Nobody downloaded yet

Judicial activism of the European Court of Justice - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Name: University: Course: Tutor: Date: Judicial activism of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) Introduction Judicial activism refers to the assumption of legislative powers by a court by way of creating policy. In this case, there is a transfer of decision making rights from the cabinet, the legislature or the civil service to the courts…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.1% of users find it useful
Judicial activism of the European Court of Justice
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Judicial activism of the European Court of Justice"

Download file to see previous pages In spite of this, the ECJ tends to take a cautious approach in adopting the policy. It is worth noting that the ECJ has a constant need to develop general principles for procedural purposes, which can sometimes be interpreted as activism (Kelly 315). Unlike federal states, there is no hierarchy relation between European community laws and national laws. Therefore, these two sets of laws coexist in the European judicial environment. As such, there is a need for certain comprehensive principles to resolve problems arising from conflict between these two sets of laws and the ECJ took up this boundary-pushing duty of setting up principles such as the direct effect and primacy. The EU Treaty does not assign the ECJ federation duties and its assumption of this role can be interpreted as judicial activism (Kelly 315). Member states, institutions and individuals in the EU are bound by the constitutional principles developed by the ECJ when they act within the community. In a series of decisions, passed in the 1960s and 1970s, the ECJ established doctrines that have served as precedents of a theory of legal intervention into the relationship between Member States and the Community. In an apparently activist approach, the ECJ held that the provisions of the Treaty could have a direct effect in its ruling on the 1963 Van Gend en Loos case. This essentially means that individuals and private citizens could sue national governments in the national courts for failing to enforce the Treaty. In its declaration, the ECJ stipulated that the Treaty is superior to an agreement that creates mutual obligations between contracting states insisting that the Community constitutes a new legal order of international law limiting the sovereignty of states within limited fields (Abels and Joyce 59). In the case of Costa v. ENEL, the ECJ established the supremacy doctrine meaning that state transfers of legal powers were irreversible and permanently limited their sovereign rights. In its ruling, the ECJ decreed that the EEC treaty was no ordinary international treaty and had its own legal system which upon enforcement of the Treaty became an integral part of the legal systems of Member States and their courts were bound by the system. It further stated that the creation of a community of unlimited duration, with its own institutions, personality, legal capacity, capacity of representation on the international plane and most importantly, real powers limiting sovereignty of Member States or the transfer of power from the states to the Community, members had effectively limited their sovereign rights, within limited fields, creating a body of law binding their nationals and themselves(Abels and Joyce 59). In the Francovich case, the court resolute that the failure of Member States to swap orders amounts to a breach of Community law and as such were obliged to compensate harm suffered by individuals. The court in its ruling held that the complete efficiency of Community rules would be compromised, and the protection of the rights they grant weakened if individuals were denied redress when their rights were infringed by violation of Community law for which a Member State was responsible (Dougan 157). The ECJ developed the preemption doctrine in a series of cases. This doctrine implied that ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Judicial activism of the European Court of Justice Essay”, n.d.)
Judicial activism of the European Court of Justice Essay. Retrieved from
(Judicial Activism of the European Court of Justice Essay)
Judicial Activism of the European Court of Justice Essay.
“Judicial Activism of the European Court of Justice Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Judicial activism of the European Court of Justice

Discretion Granted to National Courts in Relation to the EU Legal Order

...court has the right to refer to the previous rulings (Rasmussen, 1984). Acte Clair Doctrine and its Reception by UK Courts The European Court of Justice defines the “Acte Clair” doctrine and gives the national court the power not to refer any issue if the ruling is clear and fair and does not raise any doubts. This doctrine was introduced mainly since most of the national court never made any reference to the Article 234 of the European Court of Justice most often citing that their ruling was obvious. However, the Article 234 does not precisely define the “Acte Clair”...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay


...? JUDICIAL ACTIVISM BY EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE . Introduction The European Community Courts have played a decisive role in the integration process of the European Union. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has especially assumed key role by constantly pursuing legal assimilation in the EU by offering flesh and substance to an outline Treaty, thereby plugging in loopholes in the European laws, and improving the effective implementation of Community law in the provinces of the member states1. In case of ambiguities in the text of the Treaties, ECJ has to employ its creative talents so as to accomplish an acceptable elucidation and application of Community law. ECJ has filled in the gaps and removed the imprecision in the provinces... as...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism of judicial activism, in which a school district had its policies overturned by the court. This should be considered to be activism, as the school district is not allowed by the court to pass policies for itself that would help remedy individual cases of discrimination. However, since this case cases involves reverse discrimination, this case would not be decried by the conservatives who typically decry judicial activism. A. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, 551 U.S. 701 (2007). Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, 551 U.S. 701 (2007) is an equal...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Judicial activism

...ROPER V. SIMMONS Debbie Whitmore Academia-Research, Inc. June 23, 2005 Judicial activism and restraint are points of controversy for politicians, general public and the Supreme Court itself. Judicial activism refers to the court's willingness to become involved in major issues and the extent that it makes decisions based on constitutional grounds. Judicial restraint is when the Court takes the stand that law making is to be left to the legislators and it opposes the nullification of a law only when the Constitution is unquestionably violated. It has been said that...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

European Court of Justice

..."The ECJ's refusal to countenance the horizontal direct effect of directives is based on unconvincing arguments. Furthermore the ECJ's various attempts to mitigate the effects of the lack of horizontal direct effect of directives by creating an array of additional doctrines has led to an unacceptable degree of confusion." Introduction The notion of direct effect which is rights conferred on individuals by the Community law to be enforced in national courts has not been openly contained in the EC Treaties. This idea was formulated first in the European Court of Justice's during the judgment of Van Gend en Loos in 1963.1 This case was a landmark in the history of the ECJ...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

The constitutional jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice is a paradigm of judicial Activism. Discuss in relation to Art. 234 EC

...Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice Introduction: The formal role of the European Court of Justice, as set out in the Treaty, is merely to “ensure that in the interpretation and application of this Treaty, the law is observed.”1 According to George Bermann, the “EEC Treaty.....was conceived as an international agreement, and only later came to be viewed as a constitutional document.”2 The judicial rulings of the ECJ in the 1960s and 1970s have in effect resulted in a constitutionalization of the treaties establishing the European Union through its jurisprudence. In fact, according to D....
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Judicial Activism

...Judicial Activism The issue as to whether judges should interpret or apply the constitution is debatable. There are cases where much caution and attention is needed to define the outcome of a court case. Basically, the constitution is seen by advocators of judges being interpreters as a laid down framework to decide on a case. Scalia (1972) asserts that the constitution is supposed to guide the judge to solve any dilemma with a judicial bearing. To a larger extent, the judicial function incorporates interpretation of the provisions of law. However, there are numerous debates intended to question the manner and extent of interpretation of law by any...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Judicial restraint and judicial activism

...Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism The doctrine of judicial activism is based on the belief that the federal judiciary is supposed to take an active function by utilizing its powers to examine the activities of the state legislatures, administrative agencies, and the Congress (this is in the case where the aforementioned government bodies go beyond their authority). The Supreme Court acted in an activist manner in the period between 1953 and 1969, and this is in an era when Chief Justice Earl Warren headed the Court. The Warren Court instigated the civil rights onward by suggesting that the laws allowing racial segregation were in violation of the equal protection clause (Bardes, Schmidt, and Shelley 459). On the other hand... , the...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

European Court of Justices Activism in European Integration

...). Thus, despite the hostility among several nations within the continent, the concept of the European integration has been successful in bringing cooperation and evidence suggests that European Union (EU) can be considered as the “most ambitious and successful” venture towards willing cooperation among nations (19). Analysis of European Court of Justice’s Judicial Activism in European Integration: The first allegations of the judicial activism of ECJ have surfaced in 1990 and its waves kept rippling throughout the course of a decade, only to die out...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Judicial Activism

...Judicial Activism Judicial Activism The ideas presented by both legal luminaries Attorney General Edwin Meese and Justice WilliamJ. Brennan were insightful and provided me with a greater understanding of the various ways on how to interpret the Constitution as well on how to determine its purpose and intent. After reading and pondering on the arguments of both sides, I am more inclined to side with judicial activism as argued by Brennan that the Constitution must be viewed as living and evolving and as law that is responsive to the realities of the time, rather than Meese’s argument of judicial restraint...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Judicial activism of the European Court of Justice for FREE!

Contact Us