Free

Current Trend in Criminal Law and Procedure - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
A Current Trend in Criminal Law and Procedure The criminal law or the penal law, which deals with the crimes that prohibits by the state in its territory since it is harmful for the safety, security and well-being of its citizens. Breach of law that relates to crimes attracts punitive action by the court in terms of fine or imprisonment or both as the case may be…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.6% of users find it useful
Current Trend in Criminal Law and Procedure
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Current Trend in Criminal Law and Procedure"

A Current Trend in Criminal Law and Procedure The criminal law or the penal law, which deals with the crimes that prohibits by the in its territory since it is harmful for the safety, security and well-being of its citizens. Breach of law that relates to crimes attracts punitive action by the court in terms of fine or imprisonment or both as the case may be. Criminal law and the civil law are two different laws according to its foundation to deal with the cases separately (Michael, 2009). If someone violates the criminal law, the criminal procedure takes it course against the violator to implement its writ. In many democracies of the world wherein the criminal cases burden of proof lies on the shoulder of prosecution. In other words, it is the responsibility of prosecution to prove the guilt of a guilty person in the competent court of law. Contrary, the defense counsel proves that the alleged person is innocent and falsely implicated in the case by the investigation (Michael, 2009). In criminal cases defendant has the right to engage legal counsel to plead his / her case at his / her own expense. In case of his / her inability to engage legal counsel, state has the responsibility to provide him the services of criminal lawyer to defend the allegations leveled against him by the investigation (Michael, 2009). In the United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation annually published crime report that contains committed crimes reported to the police by the victims. As per the published report, the crime rate in America in the years 2009 and 1964 was the same. However, the homicide rate was at its lowest ebb. The financially weak, dejected persons and the disadvantaged areas were the breeding grounds for committing crimes (Michael, 2009). The state of Dallas is the best example of having one of the highest crime rates in America. The reported crimes in many other cities of America inclusive of Dallas relates to property crimes and violent crimes. Agreement between two or more persons to accomplish a task through illegal means or illegal action has been defined in the US law as conspiracy. If someone plans to rob a bank to raise funds for the welfare of the people is considered criminal conspiracy. Secrecy maintained for execution of an illegal plan by the stakeholders comes under the purview of conspiracy. The Han Twins Murder Conspiracy case is a fit case for the mentioned definition where one of the twin sisters Jenna Han attempted to hire youths to get killed her sister in the year 1996 in California of United States. The defense counsel argued that Jenna had no intention to kill Sunny. She just wanted to intimidate her. Jenna was found guilty. She received capital punishment of 26 years in prison. Three days after the verdict, Jenna committed suicide in her cell (Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of California, 2000). Jose Padilla, a US citizen known as Abdullah al-Muhajir convicted of aiding terrorists is another example of conspiracy crime. He was arrested in Chicago on May 8, 2002 on the charges of conspiring of plotting a radiological bombing attack. Until June 9, 2002, he was incarcerated since the former president of America branded him as number one enemy of United States of America. Thus, in view the Americans he is not entitled to try in civilian courts. He was behind the bar for three and half years. As a result of pressure from civil societies, his case was transferred to a civilian court for trial. He was transferred to a Miami jail to face criminal conspiracy charges. The federal jury found him culpable of conspiring to take life of people and to fund and support foreign terrorists. The Padilla was awarded more than17 years in prison by the District Court (Anderson, 2007). The Supreme Court heard the case of Rumsfeld v Padilla in April 2004. Later on the apex court dismissed the petition on technical grounds because a) improperly filed the case in federal court of New York instead of Carolina, where Padilla was actually being detained b) the petition naming the Secretary of Defense as the respondent instead of the Commanding Officer of the naval brigade who was Padilla's actual custodian for habeas corpus purposes (Sontag, 2007). The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is of the view that the President has no authority to order military detention of an American citizen captured on American land (Anderson, 2007). In the case of Rumsfeld v Padilla, 542 U.S. 426 (2004), Padilla sought relief of the Supreme Court in a habeas corpus petition filed against Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld by declaring his detention as unlawful (Sontag, 2007). The Supreme Court set aside the decision of Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and allows Padilla to re file the petition (Anderson, 2007). References Anderson, Curt. (2007). "Judge: Lawyer Leaked Padilla Transcripts". Associated Press. Retrieved on September 11, 2011 from http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070124/D8MRU7PO0.html Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of California. (2000). The Court Of Appeal of the State of California Fourth Appellate District Division Three. Retrieved on September 11, 2011 from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/g023433.pdf Michael R. Rand. (2009). National Crime Victimization Survey: Criminal Victimization, 2008. Table 5. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Retrieved on September 11, 2011 from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv08.pdf Sontag, Deborah. (2007). "In Padilla Wiretaps, Murky View of ‘Jihad’ Case". New York Times.  Retrieved on September 11, 2011 from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/04/washington/04padilla.html?ex=1325566800&en=00f2006f4976bc08&ei=5088 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Current Trend in Criminal Law and Procedure Essay”, n.d.)
Current Trend in Criminal Law and Procedure Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1433252-current-trend-in-criminal-law-and-procedure
(Current Trend in Criminal Law and Procedure Essay)
Current Trend in Criminal Law and Procedure Essay. https://studentshare.org/law/1433252-current-trend-in-criminal-law-and-procedure.
“Current Trend in Criminal Law and Procedure Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1433252-current-trend-in-criminal-law-and-procedure.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Current Trend in Criminal Law and Procedure

Criminal procedure

...? Criminal procedure Crime control is an integral move to maintain order within the society. This is important especially that society nowadays is becoming sophisticated in almost every aspect (social, economic, politics etc). Thus, in this paper the proponent tries to analyze which among the due process and crime control model gives the people significant advantages and benefits in addressing their concerns. Regarding this, the proponent tries to compare and contrast the role of due process and crime control models on shaping criminal procedure policy. Thus, the analysis includes a review and assessment of the Amendments of the United States Constitution and the Bill of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Criminal Procedure Policy Paper

... according to the levels of their crimes (Pritchett, 1977). The fifth amendment of the American constitution says that no person should not be forced confess to any crime unless there is the presence of the grand jury. This amendment ensures that the defendants are not harassed by prosecutors and investigators (Pritchett, 1977). References Carmen, R. V. (2009). Criminal Procedure: Law and Practice. Stamford, Connecticut: Cengage Learning. Pritchett, C. H. (1977). The American Constitution, Volume 1. New York City: McGraw-Hill. Samaha, J. (2011). Criminal Procedure. Stamford, Connecticut: Cengage Learning.... ? Criminal Procedure Policy Task: Criminal procedure policy plays a...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Criminal Procedure Variation

...months of the year 2005 alone (http://blogs.amnestyusa.org/death-penalty/archive/2005/09/). This death penalty law is currently still active in Alabama, as can be seen by recent news and events. This controversial law is different than in the states which declare capital punishment illegal, and do not partake in it. For instance, a crime that would give a person the death penalty in Alabama would not get the death in Alaska, where the death penalty is illegal and not part of the criminal justice system there. Alaska is just one of several states that find the death penalty illegal in their criminal proceedings. These states would treat such crimes very...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Criminal Law and Procedure

...1) Assume a law enforcement officer has cause to arrest a defendant for armed assault, and he also has probable cause to believe that person is hiding in a third person's garage, which is attached to the house. What warrants if any does the officer need to enter the garage to arrest the defendant What if the officer is in hot pursuit of the defendant Is known to be injured and unarmed Provide evidence to support your answer. The officer does not need a warrant to enter the garage to arrest the defendant. If the Officer has probable cause to believe the defendant to be armed and dangerous, these would be considered an exigent circumstance1 which merits a warrant less search of the garage to apprehend an armed and dangerous suspect... . If the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Criminal Procedure (Assignment 1)

...Harris Kamran Law Case Studies 24 October Due process of law According to the U.S. constitution, the term due process of law can be defined as the nature of the law and the reason for its implementation (Mount, 2010). That is to say, the due process has two parts: the procedural, and the substantive part (Mount, 2010). In the procedural part, the nature of the law is observed, and whether it is fair and impartial (Mount, 2010). The substantive part deals with the actual implementation of the law, and it can modify any mistakes in the ...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Criminal Procedure

.... A suspect should be suppressed since the constitution provides that police can question witnesses at crime scenes without reading them their Miranda rights, and should a witness implicate themselves in the crime during that questioning, their statements could be used against them later in court. Nonetheless, a suspect should not be suppressed since the same constitution protects suspects from self incrimination. The adjudication process of the criminal law differs due to jurisdiction. Generally though, it assumes the same format. The burden of proof is always on the prosecution in most countries with a democratic rule of law. The world ought to hold weight in the presumption of...
2 Pages(500 words)Article

Felony Criminal Charge Procedure

...Felony Criminal Charge Procedure Introduction Criminal justice procedures are crucial in any modest society, as they serve to instil sanity and lawful coexistence among people (Champion, 1988). However, because of the varying nature of the legislation available in different societies the course that criminal justice procedures take tend varying from state to state depending on the legislation and rules governing them. This paper will dwell on elaborating the criminal justice procedure that is followed for felony charge offenders (Scheb & Scheb, 2011). Despite the procedure varying from state to state, there are acceptable steps that are involved which all the states and federal government concur. This essay will be focussed... is...
8 Pages(2000 words)Term Paper

Criminal Procedure

...Criminal Procedure Introduction The book ‘A Matter of Interpretation’ by Antonin Scalia elaborates about the methodology used for interpreting and implementing the constitution legal principles upon the cases addressed in the US Supreme court1. The interpretation of written laws on the basis of which the legislators have framed is referred to as ‘textualism’. In this regard, the author is identified to be adherence to textaulism2;3. Contextually, the essay majorly focuses towards understanding the patterns of textualisation as described by ’Antonin Scalia’. Discussion In accordance with Justice Antonin Scalia, each and every constitutional law should be interpreted depending on the actual context and should not be subjected... with the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Criminal procedure 1

...1. The problem with the Bill of Rights is that it was passed by and ratified by the executive branch of government. Being put into place by Congress and the president, that made the law an legislative move rather than a judicial one. Since the country was deeply rooted in certain traditions such as racial segregation and sexual discrimination, the Bill of Rights were not really important legally speaking, which is why the supreme court did not need to issue a decision regarding it. It was not until the 20th century when these rights were used to challenge certain aspects of life, such as the abolition of segregation and definition of sexual harassment, which was brought before the supreme court for a final, legal...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Criminal Procedure Assignment

...Criminal Procedure Assignment Criminal Procedure Assignment In the three cases U.S.A. vs. Acevedo, U.S.A. vs. Chadwick and U.S.A.vs. Johnson, the court came out with different verdicts yet the cases were seen to have striking similarities. A summary of each case will be given in this paper and their similarities shown. Then, basing on the facts related to each case, the paper will explain why the court arrived at the different verdicts. U.S.A vs. Acevedo 500 U.S 565 (1991) held that police searching an automobile may only extend their search to a container inside the automobile without a warrant when they have probable cause to believe evidence or contraband is held in...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Current Trend in Criminal Law and Procedure for FREE!

Contact Us