Nobody downloaded yet

Proprietary Rights and Corporate Torts - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Proprietary Rights and Corporate Torts: Applications of Intentional Torts to Corporate Trespass Concerning Documents and Intellectual Property Rights Introduction Intentional torts, as opposed to negligent torts, imply an element of intent to bring about a certain consequence, whether harm is also intended or not…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93% of users find it useful
Proprietary Rights and Corporate Torts
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Proprietary Rights and Corporate Torts"

Download file to see previous pages This paper considers some of these cases that applied intentional tort against defendants who have gained wrongful access to company files and properties, and discusses the impact of their use on corporate law. Methodology This research paper was conducted initially by gathering suitable materials such as books and cases that are related to the subject. The method primarily used is data mining on the subject of intentional torts, including classifications thereof, and corporate cases that involve intentional torts. This entailed electronic searches of relevant materials and a subsequent search for primary sources such as cases from various jurisdictions and secondary sources such as books. The next stage is to actually get a copy of the sources thus gathered either electronically or on tape. Finally, the data gathered were summarized and presented. Intentional Tort and its Application in Corporate Trespass Cases A look at case law across the country reveals that a number had applied intentional torts in corporate trespass cases. This is true in the states of New York, Ohio, Virginia, California and Indiana, among others. In CompuServe Incorporated v Cyber Promotions, Inc and Sanford Wallace, 1 a preliminary injunction was granted to the plaintiff in an action for trespass to chattels. ...
Similar cases to the foregoing are AOL v LCGM , 2 AOL v IMS, 3 AOL v NHCD 4 where the defendants were charged with trespass to chattels, among others, under Virginia common law for sending unsolicited email advertisements to AOL subscribers, and Hotmail Corporation v Vans Money Pie Inc, 5 where defendant deceitfully used Hotmail accounts as addressees. In all those cases, trespass occurred with intermeddling of personal property without authorization or when the use amounts to the impairment of its value. Other similar cases are EarthLink, Inc. v Carmack 6 decided in Georgia, and Tyco International (US) Inc. v Doe, 7 decided in New York. Three cases, viz., eBay v. Bidder’s Edge, 8 v Verio, 9 and Oyster Software Inc. v. Forms Processing Inc., et al, 10 used crawlers/search robots to search plaintiffs’ websites. In eBay, auction listings were obtained from the plaintiff’s site, in, domain name registrants and in Oyster, meta tags. The courts ruled that the acts constituted trespass to chattel because they interfered with possessory right without authorization and damage ensued. The Sotelo v DirectRevenue, LLC 11 case, on the other hand, involves the use of spyware and the defendant was an internet-based company that provided internet games for download bundled with spyware, which allowed pop-ups while users use the internet. The trespass to chattel was justified due to lack of authority and electronic contact that caused damage to the computer. In Thrifty-Tel, Inc., v Bezenek 12 the defendants were the parents of minors who had tapped into a telephone system by cracking its authorization and access codes using computer technology. Initially tried for conversion, the cause of action was ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Proprietary Rights and Corporate Torts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Proprietary Rights and Corporate Torts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. Retrieved from
(Proprietary Rights and Corporate Torts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Proprietary Rights and Corporate Torts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words.
“Proprietary Rights and Corporate Torts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Proprietary Rights and Corporate Torts

Torts Law Problem

... Task Torts Law Problem In the scenario, Cathy may seek a legal redress against MoreeRE under the tort of negligence for misrepresentation or negligent advice. The cause arises as against MoreeRE under the doctrine of vicarious liability that provides that, an agent’s action is binding upon the principle if the employee was discharging his/her duties in the course of employment. In Lloyd vs. Grace Smith & Co, 1 the court held that a principle is variously liable for the fraud of an agent acting for a corporation. By employing this rule, John was an employee of MoreeRE and was making representations for the company in his dealings with Cathy. His actions could therefore be interpreted as being binding upon MoreeRE Company, and thus... ...
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study

The Law of Restitution rem. The claimants interest to the property ranks above the other creditors of the defendant and hence the claimant is likely to recover the property if the defendant becomes insolvent ( Garry, 2008). Restitution is considered to be mauti-causal. The first category of restitution is the restitution for unjust enrichment. This involves reversing of gains by a defendant obtained in an unjust way. The second category on restitution is known as restitution for wrong doing. For example, when a defendant commits a tort against the claimant, the remedial assessment is done in reference to the defendant’s gain and not necessarily in reference to the claimant’s loss. The claimant has the proprietary...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Income Gap in the U.S. Workers rights vs. Corporate Rights Winkler’s notes on money creation (5), “DOLLARS ARE CREATED PRIVATELY AS LOANS BY BANKERS WHO ARE PART OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE”. Question 2: Workers’ rights vs. Corporate Rights Employees are some of the best resources that an organization could be endowed with because they determine the performance of the firm to a large extent as compared to any other inputs. The rights of employees are many and they are embedded in company policies. For effective performance, employees must be given their rights, which leave them motivated. McIntyre argues that there are many rights of employees (102). To begin with, employees are entitled to the...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Law of Torts

...1 Law of Torts I would advise Mr. Andy that his accident occurred in the type of area commonly known for producing similar types of vehicle mishaps, and it will not be necessary for him to prove any type of vicarious liability. It is the duty of the owner to make the property safe. . in the case of McWilliams V. Sir William Arroll 1962, the 'but for' test is applicable on the premise that he (Mr. Andy) would not have sustained the injury but for the breach of the (property owner) defendant. Moreover as in Anns V Merton (1977), Lord Wilberforce proposed a two-staged testonce neighborhood was established, there is a prima facie duty of care, which can only be rebutted on policy ground. (Boone) I would...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Proprietary and Contract Security

...Proprietary vs. Contract Security PROPRIETARY VS CONTRACT SECURITY Titus Rock Manickam Order No. 266379 12 January 2009 PROPRIETARY VS CONTRACT SECURITY Introduction In the proprietary versus contract security, there appears to be some bias against the contract system. Companies do not normally install security that is available in the open market. There is preference for known brands like Norton and Symantec. "I think there is some sort of ingrained bias [against open source security technology] because there is still this myth that open source isn't as robust," said Alex Fletcher, lead technology analyst at Entiva Group Inc., a Silver Spring,...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay


...Company. (Property law summary). In another case law, Clore V Theatrical Properties Ltd. (1936), the licensor A, was denied permission to sell drinks in the theatre, formerly run by D. The new owner C, refused to validate the licence given by D to A. Held, the court upheld C’s contention, and the only remedy for A was to seek redressal from D, who had assigned the licence to A. (Enforcement against third parties). 3. The rights against trespassers could be enforced: It is seen in the decided case law -Manchester Airport V Dutton (2000). It is a generally accepted principle on law that only those people who have some ‘proprietary interest in the land’ could bring action against trespassers of the said...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Torts Law

...Torts law Introduction Liability for negligence is founded on the principles of duty of care, breach of that duty and the resultant damage and loss. The defendant must have been implicated in all these circumstances to become liable. In the instant case, the service provider Family Friendly Fishing had a duty of care to their patrons Mickey and family in that the fishing vessel and accessories should have been kept free from defects especially as the ones involved in dangerous sports. Though the captain of the vessel Neil already warned the service provider of the defective condition of the fishing equipment, the service provider brushed it aside in a casual manner saying no untoward incident had happened in the past 25...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Minority Shareholders Proprietary Rights

...Minority Shareholder’s Proprietary rights. The rights of the minority shareholders have always been sought for setting right the wrongs that might get done to them. The Gambotto case1 in Australia was the one that set the ball rolling when it came to minority shareholder rights. It has been upheld in a number of cases that any amendment to the articles of a company should stand the Allen Vs Gold Reefs (1900)2 test. According to this test, there were two limbs that need to be satisfied. One, the amendment must be for proper use and second, the amendment should not be oppressive on the minority shareholders of the company. As in the case of Gambotto in...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Employee innovations and proprietary rights

...EMPLOYEE INNOVATIONS AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT In return for my new or continued employment by _____________________ Company”) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which I Hereby acknowledge, I acknowledge and agree that: 1. Best Efforts. During my employment with Company, I will devote my best efforts to the interests of Company. During my employment with Company, I reserve the right to be a consultant for Company X. During my employment with Company, I am not prohibited from referring any client or potential client of Company to competitors of Company. 2. Prior Work. All previous work done by me for Company relating in any way...
11 Pages(2750 words)Assignment


... number: Memorandum Detailing Research On Two Tort Scenarios Part Jennifer Oaks vs. Thomas Wilkes) In this case, the plaintiff is Jennifer Oaks and the defendants are Thomas Wilkes and Rusty Converse. Thomas Wilkes is sued for assault and battery and is to be held liable for an intentional tort, where he did an intentional act that caused harm to Jennifer Oaks. Thomas Wilkes intentionally called Jennifer Oaks derogatory names such as bitch, slut, fat-ass, and a whore, in addition to the name-calling and unpleasant noises he made towards her and other girls. The assault and battery against Jennifer Oaks include of the fact that Thomas Wilkes physically confronted Jennifer while she was among other students in the school’s hallway... the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Proprietary Rights and Corporate Torts for FREE!

Contact Us