StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Organisation law case study - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Organisational Law Case Study Part A In our problem, Su and Yana, the directors of the company Free Spirit Pty Ltd, had taken improper decisions such as to purchase the sports equipment from a company named Sporting Edge Pty Ltd. This company was owned and controlled by Yana and Su…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.4% of users find it useful
Organisation law case study
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Organisation law case study"

Download file to see previous pages This clearly indicates the intention of Yana and Su to promote their own company’s interests rather than the interests of Free Spirit Pty Ltd. Yana Yana is an executive director of the company. To determine whether she had fulfilled the obligations as a director, prescribed by the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 and the common law, the following issues have been taken up for discussion. The Corporations Act 2001 requires directors to exercise due care and diligence during the discharge of their duties towards the company. This has been specified under Section 180 of this Act. Such due care entails protecting the interests of creditors and the interests of the shareholders when the company is expecting to become insolvent. This was held in the Credit Lyonnais case (Keay & Zhang, 2008, p. 142). The duties of company’s directors are specified under Sections 180 to 184 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Muscillo, 2009). Section 180 of this act protects directors who take decisions in good faith and for a proper purpose or when they reasonably believe that their decision will further the best interests of the company (Tesarsch and Tiller, 2010). It is incumbent upon directors to act solely for the bona fide purposes of a company. This was the gist of the ruling in Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Ltd (1974). A director is liable if he relies on the information provided by others and as a result fails to notice mismanagement in the conduct of company affairs. Whenever there is an attempt to embark upon a very risky venture, directors of the company are required to be sufficiently circumspect. This was the ruling in Daniels v Anderson (1995). As such, in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (2009), the Supreme Court of New South Wales had to determine if a breach of duty toward their company had been committed by the officers and company directors of James Hardie Industries Ltd. In particular it was to be ascertained whether the duty of care and diligence stipulated in Section 180(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 had been breached due to the provision of a defective media statement to the Australian Securities Exchange regarding the ability of the company to meet certain future liabilities (Hargovan, 2009, p. 986).The Supreme Court ruled that these directors and officers of the company had breached their duty of care. In addition, the court also held the company in breach of its statutory obligations under the continuous disclosure provisions. A director has to comply with the requirements of the business judgement rule in order to obtain protection under Section 180 (2). As Yana had acted in a manner that was detrimental to the interests of the company, she cannot resort to such defence. She had purchased sports equipment at a higher price from her own company, and this clearly indicates the absence of loyalty and due care on the part of Yana. She has decided to expand the business of the company, Free Spirit Pty Ltd, to Alaska without assessing the legal and financial aspects of the company in that area in the future. Yana has breached the duties of good faith and due diligence, as per the provisions of the Corporations Act. She cannot evade liability for violation of the provisions of fiduciary duties of directors under the Corporations Act and common law. As per the decided case law, she is liable for breach of fiduciary duties, due care and diligence. Su Su is the finance director of the company Free Spirit Pty Lt ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Organisation law case study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Organisation law case study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1401093-organisation-law-case-study
(Organisation Law Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
Organisation Law Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1401093-organisation-law-case-study.
“Organisation Law Case Study Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1401093-organisation-law-case-study.
  • Cited: 1 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Organisation law case study

Canadian Corporate Business Law

This was done by virtue of a loan to Ashley in the sum of $300,000 providing Temper with a first mortgage against the suite.
Two politicians invest in Temper, Stefan di Yawn who invests $500,000 in respect of 500 Class A shares and Bob Eh invests $100,000 for 100 Class A shares. In order to secure these investments, the politicians take a security interest in Temper. Shortly after the company experiences some difficulty beginning with Angelina who is photographed spitting on the sidewalks which gets the attention of politician Hillary Squinton who ran her campaign on a clean sidewalks platform. She initiates action against Angelina by taking the matter up with Spitting on Streets Board chaired by Angelina’s boyfriend Br...
11 Pages(2750 words)Case Study

Country Study: Mali

The territory of Mali has had a great history. We have been centers of the Ghana Empire, the Mali Empire, and the Songhai Empire for about six centuries. Thereafter, during the 17th and 18th centuries, several small states developed along the Niger basin, but they fell during the holy war waged by Muslim leader Al-Hajj Umar, whose kingdom extended from Timbuktu to headwaters of Niger and Senegal. His successor, Ahmadu was defeated by the French in 1860. (http://us-africa.tripod.com /mali.html)

As is well-known, we have had a turbulent past. We were a French colony for 80 years until we achieved independence. Now we are a multi-party democracy with Presidential form of Government. While the executive power rests with the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

Family Law: Breakdown Of Marriage

In general, contesting a divorce is a difficult issue and grounds for divorce are generally allowed by the Courts. If one party makes a decision that the marital relationship is no longer working, the Courts are likely to accept this decision and grant the divorce.

While adultery is one of the important grounds for granting a divorce, John claims in this instance that he has not had an affair with Emma. Possibly, if this was the only issue at stake, he could have contested the divorce. However, there is also the additional issue of unreasonable behavior, which are also good grounds for the grant of a divorce. Isabel has made attempts to get him to see a therapist and has tolerated his depression and withdrawal during hi...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study

Organization and Functions of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies

Threats may either appear in the form of terrorism or from other intelligence groups or from the espionage. It may arise within the country, against the existing government or social systems. Though most of the federal law enforcement groups are investigative groups, they are not only focused on investigations but stand for the people. One can see that the importance of the federal agencies is growing day by day because the threats from militants and others have considerably increased. Such kinds of federal law enforcement agencies include Federal Air Marshalls, Secret Service, FBI, Untouchables, C.I.A and Federal Corrections etc. The organization and functions of these agencies vary in different fields and can be cited in the fol...
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study

Company Law Issues

Various sections of the CA are coming into force over a staged process and the relevant provision relating to authority is sections 39 and 40, which came into force on 1 October 2007.

Section 39(1) of the CA provides that “the validity of any act done by a company shall not be called into question on the ground of lack of capacity by reason of anything in the company’s constitution”

Additionally, section 40(1) provides that: “In favor of a person dealing with a company in good faith, the power of the board of directors to bind the company, or authorize others to do so, shall be deemed to be free of any limitation under the company’s constitution”.

Section 40 (2)...
9 Pages(2250 words)Case Study

Contract Law

This expression of willingness can assume several forms, such as a facsimile, letter, electronic mail or a telephonic message. The intention is an objective consideration and in the case of Smith v, Hughes 4 relevant consideration was deemed to be the manner in which a reasonable person would view intention. Furthermore, the law distinguishes between an offer and an invitation to treat. The latter is not an offer but merely an indication of willingness to negotiate a contract.

An instance of this is provided by the case of Gibson v Manchester City Council5. In this case, the phrase may be prepared to sell was held to constitute an invitation to treat and not an offer. Indeed, the Gibson decision challenged the tradition...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

Constitutional and Administrative Law

When examining the decision of previous court comments that are made obiter dicta will not be part of the precedent since often obiter dicta comments are speculative remarks on how the judge might have acted if the facts had been different.

Binding precedents come from earlier case law and, as suggested in the wording, must be followed even if the judge in the present case does not agree with the legal reasoning of the judge in the earlier case. In order for a precedent to be binding the facts of the present case to have to be sufficiently similar to the earlier case. Decisions given in a lower court to the one in which the present case is being heard will not be binding. For a decision to set a precedent it must have b...
8 Pages(2000 words)Assignment

Analysis of OReilly v Mackman Case

Judicial review is a concept which is constitutionally undecided as it on one side, it shores up the rule of law, democracy, and pre-eminence of parliament by facilitating the courts to check the boundaries of government authority and on another side, the courts are open to the decision on the plants based on the fact of separation of authorities that are intimating with the verdicts of democratically elected institutions. Judicial review is not apprehended with the virtues of government assessment but deals with whether the deciding authority has remained within the legal boundaries and whether broad principles of rationality and fairness adhere. The constitutional basis of judicial review is debated as one view holds that it is...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

The Law on Physical Punishment of Children Fails to give Sufficient Respect to Childrens Rights

Under the English criminal law, several past and current legislations were made in order to protect the children from corporal punishment or becoming a victim of physical abuse. Despite our effort to prevent parents from using physical force in disciplining their children, the British Government remains unconvinced that the law which protects the children from physical punishment is sufficient (Keating, 2008). Physical punishment such as ‘smacking’, ‘slapping’, ‘kicking’, or ‘spanking’ is referring to the act of causing a degree of pain or discomfort to the child. (Niland, 2009, p. 6) With regard to the legal issues behind child protection against physical abuse, this study aims to d...
6 Pages(1500 words)Coursework

Analysis of Tourism and Hospitality Law Case

 The main issue that needs to be tackled first is whether there is a valid contract between Richard Brat, carrying on trade as Brighton Greens, (buyer) and Molly and Kelly trading in First Grade Granny Smith apples as Holy Farm.

Apparently, there was, when considering their verbal and written mail sent by Richard to Holy Farm on August 1 reading as follows –“Please deliver 20 boxes –Granny Smith ‘Brighton Greens’. Cheque mailed.“

It may be seen that the mail order does not specify the category or grade of apples to be supplied, but one of the implied conditions of sale could be that the goods ordered need to correspond with the goods inspected and tested.

In th...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Organisation law case study for FREE!

Contact Us