StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Case of Mohamad vs Rajoub - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The case of Mohamad vs Rajoub was filed in the supreme court of AMERICA in the year 2011. The case was regarding the issue whether the Torture victim Protection Act 1991 permitted the action against the defendants who are not classified as natural persons. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.2% of users find it useful
Case of Mohamad vs Rajoub
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Case of Mohamad vs Rajoub"

Download file to see previous pages It is evident from the study that the case of Mohamad vs Rajoub was filed by the widow and children of Azzam Rahim , who was tortured brutally and murdered inside the custody of a Palestinian jail by the officials However the court dismissed the case filed by the accused family on the grounds that that the Torture victim protection act applies only to the natural persons which was later supported by the Supreme of the United States. Though the respondents in the case which included the three officers accepted their guilt but the court provided the decision on their favor considering the fact that Azzam Rahim was not a natural person. The case of Mohammad vs Rajoub was filed in the court with a purpose to investigate the fact that whether Torture victim Protection Act 1991was also applicable only to the natural persons or not. The case was under the jurisdiction of the district court of Colombia though it was later handled by the US Supreme Court. In the case the source of the criminal was law comprised of the families of the victim and the three officials of the custody. Accomplice liability in legal term refers to the fact that an individual is held guilty for the commitment of the crime by other if the person intentionally is involved in the crime by his solicitation, or advice to commit the crime with the help of the physical conduct or his psychological influence. In the case referred the victim who was in custody was brutally beaten by the officials who caused him death. The three officers who were held as guilty were charged with the Accomplice liability considering the fact that all three were involved in the killing and must have provoked each other in beating the victim in custody which caused him death. It also conferred on the fact that the accomplice had the stake in the act of the principal. As in the case it was difficult to point out the principle accused as all three were equally responsible, so the accused were held guilty under the charge of accomplice liability (Rogers, n.d, p.1351). Criminal liability refers to the liability of the accused which arises on the event of breaking the law or committing a crime. In the case mentioned the respondents were held guilty and charged with criminal liability on the grounds that they violated the law and killed the convict in the prison. As a result of the offence they committed, they were sentenced to jail for 1-7 years, but they were not imposed with any other liability considering the fact that the victim was not a natural person. During the petition in the court the officials also accepted their act of violating the law of killing a person in jail. Difference between various elements of crime and the application in the case: The elements of crime which are considered in the paper are Actus Reus, Actus Menus and concurrence. In legal terms the, Actus Reus refers to the conduct of the accused and in order to declare the accused as criminal it is necessary to investigate the reason behind the act which causes the harm to the victim and the act must be a voluntary in nature . In the case of Mohammad vs Rajoub, it was found out that the officials in the custody had ...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Case of Mohamad vs Rajoub Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1395273-criminal-law
(Case of Mohamad Vs Rajoub Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1395273-criminal-law.
“Case of Mohamad Vs Rajoub Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1395273-criminal-law.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Case of Mohamad vs Rajoub

Symbolic vs. Functional Recruitment: Wendys

There is social inequality in India, a difference like lack of teamwork, managers like working individually unlike the Americans, the Indians give priority to culture and family over work while for the Americans work takes precedence. Both are risk-takers and developing personal relations is important for the American while it isn’t for the Indians. Such differences can make it difficult for them to work together.
The next part of the report focuses on expatriation and repatriation. The national culture might make it difficult for the expatriates to adjust unless laws and regulations are established to initiate an effort to encourage better-coordinated work between the two. The expatriates might feel insecure about thei...
16 Pages (4000 words) Assignment

America Vs Let America be America

His poem “Let America be America”
When Claude McKay was just twenty years old, he published his first book of verses titled “Songs of Jamaica” which dealt with his impressions of Black life in America. He wrote on various subjects that included love and romance using very passionate language. Later on, the main themes he wrote on, time and again was about the sufferings and injustice meted out to the blacks in America. In the earlier part of the twentieth century, his literary achievements had a great influence on the Harlem Renaissance. He was greatly respected by the younger generation
Langston Hughes completed his college education at Lincoln University, Pennsylvania. It was at Lincoln, Illinoi...
7 Pages (1750 words) Book Report/Review

Analysis of Trust Law Case

Once the court is satisfied that the “declarant had the requisite intention it will strive to validate it.”3 Certainty of intention will therefore be the most important element for determining whether or not the letter constitutes an enforcable trust.

Assuming that the trust held by the trustees under the father’s will trust in favor of Sally and the trust agreement in respect of the horse are valid trusts the question of cetainties are not valid except to the extent that a new trust is created in favor of Sally’s children and thereby extinguishing the previous trusts. This is particularly so with respect to the will trust. The trust agreement over the horse only involves the disposition of a ben...
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework

Analysis of the Case of Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheepbreeders Association Ltd

There were several basic legal provisions that gave direction to the formation of a company in the United Kingdom. It has its original foundation in 1844 when the Joint Stock Companies Act1 1844 was formulated. It has given regulations for facilitating the formation of companies by "deed of settlement". Gradually, the shareholder concept was initiated in 1855 by the general incorporation procedure in the name of Limited Liability Act2 1855. This has offered limited liability to shareholders and provided identification to the company as a separate legal persona. The doctrine of limited liability postulates that a company shall be liable for the debts that it incurs, and even if it undergoes closure for any grounds, creditors cannot...
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Operating in India: The Case of Exceed Corporation

On the other hand, it would be required that the firms interested to operate globally can meet the demands of the market in which they plan to enter.

In the case of India, the operation of foreign firms across the country is related to a series of problems. More specifically, private – driven commercial activities cannot be expanded further from a pre-defined framework: there are commercial activities in the country that belong to the exclusive administration of the government and they are conducted by state-owned enterprises. India is a country of low income (referring to the income of the vast majority of its population which is estimated to be approximately 1,165,577,000 in accordance with a recent report publishe...
18 Pages (4500 words) Case Study

The Case of R v Turnbull

The defendants planned to rob a bank’s customer deposits in the bank’s safe by posting a notice diverting the dropbox to another location, which they planned to burgle. Several customers did, in fact, drop their wallets loaded with money into the dropbox, however, one customer was suspicious and alerted the police. The strength of the prosecution’s case rested on the visual recognition provided by a police constable who clearly saw one of the defendants removing a sign from the bank premises and recognized him. On this basis, the court of appeal concluded that the appeal of the defendants could not stand. It was held that if visual identification had been the only evidence, the outcome would not have been definit...
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

Cultural Value Orientations: German vs. Turkish

When organizational culture is discussed in the context of national culture, it is based on certain assumptions. According to Schein (2004 qt. Browaeys and Price 2008) culture can be defined as:

"...a set of basic assumptions - shared solutions to universal problems of external adaptation (how to survive) and internal integration (how to stay together) - which have evolved over time and are handed down from one generation to the next".

External adaptation here refers to factors or culture which the management can control while internal integration means the relationship which binds them to the group. In this context management styles and approaches are often influenced by the cultural value orientation - that...
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

The British Constitution vs The Human Rights Act 1998

This research essay analyses the above statement and arrives at a conclusion.
Integration of the provisions of ECHR into U.K’s domestic law by way of HRA 1998 can be regarded as revolutionary as it facilitates the majority of the ECHR rights provisions directly applicable in the U.K. Before that integration, a U.K Court has to presume that when there is a clash between U.K’s domestic law and ECHR rights provision, the ECHR rights provision will always prevail. This principle has been laid down in R v Secretary of Home Dept ex parte Brind1 and R v Secretary of Home Dept ex parte Thakrar. 2
Courts have now the power to declare any statue which they find incompatible with ECHR provisions and order for fine-tunin...
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Analysis of OReilly v Mackman Case

Judicial review is a concept which is constitutionally undecided as it on one side, it shores up the rule of law, democracy, and pre-eminence of parliament by facilitating the courts to check the boundaries of government authority and on another side, the courts are open to the decision on the plants based on the fact of separation of authorities that are intimating with the verdicts of democratically elected institutions. Judicial review is not apprehended with the virtues of government assessment but deals with whether the deciding authority has remained within the legal boundaries and whether broad principles of rationality and fairness adhere. The constitutional basis of judicial review is debated as one view holds that it is...
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Analysis of Tourism and Hospitality Law Case

 The main issue that needs to be tackled first is whether there is a valid contract between Richard Brat, carrying on trade as Brighton Greens, (buyer) and Molly and Kelly trading in First Grade Granny Smith apples as Holy Farm.

Apparently, there was, when considering their verbal and written mail sent by Richard to Holy Farm on August 1 reading as follows –“Please deliver 20 boxes –Granny Smith ‘Brighton Greens’. Cheque mailed.“

It may be seen that the mail order does not specify the category or grade of apples to be supplied, but one of the implied conditions of sale could be that the goods ordered need to correspond with the goods inspected and tested.

In th...
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Case of Mohamad vs Rajoub for FREE!

Contact Us