The Fourth Amendment of the federal laws - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The Fourth Amendment of the federal laws governs criminal procedure that starts from seeking of warrants of searches, seizures, and arrest up to the judicial processes. This paper seeks to discuss legal issues in criminal procedure through exploring a case study. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.5% of users find it useful
The Fourth Amendment of the federal laws
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The Fourth Amendment of the federal laws"

MID TERM ESSAY QUESTIONS 6RD February Midterm essay questions Introduction The Fourth Amendment of the federal laws governs criminal procedure that starts from seeking of warrants of searches, seizures, and arrest up to the judicial processes. This paper seeks to discuss legal issues in criminal procedure through exploring a case study. Question 1: Quality of evidence and arrest warrant Search or arrest warrants are given to law enforcement officers by a court. Sufficient evidence, that meets a threshold for probable cause, must however be given by the police. The first proof for sufficiency of evidence, according to the case of Maryland v Pringle, is the reliability of the source of information with respect to truthfulness. The authorities must convince the courts that the informant is reliable. Another necessity for issuance of a warrant is the informant’s rationale that has led to conclusion that the suspect is about to commit a crime or is in the process of committing a crime. In the case, Suzan informs the police in California that two suspects are about to transport heroin. The police then inform their counterparts in Chicago. The basis for a warrant by the Chicago police therefore meets the essentials for a warrant. The source, being a police force is trusted for truth and reliability and therefore forms a basis for issuance of a warrant (Carmen, 2009). Question 2: Elements of a search The fourth amendment defines a search as a substantive breach of personal right of privacy. Further, application of technology to advance police activities with respect to search have been considered as searches. This was held in the case of Kyllo v United States. Use of police dog for detection is also considered as a search unless the dog sniffs from a far distance. The use of a police dog can therefore be considered as a technological act to constitute a search (Carmen, 2009; Meeker, 2004). Question 3 State’s argument for a warrantless search The general rule is that searches are supposed to be made after a warrant has been issued by a court. There are, however, exemptions to this rule and the police can legally search a personal vehicle without a warrant. Such exemptions include “searches with consent, special need beyond law, exigent circumstances, stop and frisk and motor vehicle” searches (Carmen, 2009, 204). All these exemptions allow the police to make a legal search on Tom’s vehicle. There was for example an initial consent, by the suspects, for the search. Further, the actual detection of a suspicious material in the car trunk was an instant event. The police can also argue that it was a stop and frisk exercise since the car driver behaved suspiciously in a deserted area. The law also allows the police to make searches on vehicles on transit. Based on these arguments, the court is likely to uphold the search as legal (Carmen, 2009). Question 4: Arguments over moves to suppress evidence of methamphetamine found during police inventory Argument by the state The police are legally entitled to undertake searches once a suspect has been put under arrest. Under this principle, the law provides that a suspect’s immediate environment can be searched to prevent the suspect from obtaining and possibly interfering with evidence. Search for a substance in a suspect’s cloths is therefore a legal move (Carmen, 2009). Tom’s argument At the same time, searches after arrest should be done upon consent of the suspect. Tom can argue that the search that revealed Methamphetamine was not done with his consent (Carmen, 2009). The court’s likely decision Though the search might have not been done on tom’s consent, he was already under arrest and the case can be considered to be exigent. Based on Welch’s case, the court is likely to uphold the search as legal under exigent exemption of warrantless search (Carmen, 2009, 220). Question 5: Arguments in a motion to suppress evidence The law has general provisions for both arrests on warrants and warrantless arrests. In case of an arrest on warrant, the warrant must be specific on the objectives. Warrantless arrests are on the other hand limited by privacy of the suspect. As a result, no warrantless arrest can be made within a person’s residence. These two general principles forms the basis upon which Sam can suppress the evidence put against him. Privacy laws protect the location of the alleged crime while the warrant was not for the arrest made and the subsequent evidence (Carmen, 2009). There is also a general provision that a police officer is legally permitted to make arrest on crimes committed in his presence. Based on this principle, the court is most likes to approve the arrest together with the evidence presented against Sam (Meeker, 2004). Extra credit questions: Search under traffic violation A police officer is not allowed to search or frisk a vehicle driver in a normal traffic patrol, unless there is reasonable ground to suspect a threat. Pat can therefore not search Bob under traffic violation (Carmen, 2009). Unreasonable seizure A police officer on patrol can order a vehicle driver to get out of the car if the officer is suspicious of any danger. The officer’s rights are extended to passenger seats in the subject vehicle. Ordering Bob and Tom does not therefore constitute an unreasonable seizure (Carmen, 2009). References Carmen, R. (2009). Criminal Procedure: Law and Practice. Belmont, CA Cengage Learning Meeker, J. (2004). State bar of texas, 30th annual criminal law course. Retrieved from: Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“The Fourth Amendment of the federal laws Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(The Fourth Amendment of the Federal Laws Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“The Fourth Amendment of the Federal Laws Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Fourth Amendment of the federal laws

Fourth amendment: Searches and seizures

...enforcement officers ample room to engage in any reasonable law enforcement activity.  The Fourth Amendment requires not only that warrants be supported by probable cause, but it also requires that a warrant "particularly" describe the person or place to be searched or seized. Warrants must provide enough detail so that an officer with the warrant can determine with reasonable effort the persons and places identified in the warrant. This provision also evolved to reflect the significance of the liberty and rights of persons as enshrined in the Bill of Rights. Hence, it primarily and purposefully intends to be interpreted that no warrant shall be issued by the court without probable and...
20 Pages(5000 words)Research Paper

Fourth Amendment the police” (Levy 1995, p.164) In the case of Wolf v. Colorado, the Supreme Court recognized that “fourth amendment rights are basic to a free society and are therefore, implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.” (Article 1, § 7 of the Tennessee Constitution) It is thus evident that the fourth amendment is also enforceable against the states through the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment that also secures the rights of an individual to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. The are various interpretations of the clauses contained in the fourth amendment, but’ reasonableness’ tends to be the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

The fourth amendment and NYPD Surveillance

...of the constitutional bill of rights guarding against unreasonable seizures and searches, while requiring warrants to be sanctioned by courts of law, and being held up by showing probable cause. In 1968, the Supreme court, in its decision on the Terry vs. Ohio case, ruled that the detention of a man’s person and his subsequent search in the absence of a warrant, was not a violation of his fourth amendment rights, if the officer was acting on the reasonable belief grounded on suspicions that were objective. For example, that the man was holding a weapon, or was dangerous. This procedure, however, was used for racial profiling over the years, first with brown and black people and more...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Federal Laws & Segregation

... Federal Laws & Segregation Introduction The law is a set standards that provide comprehensive guidelines and policiesthat guide execution of activities in diverse settings. They are set with the main objective of streamlining operations; ensure fairness in service delivery and protection of individual rights. Various laws have been initiated in the US to advance service delivery and to enhance equality. The laws include health law, federal laws, segregation including and land regulation act. In particular, this paper focuses on federal law and segregation policies that were initiated to streamline land and housing sectors with an aim of ensuring the provision of decent housing units to individuals with limited discrimination... . The...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

An Analysis of the Fourth Amendment

...on or their general conduct during the searches. The conduct and practice of the authorities was consistent with the view that the authorities had unlimited powers over all their subjects and could search their private residences at their own whims. Legal scholars and historians connect the origin of the fourth amendment to the old English law, which was equally challenged on the grounds of the excessive powers wielded by the King in searching or arresting persons suspected of certain violations. The fourth amendment was viewed as a culmination of critics of the search system who insisted that the authorities and the executive should be guided by very...
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper

Second Amendment and Gun Laws

...? Second Amendment and Gun Laws Introduction The issue of civilian gun ownership has caused a very heated debate and must be looked at in a very critical manner. Needless to say, there are those who believe that civilians should not be allowed to legally own a gun. On the other hand, there are those who believe that in accordance to the second amendment of the American constitution individuals should be allowed to own a gun so that they can protect the their lives if it comes to that (Gerber, 2011). To be able to critically look at the issue, the best way to look at arguments is from both sides. Nevertheless, it is apparent that it is better to have a gun and not need it than to need a...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Fourth amendment

...the colonial America that involved the issuance of searches without a cause or a warrant of arrest. The Amendment is meant to safeguard the people of America from privacy violations in the form of seizures and searches of their cars, homes and other properties. The Amendment also covers issues concerning the unlawful arrest of people. The Fourth Amendment The amendment is concerned about privacy; privacy is what the society is willing to embrace as reasonable as it is by the court’s interpretation. Determination of what is reasonable is dependent on the balance between the individual’s rights and the public interest left alone from the illogical...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

A Danger to Fourth Amendment Rights

...(Deborah, 1997). Terry v Ohio (1962), addressed a number of reasonsin seizure and search activities. The court decided that it was legal for police to frisk, question and stop any person whom the law enforcement officers believed that he was acting suspiciously. This is referred to a lower standard than what the fourth amendment refers to a probable cause. Deborah (1997) claims that such frisking and question is against the Fourth Amendment rights while majority think that allowing seizures and searches was a serious blow against the fourth amendment, because it is less than a probable cause. Many seizures and searches...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

The Fourth Amendment, Search and Seizure

...(Schulhofer, 2012). The suppression of evidence was on the basis that the officers' entry into the house was warrantless hence violating the Fourth Amendment. Utah State Supreme Court affirmed this decision suspending any claim on the emergency aid doctrine and exigency of the situation. The court cited the absence of an objective reasonable belief that there was a missing, semiconscious or unconscious person in the premises. It was this notion that the court used to suspend any claim on the emergency aid doctrine. The emergency doctrine excuses individuals from acting reasonably in lieu of an urgent need to offer aid in an emergency situation. The court suspended the doctrine also because the officers...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment Rights

...) right to be represented by an attorney and (2) right to be notified that his statements will be used in a court of law (self-incrimination). Therefore, from the case police infringed on Miranda’s rights by interrogating him in absence of his attorney, which led to him making incriminatory statements that were used against him in the court resulting to him being sentenced to 20-30 years imprisonment. The Fourth Amendment The purpose of this amendment was to deny the Federal government the authority making general seizures and searches on people’s property without reasonable course. However, the amendment provides that in good course the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic The Fourth Amendment of the federal laws for FREE!

Contact Us