Nobody downloaded yet

Brief Memorandum to the Justice with Regard to the Case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger - Term Paper Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Summary
This memorandum is aimed at providing sufficient arguments as pertains to how Justice Roberts will rule in this case. The facts of the case will be delineated since they serve as a baseline from which arguments will be given. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.7% of users find it useful
Brief Memorandum to the Justice with Regard to the Case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Brief Memorandum to the Justice with Regard to the Case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger"

Download file to see previous pages A decision will be made as to how Justice Robert’s will rule in this case. The answer given will be based on the knowledge we have concerning the work experience and beliefs of Justice Robert’s background. The experience and legal work of Justice Robert will also be reviewed in the process in bid to affirm why we believe that he will vote in a certain way as pertains to the case of discussion. In bid to garner an in depth understanding of Justice Roberts rulings and the bearing his experience will have on the case in question, prior Supreme Cases that he has ruled as pertains to equal protection will also be reviewed. Statement of Case Facts The facts of the case involve Arnold Schwarzenegger who is the official County Governor of California and Perry who represents a lesbian couple that has been denied marriage licenses on the basis of Proposition 8. The plaintiffs have adopted four children and they would like to get married so the children can be accorded benefits accorded to other children of heterosexual couples. The plaintiffs challenge Proposition 8 which was voter enacted on November 2008 hence amending the California Constitution. Proposition 8 asserts that California will only recognize marriage between a man and a woman. The plaintiffs litigation is based on the notion that proposition 8 denied them due process and equal protection which is divergent to the Fourteenth Amendment hence the defendants violate2. With this genesis, this paper will be aimed at writing a memorandum as to how Justice Roberts should rule in the case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger. The propositions in this paper will be anchored on reviewing Justice Roberts’ work experience, beliefs and previous rulings on equal protection to aid in giving an opinion of how he will rule in this case. Consequently, decision making theories of the judicial system will also be reviewed in the process and reference made to the case and how we expect Justice Robert to rule on this particular case. Argument Background information on Justice Roberts: work experience and beliefs Justice John G. Roberts was born in 1955 in Buffalo New York and in a religious conservative family. Just like his family, Justice John Roberts was and is still a strong Catholic who lives in belief of the Catholic ordinances. Justice John Roberts is a very outspoken icon in the American Justice system considering his repeated appointment into higher offices of the American Law. Justice John Roberts is remembered as a very close legal intimate of George W Bush after having received Presidential nomination to the US Supreme Court and in the position of Chief Justice in 2005. Justice John Roberts is also known for his attempts to reverse the proposals and Supreme Court’s approval of separation of the church from the state. I8in addition, Justice Roberts is demonstrated as one of the American legal practitioners who respect the American Constitution and would always live to protect and uphold it alongside any Federal approved jurisdictions. President George W. Bush had no support for homosexual marriage holding that heterosexuality was God’s wish for human being and had to be codified full in one way or the other (WND). Considering the relationship between Justice John Roberts and the former US President, one can predict the likely stand and ruling of Justice John Roberts on issues concerning homosexuality. For Justice Roberts to qualify for the office nomination by President Bush, it meant that they had a lot in common and that Bush had great obsession on Robert’s interpretation of the law. It can also be argued that Chief Justice of nay state acts as one of the eminent personalities who can advice the president on the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Brief Memorandum to the Justice with Regard to the Case of Perry v Term Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1395694-write-a-brief-memorandum-to-the-justice
(Brief Memorandum to the Justice With Regard to the Case of Perry V Term Paper)
https://studentshare.org/law/1395694-write-a-brief-memorandum-to-the-justice.
“Brief Memorandum to the Justice With Regard to the Case of Perry V Term Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1395694-write-a-brief-memorandum-to-the-justice.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
mw
mwehner added comment 11 months ago
Student rated this paper as
Good paper! Used it to complete an assignment for a law course. It was easy as ABC, for the first time in my life.

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Brief Memorandum to the Justice with Regard to the Case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger

Perry v. New Hampshire

...crime with the actual perpetuator. However, regarding this, Perry could potentially find another case source and that would be the case of Simmons v. United States, 390 US 377, 384 (1968). He could potentially expound this leading to proving that eyewitnesses or even the accomplice the possibility of being made under suggestive circumstances. Criminal liability refers to the responsibility of an act to harm the society which could be prosecuted by the government. The case of Perry is subject of government’s prosecution. However, the government did not eliminate his right to amend the initial verdict and so the Supreme...
3 Pages(750 words)Term Paper

Case Brief : Terry v. Ohio

...? Case Brief: Terry v. Ohio of the of the For many years now, Police in the United s have engaged in investigative practices which are commonly known as ‘Stop and Frisk’. This process normally involves the stopping of a person or vehicle with the purpose of interrogation or a brief investigation. This process is sometimes accompanied by a ‘pat down’ search of the outer clothing or apparel of the suspect, done with a view to ensure that the person is unarmed. While this mechanism is common place in today’s high risk world, its validity juxtaposed to the Fourth Amendment was examined by the Hon’ble United States Supreme Court in the case of Terry...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Case Brief: Wyeth v. Levine

...? Case Brief: Wyeth v. Levine Table of Contents I. Facts 3 II. Issue 4 III. Decision 4 IV. Reasons 5 References 8 I. Facts Wyeth markets the drug Phenergan, the generic name of which is promethazine hydrochloride, which is indicated for nausea, as an antihistamine medication. In its injectable form, it can be administered either as a drip, known as an IV-drip, or as a vein-injectable, in a procedure known as an IV-push. It is known that Phenergan can cause gangrene when it is able to get into the artery of a patient, because of its corrosive nature. Such is the case with the plaintiff Levine in this case, whose right hand and later the whole forearm was...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Justice Opinion on Hollingsworth v. Perry

...Justice Opinion on Hollingsworth v. Perry Overview The Perry v. Schwarzenegger, now recognized as Hollingsworth v. Perry, is a case that became filed by attorneys David Boies and Ted Olson on behalf of two homosexual couples; raising a preliminary order hindering proposition 8 (Rosky 943). The case emanates from the legislation, Proposition 8 that became passed in the year 2008 by the ballot criterion in the state of California. Facts: presently, California State has altered its constitution to describe marriage as an association between one woman and one man. In the...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Terry v. Ohio Case Brief

...?Terry v. Ohio Case Brief The short of Terry v. Ohio can be explained as the U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the 4th amendment prohibition pertaining to unreasonable search and seizures. The decision of the court states that the 4th Amendment right is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect in the street and proceeds to frisk him even though there is no visible probably cause to arrest the person. Rather, the act of the police officer is done upon his or her suspicion that a crime may be undertaken because of a sense or reasonable belief that the person in question may be armed and presently dangerous. This was the decision that the courts reached when...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Perry Rose Case Study

...? Perry Rose Case Study Introduction Corporate, individual and financial specialist analyst conducts various computations to determine whether a particular project should be determined. This study provide a case of Perry Rose Ltd that is utilize to determine whether the company was making sound decisions as well as giving recommendations based on the computations. The incremental cash flows, pay back periods and project present values will be computed to determine the anticipated cash flow to be received by undertaking the project. This will help to evaluate the performance of the company as well as determine measures that may be adopted to improve performance of the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Case Brief - McGurn v Bell

...Case Brief RE: McGurn v. Bell Microproducts, Inc. Facts George McGurn met with the president of the Bell microproducts who gave the position of the company. At that meeting, gave a condition that for him to take the employment offer by Bell, he should be issued with a contract in the written form inclusive a termination clause specifying that in case his contract was terminated he will be given half his commissions plus six months’ salary. Following several discussions with an official from Bell, Bell issued him with a contract devoid of the termination clause which he rejected. During one of these discussions, McGurn said that a termination clause covering his initial...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Case Brief U.S v. Hinkley

...Case Brief U.S Vs Hinkley Facts On March 30, 1981, a man d John W. Hinckley Junior shot the then US President Ronald Reagan in an attempt to assassinate him. During the process, he hit and wounded four people who were present on the scene: President Reagan, the Presidential Press Secretary, a Secret Service Agent and a Metropolitan Police Officer. Hickley was immediately arrested and subsequently faced trial for prosecution in the Legal Court of the Columbia district of the USA. Hinckley’s lawyers argued that he was suffering from schizophrenia and his actions were a result of his impaired mind. The defense attorneys also presented medical evidence in the Court which supported their claim. On July 21,...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Case Brief: J.D.B v. North Carolina

...Case Brief: J.D.B v. North Carolina Procedural History The case of J.D.B. v. North Carolina was decided by the Supreme Court of North Carolina. It was appealed up to the Supreme Court of North Carolina from the trial court to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, and finally to the State Supreme Court. Facts Relevant facts to the case having a bearing on the final verdict of the court included whether investigator, DiCostanzo’s taking J.D.B. to the conference room of the school for questioning constituted custodial arrangement of questioning, wherein the accused was not provided Miranda alerts, and that he was forced to make and sign the...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Brief memorandum

...-defence is provided for in most national criminal codes and constitutes a rule in customary international law. Duress is seen as an excuse except in cases where one has to choose between two evils then it is regarded as justification (Elies 3). Article 31(1)(c) of the Rome Statute, contains self-defence as a ground for excluding criminal responsibility where the person was acting reasonably to defend himself, herself or property essential for survival, or for accomplishing a military mission in case of war crimes from an impending threat. The use of force should be reasonable. Duress operates as a general defence that is applicable to all crimes except murder as was established in R...
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Brief Memorandum to the Justice with Regard to the Case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger for FREE!

Contact Us