Nobody downloaded yet

EU Law - Coursework Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
EU Law Question 1 (A). The doctrines of indirect effect and horizontal direct effect inform whether or not the residents and gardeners may rely on the Directive 2008/01 in claims against both the government and Fattenem despite the fact that it has not been implemented…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.3% of users find it useful
EU Law
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "EU Law"

Download file to see previous pages It was held in Marshall v Southampton and South West Hampshire Health Authority that an anti-discrimination Directive that had not been implemented by the UK despite the expiration of time for doing so, could not be used against private parties. The ECJ’s decision was based on the rationale that Article 249 of the EC Treaty specifically stated that Directives were binding on the states to which they were addressed.3 The only real possibility for pursuing claims against private parties in cases where damages are sustained and claim would have arisen under an unimplemented directive is in cases where the private individual is under the control of the state, subject to some form of statutory control or provides a public service.4 Fattenem appears to be a private corporate body offering private services and thus cannot be characterized as an agent of the state. There are other possibilities for the residents and the gardener to pursue claims against Fattenem with respect to the unimplemented Directive. The doctrine of indirect effect as enunciated in Francovitch v Italian Republic [1992] IRLR 84. In the Francovitch case, the Italian government’s failure to implement a Directive seeking to ensure that employees receive fair compensation when their employers became insolvent resulted in employees losing out on compensation. The court ruled that Italy’s failure to implement the Directive was a breach of its obligation to ensure that the result intended to be achieved was ensured. Thus Italy was liable to compensate the employees.5 Based on the doctrine of indirect effect as enunciated in Francovitch, the residents and gardeners can thus pursue Fattenem for damages relative to the unimplemented Directive. Based on the ruling in Francovitch, the right to take action indirectly is substantiated if it can be established that the damages complained of is exactly the result that the Directive intended to prevent. The Direction was clearly intended to prevent water pollution and the government’s failure to implement the Directive resulted in significant water pollution and damages. Essentially, the Francovitch decision established that individuals may pursue claims against the state in respect of damages sustained as a result of the government’s failure to implement a Directive if three conditions were satisfied.6 First, it must be established that the Directive must transfer some right to the individual complainants. Arguably, the Directive conferred upon the individuals a right to clean and unpolluted water. Secondly, the rights must be discernible from the wording of the Directive. The Directive clearly intended to prevent contamination of water in the areas of waste disposal by those who manufactured fertilisers. Thirdly, there must be a link between the government’s failure to implement the Directive and the corresponding damages complained of. The evidence suggest that the government’s failure to implement the Directive resulted in Fattenem’s progressive and unrestrained use of chemicals. The residents had not complained of pollution and contamination before. Thus had the Directive been implemented Fattenem would not have continued to increase its use of the chemical to dangerous levels. Essentially, the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“EU Law Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1393707-eu-law
(EU Law Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1393707-eu-law.
“EU Law Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1393707-eu-law.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF EU Law

EU law

...?EU law Introduction Article 189 of Treaty of Rome provides for a directive of the European Union to be binding on Member s with flexibility have their legal text of their transposition according to their national peculiarities. In other words it can be so worded so as to be compatible with their national legislation. The aim of a directive is achieve the substance rather than the form. Thus, Member States are free to achieve the end-result required by a directive in suitably incorporating in their national laws.1 Case discussion with relevant legal principles Although the employer has allowed rest period 10 minutes as permitted in Estate Facilitators Act 1965 as against 15 minutes...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

EU Law

...prohibiting fur farming and restricting the entry of fur products in its territory is indeed a hindrance to competition. It is clear that its intention is to impede, prevent or reduce patronage of products source from other Member States which is contrary to the EU’s objective of a single and integrated market. This would promote locally produce products giving it undue economic advantage. Thus, the act of Sagoland falls within the prohibition of Article 34 TFEU. II. Measures of another Member State to protect the health and life of the animals found in the other Member State cannot be justified under Article 36 TFEU. National law of Sagoland intended to protect the life and health of animals found...
20 Pages(5000 words)Essay

EU law

...? EU LAW –AN ANALYSIS Problem A In European Union, the most important legislative instruments are regulations and directives. A regulation is a general rule that is obligating upon member nations in whole and is directly applicable to all member states. Obligating in whole connotes that the member states has no preference as to method and form. On the other hand, directives are general rule, but they are binding as to their result. For each member state, it is expected, a directive is obligating as to the outcome to be accomplished. As to the choice to method and form, the institutions of the member states can exercise their power. There is less clarity about their direct impact due to the wider policy...
11 Pages(2750 words)Assignment

EU law

...EU LAW Summary The paper provides the meanings of the direct and indirect effect of EU law at national level. It additionally describes the legal instruments that are affected by the above two and the conditions that have to be satisfied in order to ensure their effects are felt within the legal system. Finally, the paper provides a description of the actions that can be taken against the member countries of the European Union in ensuring that they do not breach the union’s laws. Introduction Businesses and individuals have been offered a variety of mechanisms and laws for ensuring that their rights are respected at their nation’s level....
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

EU LAW

...the union has a directive on the right of the citizens of the union to move freely within the member states, Antoine has full right to exercise his right to be employed by the restaurant in London. All these parties after their rights have been infringed by the decision of the national authority as for Claude and Marie, and by fellow citizens as for Antoine, they have to seek redress first by appealing through the means provided by its national legislation. The EU law on free movement of workers can be invoked in national proceedings before the national authorities and courts. In a related scenario, Case C-434/09 McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ms McCarthy, a citizen of the United...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

EU LAW

...to put profit gain before service to the public; hence the imperatives of the free market do not directly affect them. II. Health safeguards in the I.T workforce A. First Scenario Assuming that an EU regulation provides for a 5-minute break of employees working with computers at two hour intervals throughout the working day; however, UK laws lack such provision. The area of interest now would be the rights of an employer against an employee, after she developed migraine attacks resulting from her constant use of computer, as required from her job. The Van Gend en Loos vs. Neatherland2 2established dual vigilance used to enforce the directives of the European law with every Member State....
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

EU Law

...?EU Law: Katisa and Elijah The main issues for Katisa and Elijah are the free movement of goods, services and people within the single market of the EU and EU law relating to the direct effect of the Directive. Katisa’s issues falls more broadly within the EU’s general prohibition against quantitative restrictions in support of a single market.1 As Kennedy argues, the free movement of goods is “one of the principle features of the EU.”2 The law relating to quantitative restrictions is contained in Articles 34-36 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TEFU), formerly 28-30. Article...
3 Pages(750 words)Coursework

EU Law

...other commercial organisation importing clementines. The applicant could not show that it was specifically discriminated against. However, in Cordorniu although the Court of Justice held that the Regulation was generally applicable the applicant was successful as it was able to show an infringement of its trade mark rights which the Regulation would have overridden. Therefore it is submitted that in view of the fact that the Regulation is generalised in its application and that neither party can show direct discrimination, their application(s) must fail. Bibliography Craig, P and De Burca G, (2002), EU Law, Text, Cases and Materials, OUP Charles and Dilshad: Case-C188/89 A Foster and Others v...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Eu law

...Analysis of the case Kolpinghuis Nijmegen BV 80/86 (European Court of Justice) Question The facts of the particular case can be summarized as following: In Netherlands, the delivery of a beverage called ‘mineral water’ has been considered as breaching the national law (the article 2 of the country’s inspection regulation). The reason is that the above beverage is consisted of tap water and carbon dioxide. For this reason its delivery can be prohibited in accordance with the above mentioned national regulation where it is stated that the relevant authority has the power to prohibit the ‘stocking for sale and delivery of goods intended for trade and human consumption which are of unsound composition’. Question 2 The case commenced... this...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

EU law

...EUROPEAN UNION LAWS Question Under the European Union (EU) laws, a directive is an instrument, directing its Member Countries to perform wholly, the instructions mentioned in the said Directive and this shall be binding and mandatory on such Member States. Directives issued by EU need to be enforced by Member countries; there are seemingly no escapes, however, its modalities and modus operandi are subject matters to be decided by its National Courts and law makers. Norms of enforcement: However, what is important is that directives cannot be ignored, brushed aside or partially enforced by Member States, nor any compromises made on its practical...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Coursework on topic EU Law for FREE!

Contact Us