Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Answer the questions below and support your points using case law not the textbook references - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Law Essay Question 1 Explain the meaning and the difference between an offer and an invitation to treat in contract law Issue The meaning and difference between an offer and an invitation to treat in contract law. Rule A party who makes an offer makes itself legally liable to another party…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.2% of users find it useful
Answer the questions below and support your points using case law not the textbook references
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Answer the questions below and support your points using case law not the textbook references"

Download file to see previous pages Similarly, an advertisement or brochure does not constitute an offer, but only an attempt to obtain an offer. However, the display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat. Application In Harvey v Facey [1893] AC 552, it was held that it was insufficient to just provide a statement regarding the price. In this case the plaintiff had asked the defendant, by means of a telegram, whether he would sell the Bumper Hall Pen and to quote the lowest cash price. The reply was to be given by telegram to the plaintiff. To this the defendant replied that the lowest price would be ? 900. In reply the plaintiff conveyed his consent and stated that he would purchase it for that price and asked the defendant to send the title deeds of that piece of land. The court held that there was no contract between these parties, as the mere statement of price did not constitute an offer and was nothing more than the provision of information. In Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd [1953] EWCA Civ 6, the Appellate Court deemed the shop sign to be an invitation to treat. In this case, the issue considered was when a sale was completed in a self service shop. The court held that the sale was completed when the medicine had been selected and taken to the shop assistant, who then accepted it and completed the contract. The display of goods on the shelves of the shop was not an offer but merely an invitation to treat. This was reiterated by the court in Fisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394, in which Lord Chief Justice Parker held that the mere display of a knife with a price tag in a shop window did not constitute an offer for sale. In this case, the shop had displayed a prohibited type of knife in a shop window. The legislation in force had prohibited the offer of such items for sale. This was deemed to be an invitation to treat and not an offer by the learned chief justice. Conclusion Offer can become a contract after its acceptance. An Invitation to Treat is not an offer, which can be accepted, and is merely an invitation for offers. Question 2 Explain the standard of care owed by one person to another in the tort of negligence Issue The standard of care owed by one person to another in the tort of negligence. Rule The standard of care owed by one person to another in torts, is based on the notions of reasonableness and foreseeability. Contributory negligence in the context of personal injury and death relates to the failure of a person, usually the plaintiff, to adopt reasonable measure to promote safety, which contributes to the injury suffered by that person. Damages awarded by the Australian courts are reduced to the extent of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff. Application There is a clear distinction between the notions of reasonableness and foreseeability. Thus in Bolton v Stone [1951] AC 850, their Lordships ruled that although it was foreseeable for injury to occur due to being hit by a cricket ball that had been struck over the boundary fence, it was very much unlikely to happen, and that this was sufficient justification for the respondents to ignore the risk. In general, it is unreasonable to undertake a risk that is foreseeable. However, when the chances of the risk taking place are very meagre, a reasonable person will undertake the risk. Another major consideration relates to the seriousness of the injury caused. Thus, in Paris v Stepney Borough Council ...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Answer the questions below and support your points using case law not Essay”, n.d.)
Answer the questions below and support your points using case law not Essay. Retrieved from
(Answer the Questions below and Support Your Points Using Case Law Not Essay)
Answer the Questions below and Support Your Points Using Case Law Not Essay.
“Answer the Questions below and Support Your Points Using Case Law Not Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Answer the questions below and support your points using case law not the textbook references

Canadian Corporate Business Law

This was done by virtue of a loan to Ashley in the sum of $300,000 providing Temper with a first mortgage against the suite.
Two politicians invest in Temper, Stefan di Yawn who invests $500,000 in respect of 500 Class A shares and Bob Eh invests $100,000 for 100 Class A shares. In order to secure these investments, the politicians take a security interest in Temper. Shortly after the company experiences some difficulty beginning with Angelina who is photographed spitting on the sidewalks which gets the attention of politician Hillary Squinton who ran her campaign on a clean sidewalks platform. She initiates action against Angelina by taking the matter up with Spitting on Streets Board chaired by Angelina’s boyfriend Br...
11 Pages (2750 words) Case Study

Family Law: Breakdown Of Marriage

In general, contesting a divorce is a difficult issue and grounds for divorce are generally allowed by the Courts. If one party makes a decision that the marital relationship is no longer working, the Courts are likely to accept this decision and grant the divorce.

While adultery is one of the important grounds for granting a divorce, John claims in this instance that he has not had an affair with Emma. Possibly, if this was the only issue at stake, he could have contested the divorce. However, there is also the additional issue of unreasonable behavior, which are also good grounds for the grant of a divorce. Isabel has made attempts to get him to see a therapist and has tolerated his depression and withdrawal during hi...
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

How Tomatoes Can Help Your Heart

Whether tomato is a fruit or vegetable? Well, this question can be answered in both ways. Botanically, tomato is a fruit but it is so frequently used as a culinary item all over the world, it is also considered as a vegetable. Long time back, the tomato was considered as fruit and helped the exporters to avoid taxation but 1893 the Supreme Court put an over this dispute by declaring that tomato was a vegetable and since that time onwards, tomatoes were taxed accordingly. Keeping in harmony with this tradition, till date tomatoes are served as entrée and very rarely as dessert. Apart from side dishes, wide array of main course dishes are also prepared from tomatoes and these dishes are regarded considered as lip-smacking cui...
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Organization and Functions of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies

Threats may either appear in the form of terrorism or from other intelligence groups or from the espionage. It may arise within the country, against the existing government or social systems. Though most of the federal law enforcement groups are investigative groups, they are not only focused on investigations but stand for the people. One can see that the importance of the federal agencies is growing day by day because the threats from militants and others have considerably increased. Such kinds of federal law enforcement agencies include Federal Air Marshalls, Secret Service, FBI, Untouchables, C.I.A and Federal Corrections etc. The organization and functions of these agencies vary in different fields and can be cited in the fol...
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Company Law Issues

Various sections of the CA are coming into force over a staged process and the relevant provision relating to authority is sections 39 and 40, which came into force on 1 October 2007.

Section 39(1) of the CA provides that “the validity of any act done by a company shall not be called into question on the ground of lack of capacity by reason of anything in the company’s constitution”

Additionally, section 40(1) provides that: “In favor of a person dealing with a company in good faith, the power of the board of directors to bind the company, or authorize others to do so, shall be deemed to be free of any limitation under the company’s constitution”.

Section 40 (2)...
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Contract Law

This expression of willingness can assume several forms, such as a facsimile, letter, electronic mail or a telephonic message. The intention is an objective consideration and in the case of Smith v, Hughes 4 relevant consideration was deemed to be the manner in which a reasonable person would view intention. Furthermore, the law distinguishes between an offer and an invitation to treat. The latter is not an offer but merely an indication of willingness to negotiate a contract.

An instance of this is provided by the case of Gibson v Manchester City Council5. In this case, the phrase may be prepared to sell was held to constitute an invitation to treat and not an offer. Indeed, the Gibson decision challenged the tradition...
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Constitutional and Administrative Law

When examining the decision of previous court comments that are made obiter dicta will not be part of the precedent since often obiter dicta comments are speculative remarks on how the judge might have acted if the facts had been different.

Binding precedents come from earlier case law and, as suggested in the wording, must be followed even if the judge in the present case does not agree with the legal reasoning of the judge in the earlier case. In order for a precedent to be binding the facts of the present case to have to be sufficiently similar to the earlier case. Decisions given in a lower court to the one in which the present case is being heard will not be binding. For a decision to set a precedent it must have b...
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Analysis of OReilly v Mackman Case

Judicial review is a concept which is constitutionally undecided as it on one side, it shores up the rule of law, democracy, and pre-eminence of parliament by facilitating the courts to check the boundaries of government authority and on another side, the courts are open to the decision on the plants based on the fact of separation of authorities that are intimating with the verdicts of democratically elected institutions. Judicial review is not apprehended with the virtues of government assessment but deals with whether the deciding authority has remained within the legal boundaries and whether broad principles of rationality and fairness adhere. The constitutional basis of judicial review is debated as one view holds that it is...
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

The Law on Physical Punishment of Children Fails to give Sufficient Respect to Childrens Rights

Under the English criminal law, several past and current legislations were made in order to protect the children from corporal punishment or becoming a victim of physical abuse. Despite our effort to prevent parents from using physical force in disciplining their children, the British Government remains unconvinced that the law which protects the children from physical punishment is sufficient (Keating, 2008). Physical punishment such as ‘smacking’, ‘slapping’, ‘kicking’, or ‘spanking’ is referring to the act of causing a degree of pain or discomfort to the child. (Niland, 2009, p. 6) With regard to the legal issues behind child protection against physical abuse, this study aims to d...
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework

Analysis of Tourism and Hospitality Law Case

 The main issue that needs to be tackled first is whether there is a valid contract between Richard Brat, carrying on trade as Brighton Greens, (buyer) and Molly and Kelly trading in First Grade Granny Smith apples as Holy Farm.

Apparently, there was, when considering their verbal and written mail sent by Richard to Holy Farm on August 1 reading as follows –“Please deliver 20 boxes –Granny Smith ‘Brighton Greens’. Cheque mailed.“

It may be seen that the mail order does not specify the category or grade of apples to be supplied, but one of the implied conditions of sale could be that the goods ordered need to correspond with the goods inspected and tested.

In th...
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Answer the questions below and support your points using case law not the textbook references for FREE!

Contact Us