Critically analyse the territorial and extraterritorial ambit of the offence of murder under English Criminal Law - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Territorial And Extraterritorial Ambit Of The Offense Of Murder Under English Criminal Law Name Institution Introduction According to English Law, murder is a crime at Common law. Therefore the definition of murder is a common law and not defined under any statute by parliament…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.6% of users find it useful
Critically analyse the territorial and extraterritorial ambit of the offence of murder under English Criminal Law
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Critically analyse the territorial and extraterritorial ambit of the offence of murder under English Criminal Law"

Download file to see previous pages die of the wound or hurt etc. within a year and a day after the same” (Allen 309). It is imperative to note that under the English criminal system, murder is classified into the category of homicide and manslaughter. Legally, homicide is a more serious offence in comparison to manslaughter. In order for a person to be charged with homicide or manslaughter, the elements of the definition of murder must be proved to be true. Actus Reus Under the English Law, the Actus Reus for murder must be present before one can be convicted for the offence of murder. One aspect of Actus Reus is that act of murder must be unlawful. This implies that act should not have any legal basis to justify its occurrence. Under the English criminal system, the law recognizes some circumstances under which murder can be justified. For instance, killing someone in self defense can be admissible in a court as a legally permissible reason for murder. The justification for killing also depends on the circumstances under which the deceased was killed and the role of the accused in the murder (Chalmers & Fiona 219). In essence, killing under English law may include accelerating another person’s death due to an act or an omission. ...
This means that any killing that occurs under all circumstances except during war are is classified as an offence of murder. Enemy killing is not justified by law unless it occurs during a war or events thereof (David 453). English Law is precise in regards to the concept of “Queen’s peace” by expressly stating that all situations except during war are classified as “Queen’s peace”. Even formally identified foreign enemies cannot be lawfully killed under the pretext that they are outside the scope of the Queen’s peace. It is imperative to that this principle applies both within and outside the territories of the English criminal law. The specific act or omission that results in the murder of a person must have a substantial contribution as cause of death for an accused person to be convicted for the offence of murder. The act or omission and the death must be linked in order for a conviction to be upheld. In essence, the prosecution has the burden of proving that the accused did more than minimally or negligibly contribute to the death. The contribution of the accused person to the death must be considered substantial in the context of the law (Hirst 229). In this regard, even if the action or omission just accelerated the death, the accused is legally liable for the death. For instance, in R v Dyson (1908), it was held that the defendant was liable for the offence of murder even though the defendant had only hastened death. In order to break the causation chain, it is upon the defendant to prove that the intervening act was the main cause of the death (Cryer 152). This may occur in instances whereby a person’s actions or inactions are part of a chain of actions that can be attributed to the death. It is only an unforeseeable or unexpected action ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Critically analyse the territorial and extraterritorial ambit of the Assignment”, n.d.)
Critically analyse the territorial and extraterritorial ambit of the Assignment. Retrieved from
(Critically Analyse the Territorial and Extraterritorial Ambit of the Assignment)
Critically Analyse the Territorial and Extraterritorial Ambit of the Assignment.
“Critically Analyse the Territorial and Extraterritorial Ambit of the Assignment”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Critically analyse the territorial and extraterritorial ambit of the offence of murder under English Criminal Law

Dishonesty in Criminal Law: Analyzing the Offence of theft

...Law Dishonesty in Criminal Law: Analyzing the Offence of theft (as defined by section1 Theft Act 1968) and the Ghosh [1982 QB1053 test of dishonesty. According to the theft Act 1968, a person is termed as being answerable to theft if he appropriates another persons’ property dishonestly especially with an aim of depriving the original owner of this property. The Act does not take into consideration if the appropriation of the property is made with intent of deriving benefit from the thief or not. As pertains to dishonesty, the Act documents that an individual cannot be termed as being dishonesty if the individual appropriates another persons’ property with the belief...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Criminal justice/ criminal law

...?Q: Reflecting on the conflicts of interest evident in the progress of the first trial before the International Criminal Court, critically analyse the aims of the ICC against: the context of legitimacy, and; suggestions that the ICC should not aspire to influence peace-building and global governance. 1.0 Introduction The International Criminal Court (ICC) is a product of a century-long search for an international entity that could bring perpetrators of crimes that cannot be handled by a national court to justice, for one reason or another. The ICC, however, is not merely a tribunal that tries specific crimes, but an international entity that carries with it the...
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

Sexual Offence the nature, proof, relevance and judicial control of good character evidence is essential for criminal defendants48. For many individuals, there are no other weapons to fight with than their good character. Refuting evidence should not be constrained to evidence of reputation. The decision from Rowton (1865) should be formally overruled49. Conclusion Under section 33 (2) of the Criminal Appeal Act of 1968, the point of law of general public importance was involved in the decision of this case whether in a trial for persistently importuning for immoral purposes, that are contrary to section 32 of the Sexual Offences act 1956, when the defendant...
11 Pages(2750 words)Case Study

Crime of murder/Criminal Law

...Running Head: CRIMINAL LAW Criminal Law of Criminal Law Section 187 of the California Penal Code 1873, defines murder as the "unlawful killing of a human being or a fetus with malice aforethought". According to this section, an act will constitute murder, if a person willfully and with malicious intent causes the death of another. Malice or intention specified in this section can be express or implied. Express malice is a deliberate intention in the mind of the person committing the act of taking another's life and implied malice is a situation where there is no provocation or reason for the accused...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Law Relating to Murder

...(For citations please refer to table of cases down below) This question requires a discussion of the law relating to murder and whether based on the defence of intoxication Zak is able to get his sentence extinguished or based on the defence of provocation or diminished responsibility he can plead manslaughter to a charge of murder. Thus the discussion here will be based upon a detailed analysis of the law relating to the offence of Murder and relevant offences of Provocation, Diminished Responsibility and Intoxication. The charge of murderMurder is the killing of a human being by a...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

English Criminal law Problem question - Discuss the criminal liability, if any, of Bruiser for the murder of Dot

...Criminal liability of Bruiser According to English law, the definition of murder is given as the killing of another person whether by act or omission having either the intention to kill (with "malice aforethought") or to cause grievous bodily harm1. In order to establish a cause of action for willful murder, there are two factors that must be established (a) the causing of the death of another human being and (b) the intent to cause grievous bodily harm, which is referred to as ‘malice afterthought’ and (c) the physical act of injury must match with a mens rea or the requirement of the ‘guilty mind’. In the event the actus rea and the mens rea are...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Torture under International Criminal Law

... not have been possible under the concept of international law. Under international law, states are of equal stature and leaders are immune from prosecution by international tribunals. Although international criminal law is under international law, and both utilize the same international conventions or statutes, their application differs. As can be observed, the development of international criminal law is traced to the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations, the first international association of nations, for the mutual protection of nations and political and territorial integrity and independence of nations. However, as commented by legal writers, it is the concept of sovereignty of nations that hindered the development... &url=...
21 Pages(5250 words)Essay

Criminal Justice/ Criminal Law

...Criminal Justice/ Criminal Law: Burden of Proof Criminal Justice/ Criminal Law: Burden of Proof Many are the times when peoplehave watched movies and films which dwell on criminal investigations and legal drama. In these films, the different aspects that are required for the prosecution, arraignment in court as well as sentencing of a person are brought forth. But some of the terms that are used in these films are never paid attention to and many just follow the plot. Terms such as criminal evidence, burden of proof, and innocent until proven guilty and beyond any reasonable doubt are seen as part of the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper

Critically analyse financial statemebt

...however may pay some returns to investors while retaining most of its asset for reinvest to keep itself a going concern under the regulation of the government (Registrar of Societies). III. Conclusion The three types of financial statements differ in their features because of the nature of their operations and the consideration of the different audience which these financial statements serve. In the sole trader, financial statements only serves the sole owner and thus needs not to be complex nor adhere to IFRS standards because its audience is only its owner in addition to the regulating agency. Limited Companies are complex because the financial statement serves a multitude of audience which includes the various...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

US Criminal Law: A Murder from the Perspective of US Criminal Law

...US Criminal Law: A Murder from the Perspective of US Criminal Law Introduction Criminal law or criminal justice system is the practice performed by the law and order institutions of governments in order to uphold the social control with the intention of deterring and mitigating crime. The institutions sanction criminal penalties and rehabilitation efforts to those who found and proved to be guilty in violating the described law for checking the criminal offense. However, under the litigation of criminal...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Critically analyse the territorial and extraterritorial ambit of the offence of murder under English Criminal Law for FREE!

Contact Us