and should not be subjected... of the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Criminal Procedure in Regards to Search and Seizure for FREE!

Contact Us