Labow Law of The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the US - Essay Example

Download file to see previous pages The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United State of America, which are the subject of comparison in this research, had, various aspects of life such as politics, economy and law. Of course, there i+s different backgrounds in labor law in both countries. In this chapter, we will refer to the historical stages of labor law in every state. ( )
United States labor law background:
The employer took their labor trouble to court almost as soon as America became independent. Each state has its own court, and they often have disagreed with one another about labor cases.
Because the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the freedom of association, the court did not outlaw unions as such. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, a common union tactic was for union members to agree among themselves how much in wage they would accept from their employers; the members also refused to work in the same shop as any other worker who accepted less than union scale. However, the courts held that this tactic was a criminal conspiracy,( ) (will be the case as an example under the minimum wage section below).
By the end of the nineteenth century, prosecutions for criminal conspiracy had become ineffective in controlling labor unions. There were two reasons for this change. First, a criminal case was too slow. The work could not be punished until after an indictment was issued and the case had gone to trial. This process took several months, during which the strike or boycott was damaging the employer’s business. Second, jurieswrer increasingly made up of workers, not merely shopkeepers and landowners; and workers were hesitant to find coworkers guilty of the crime peacefully trying to improve their wage and working conditions. Employers, therefore, took their complaints to civil court, and here they found the perfect weapon for fighting unions: the injunction. In the past, the law permitted judges to issue injunctions against unions freely.
In 1890, Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act in order to control monopolies in business, but the wording of the law was so general that it could be applied to labor unions as well. ...Download file to see next pages Read More