Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Tort actions - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The tort actions I see in this scenario are the tort of battery (an intentional tort), intentional infliction of emotional distress and the tort of negligence. The potential plaintiffs are Malik and Daniel, who are also the potential defendants in this scenario…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.7% of users find it useful
Tort actions
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Tort actions"

Week 3 Scenario The tort actions I see in this scenario are the tort of battery (an intentional tort), intentional infliction of emotional distress and the tort of negligence. The potential plaintiffs are Malik and Daniel, who are also the potential defendants in this scenario. I mention that both parties are defendants because there was negligence on behalf of Malik and intentional harm on behalf of Daniel. The elements that I found for each of the plaintiffs claims are as follows: If Malik had not accidentially spilled the beer on Ruben (Daniels son), Daniel would not have got fired from his job, being accused of giving alcohol to a minor. Also, if it were not for Malik following Daniel and his son to the parking lot and pointing a gun at them, to scare them, there would be no intentional infliction of emotional distress. In the case of Malik vs Daniel, Daniel pushing him out of anger is an intentional tort of battery, with causation “but-for” tort of negligence. If Daniel had not pushed Malik, Malik would not have fallen, grabbing the side rail, fall and hit his face on the ground causing his two front teeth to be knocked out. In addition, Daniel shot Malik in defense, as Malik pulled a gun on him and his son. There are only two defenses that either party could use as a defense in court; Assumption of Risk and Comparative Negligence. I feel that in the case of the plaintiff Daniel Vs Malik (defendant), the courts would find in the defendants favor, stating it was comparative negligence and both parties had equal responsibility. Daniel had the duty to take care of his child and rid him of the beer smell on his clothes and that Malik had the duty to be more careful when drinking alcohol, but would owe something to Daniel for him being fired from his job, which is proximate cause. There for, neither party would receive full damages in regards to this claim a jury would decide who has more fault than the other does and amount recovered would be less. In the case of Malik (plaintiff) Vs Daniel, I feel the courts would find in the plaintiffs favor as he had a considerable amount more damages from being shot and the defendant (Daniel) started the physical fight. The courts would award him based on the comparative negligence defense and assumption of risk defense. He pulled out his gun to scare Daniel, knowing the risk could he could be killed if Daniel chose to defend himself and his child. Malik would recover some damages for medical bills, lost wages, but not pain and suffering as he brought this on himself. Scenario 3 The tort actions that see in this scenario are defamation (slander), negligence and tort of battery. The potential plaintiffs are Eric Vs Dependable Auto (Manager) and Raul Vs Dependable Auto (Manager). The only defendant that I find in this scenario is Dependable Auto. In regards to Eric, Dependable Auto’s manager is the defendant and liable because she is the direct cause for the defamation of character. In regards to Raul, Dependable Auto and the manager can both be held liable, because the incident happened on Dependable Auto’s property and by one of their employees, they can be held liable for their employee conduct or they can fire the manager and she will be liable alone for her actions. The elements that I found for each of the plaintiffs claims are as follows: In regards to Eric Vs Dependable Autos manager, when other salespeople asked about what happened, the manager told them that Eric was fired for stealing. This is slander and defamation of character, as the statement was about his honesty, reputation and integrity, it was directed at Eric and the other employees and provided damages for lost wages and being fired. In regards to Raul Vs Dependable Auto or/and the manager, the manager intended to shoot the staple gun at Raul, even though the intention was to scare him, damages resulted in him being shot in his eye causing permanent blindness. The two defenses that could be used to prove their case would be that for the defamation suit, what was said was the truth, regardless of the harm that resulted from the statement. In addition, contributory negligence, the accident and damages resulted from the combined negligence of both parties, Raul and the manager. Assumption of risk could also be used as a defense, as it could be proven that Raul picketing in front of the establishment, meant that he knew the potential risks of injury, from his conduct, yet decided to go forward anyway. I feel the courts would find in the plaintiffs (Eric) favor and award damages due to the lost wages and defamation. The plaintiff may be able to recover punitive damages, if the courts find there was a high level of carelessness on the defendants (manager) part. I feel the courts would also find in favor of the plaintiff (Raul), due to the intentional tort of battery as the managers intention was to fire the staple gun at Raul and ended up shooting him in the eye. The court would also award not only punitive damages to the plaintiff, but also damages for medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and emotional distress. Scenario 4 The tort actions I see in this scenario are the tort of battery (an intentional tort), intentional infliction of emotional distress and the tort of negligence. The plaintiffs are the man and his wife Vs Lee (Buy Mart) and Lee Vs Buy Mart (Security guard). The defendants are Lee, Buy Mart and the security guard. Lee is a defendant due to his intentional actions of loading the rifle and intentionally shooting the woman (torts of negligence: duty, breach of duty, causation, proximate cause and damages). Buy Mart as the harm occurred in their establishment, an employee sold the gun, and the security guard as Lee could sue him for damages and emotional distress. The elements that I found for each of the plaintiffs claims are as follows: Man and wife Vs Lee; Lee intentionally shot the woman with a rifle and due to Lees actions, seeing his wife shot caused the man to have a heart attack. Lee Vs Security guard; the guard in the heat of the moment and anger kicked Lee while he was unconscious, breaking his ribs, threatened him when Lee asked to seek medical attention saying “if you don’t shut up, I will break more of your ribs” and also denying him his right to seek medical attention. There is no defense for Lee, regarding to the shooting of the woman in Buy Mart. In regards to Lee’s case against the security guard, the defendant could claim assumption of risk, stating that since Lee already shot one person and was in the action of firing another one, it was his duty to help apprehend Lee. Moreover, that he was unaware of Lee being unconscious, he was just aware of the struggle between the employee and Lee. Lee Vs Security guard; I feel that the courts would find in favor of the defendant as the plaintiff intentionally shot a woman and throw out the case. In regards to the Man and his wife Vs Lee, I feel the courts will find in the plaintiffs favor, due to the torts of negligence and intentional harm. All of the elements of the torts of negligence have been established, including proximate cause meaning if it were not for the woman being shot and her husband witnessing, he would not have had a heart attack. I also feel that the courts would award the plaintiffs damages for medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages (if any), emotional distress and punitive damages. Works Cited Jennings, M. M. (2008). Business: Its Legal, Ethical and Global Environment, 8th ed. Mason: Cengage Learning. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Tort actions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Tort Actions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Tort Actions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


The Relationship between Contract and Tort in the Law of Obligations

.... In discussing this relationship, he states that the “ambiguity was never resolved”; the pervasive theme was the “friction on boundaries” between contract and tort and that the “scars are plainly visible in the Common law of the end of the twentieth century.”*6 The co-existence of breach of contract with the tort of negligence was also pointed out by Winfeld, who stated that there are “a large number of cases in which the foundation of action springs out of privity of contract between the parties but in which nevertheless the remedy is alternatively in contract or in tort.”*7 Yet, the classical view holds that there is a distinction between obligations under contract and tort, conditioned by the laissez faire doctrine in the will theory...
8 Pages(2000 words)Coursework

Tort Law of the United Kingdom: 3 Problem Questions

Trespass on land, goods, and person is altogether the most common type of tort, but in all cases, the main concern is the allocation of responsibility for whatever losses are sustained. For anyone party to be held responsible for violation of the tort law, the claimant must establish that there is a duty of care and that there has been a breach of that duty to cause damage or loss to the claimant that needs to be compensated by an award of damages. There is a breach of the duty-of-care principle if the defendant is proven to have failed to do what a reasonable person will do in the situation presented.

Francesca was a chambermaid of good standing at Hulton hotel until a regular hotel guest stormed into the manager&rsquo...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Act Tortious: Homeowners File a Tort Claim against a Theme Park

In criminal law, the state is portrayed as the bigger offended party than the plaintiff such that if a defendant is proven guilty the state metes out the appropriate punishment.  It is different in tort cases, in which the plaintiff, whose more popular assignation now is “claimant,” is the victim of the alleged wrong.  Once the defendant is found liable he is directed by the court to pay damages to the claimant or else to desist from the wrongful activity through “injunctive relief.” Compensation and deterrence are two of the four main purposes of a tort, the other two being appeasement and justice (Williams, 1951). 

The types of torts in England and Wales are limited to trespass t...
9 Pages(2250 words)Case Study

The Distinction Between the Tort of Negligence and the Tort of Nuisance

There are many instances in which establishing a claim in private nuisance does not require proof of negligence and it, therefore, remains necessary to maintain the tort of private nuisance distinct from the tort of negligence. The discussion that follows will demonstrate the necessity by comparing and contrasting both torts.
The tort of negligence is founded on the principles enunciated in the House of Lords decision in Donoghue v Stevenson which essentially defines the duty of care and situations in which a breach of that duty will give rise to a claim in negligence. Lord Atkin explained that we are required to take all necessary precautions to prevent injury to our neighbours. He goes on to fully explain the duty of care i...
17 Pages(4250 words)Case Study

Applied Land Law, Contract Law and Tort Law

There seems to be a lack of consideration to accompany the subsequent agreement between the parties for ABC Ltd. to pay the extra ₤10,000. In essence, ‘consideration’ refers to something of value, in a legal sense, flowing from Grabit to ABC Ltd. so as to enable Grabit to hold ABC Ltd. to its promise to pay that extra amount.
Grabit will obviously argue here that they are indeed doing something of value to ABC Ltd by building the extension of the warehouse. However, the problem is that this building of the extension is exactly what Grabit was already contractually bound to do under the ₤200,000 fixed price contract. As seen from Stilk v Myrick1, the general rule is that the performance of an existing contractual d...
11 Pages(2750 words)Assignment

Analysis of Biography and Actions of Tom Harkin - Iowas Senator

...Senator Tom Harkin Brief Biography Senator Tom Harkin is a democrat from Iowa representing the 5th district. Senator Harkin graduated from Iowa State University in government and economics in 1962 on a scholarship from ROTC, after which he served in the Navy for five years. After his active duty, he became a member of first the Ready Reserves, and then the Naval Reserves retiring in 1989 as a Commander. He graduated from The Catholic University of America’s Columbus School of Law in 1972. In 1969, Harkin went to Vietnam as an aide to Democrat Congressman Neal Smith where he witnessed the ‘tiger cages’ (a cramped cage intended to leave the prisoner no room to move or get comfortable, depriving sleep and constant and increasing... Tom...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Contract and tort law

Being a public organisation, the Council had the duty of ensuring that anyone who builds on the land adhered to the limitation and/or the potential limitations that the toxic substances found on the land caused.
Thus, in granting the authorisation to build on the land, the Council should have factored that in before considering whether to grant or reject the license to build. However, they went ahead and granted a license to Max which gave him the right to build or advertise for others to build on the land.
It is therefore conclusive that by granting the authorisation to build on the land, when the council was privy to information about the dangers of inhabiting the land and the potential freeze on the land, the council wa...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

Global Warming and Human Actions

...Running Head: Global Warming and Human Actions Global Warming and Human Actions Name Course Tutor Date Introduction Global warming refers to the augmented intensity of carbon dioxide gas in the earth’s atmosphere resulting in increased global temperatures leading to climatic changes. The Earth’s temperature is controlled via a balance of the sun’s input energy and its subsequent loss into the atmosphere. There are some atmospheric gases, referred to as greenhouse gases, which are very important to the atmospheric temperature balance. The sun releases energy to the atmosphere in form of radiations and some scientists argue that approximately a third of the energy released by the sun to the earth are reflected to the space upon...
11 Pages(2750 words)Term Paper

Is Global Warming due to Human Actions

... of paper] and number] submitted] Choice Two –Is global warming due to human actions? Can the human race take action to stop global warming? Global warming has become a major topic of debate all over the world. This is because global warming touches upon quite a few areas which are very significant to understand within the relevant thick of things. Since global warming concentrates its basis towards addressing the issues which take care of the earth’s climate, the comprehension levels are therefore very significant to understand. It is in the same wake that global warming is being discussed by varied proponents of the international environmental bodies and organizations, as they seek to find a common good within the realms...
8 Pages(2000 words)Term Paper

Software Quality Assurance - The effectiveness of systems integrity assurance actions

...Software Quality Assurance – Effectiveness of Systems Integrity Assurance Actions: The Case of Maxil Aerospace ID: Software Quality Assurance – Effectiveness of Systems Integrity Assurance Actions: The Case of Maxil Aerospace Maxil Aerospace has been in the aviation business for many years, having kept a clean record throughout its lifetime. The company, based in Middleton, designs and develops aircraft that it then sells to commercial airlines. The scope of the company’s activities employs a lot of locals in Middleton, therefore, making it a key economic pillar of the region. Whereas Maxil Aerospace’s business has been largely successful it has been experiencing a lot of challenges in the recent past. Mr. Spencer-Jones, the CEO admits...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Tort actions for FREE!

Contact Us