Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (F.I.S.A.) court - Term Paper Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
The paper would submit the author’s own perspective of how things affecting national security should be categorized by law and are FISA laws of current stature morally and internationally acceptable as the legal procedure to enact US defense…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.1% of users find it useful
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (F.I.S.A.) court
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (F.I.S.A.) court"

Download file to see previous pages The particulars of such actions were in effect up until the early 1970s and it was the ‘Keith’ case that predominantly broke the shackles to such unfair means. In 1972 the Keith case was one of the major turnarounds that led to the development of FISA courts in the country. Technically speaking this particular legal case was between the United States’ government and a United States district court. The district court emphasized that an acting attorney general gave specific directive permission to carry out electronic wireless intelligence without a warrant on a US citizen accused of bombing a Central Intelligence Agency building. The Supreme Court firmly rejected the US government’s petition of claiming foreign intelligence on the per se warrant requirement but the court emphasized that according to the legislative structure and constituting to the fourth amendment it is uniquely prohibited to use of warrantless surveillance particularly directed at domestic threats to U.S. national security. The court however did not reach a general consensus on whether it is appropriate to target warrantless surveillance on foreign individuals and agents pertaining to other agencies but opened up a new line of thought for the executive council suggesting that it may be up to the latter body if and how they would significantly indulge in matters related to the mentioned entities and personnel. The Supreme Court however demanded that the congress issue a revised plan for a fool proof constitutional amendment that would ensure as a constitutional element for future electronic wireless surveillance of threats regarding the national security of the United States. Another event...
The paper tells that there are several fundamental aspects of the FISA warrants and it solely addresses to two particular fractions of people that may pose a potential threat to the national security of the United States. Firstly warrants are foremost issued to personnel that are categorized as a foreign power. Places or entities that succumb to such definitions may potentially include a foreign government, a diplomat; other representative or employee of a foreign government, a fraction of a foreign nation that is not substantially composed of US persons, an entity openly acknowledged by a foreign government to be directed and controlled by it, or a group engaged in international terrorism or activities in preparation therefore. The second defining figure that a FISA warrant can be issued to, are agents of foreign powers. These may fundamentally include any individual who is not a US person and works for a foreign power inside the united states or an individual who again may not be a US person but engaged in espionage intelligence gathering activities running from within any associated foreign power. However the FISA constitution does also recognize US citizen as also potential National security threats and a FISA warrant can be issued if for some reason they may be suspected with substantial defying evidence of engaging into espionage pertaining to compromising the national security of the United States or involved in clandestine intelligence gathering activities for a foreign power which activities constitute a violation of U.S. criminal statutes. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (F.I.S.A.) court Term Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved de
(Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (F.I.S.A.) Court Term Paper)
“Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (F.I.S.A.) Court Term Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
zachariah35 added comment 1 year ago
Student rated this paper as
Great work done on the "Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (F.I.S.A.) court". I think it is the best document I have seen so far.

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (F.I.S.A.) court

Domestic and Foreign Intelligence Services

...contributed to its overall effectiveness (Burch, 2007). Information sharing in United States intelligence service has been hampered due to the existence of interagency rivalry between CIA and FBI. Foreign Intelligence The secret Intelligence Service or MI-6 is the agency charged with the role of supplying the British government with foreign intelligence. MI-6 roles and operations include the gathering of information across the globe that has the likelihood of impacting political and economic interests in United Kingdom. The major focus of MI-6 includes terrorism,...
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper

Foreign Intelligence Organization

...threat posed by Russia. The photoreconnaissance satellites have improved Russia’s operational capabilities. They enable quicker return of intelligence information. In their effort to improve their global economic, political and social matters, Russia is likely to continue to gather U.S. intelligence concerning its military capabilities and technologies, and foreign policy initiatives. Therefore, Russia remains the greatest threat to U.S intelligence with regard to its immense space-borne capability of collecting intelligence, as opposed to the other six countries. Bibliography Bazan, Elizabeth. The Foreign Intelligence...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act protect the United States against potential or actual attack and/or sabotage or acts of international terrorism. Under FISA was also established the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, a special U.S. Federal court that holds nonpublic hearings in order to issue search warrants under FISA. Proceedings before the FISC are ex parte, implying that the government is the only part present. However, in the year 2001, an important Amendment was made to the Act under the USA PATRIOT Act in order to encompass terrorist groups who don’t work on behalf of any foreign...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Surveillance and intelligence

...generation is simply unaware of what is unfolding around them or do not simply care. He also observes how the government has held the young generation at ransom, through its spending, investments, entitlements, and poverty alleviation schemes that only favor the older generation since the 1960’s at the expense of the young generation’s financial wellbeing in future (Friedman Friedman points out that, such actions would prove to be a great burden to the young generation in future ( He further tries to warn the young American generation about old generation personalities like Geoffrey Canada and DruckenMiller. In his article, he shows how such people are focused on maintaining the old financial...
4 Pages(1000 words)Term Paper

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

.../1997/spring-bos/johnson.html>. Kim, Suk H., and Sam Barone. "Is the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 a Success or Failure A Survey of Members of the Academy of International Business." Journal of International Business Studies 12.3 (1981): 123-26. JSTOR. 21 June 2007. Seitzinger, Michael V. "Foreign Corrupt Practices Act." CRS Report to Congress. 3 Mar. 1999. Congressional Research Service. 21 June 2007 . Shaheen, Frederick F., and Natalia W. Geren. "Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement Trends." Briefing Papers (2005): 1-16. 21 June 2007 .... FCPA Paper For the last century the US government has made efforts to curtail and eliminate corrupt businesspractices. The anti-trust legislation of the early 20th century was one of the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

...Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 20 AUG FCPA PAPER The increased number of corruption scandals during the early 1970s led to the enactment of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977. FCPA is a United States Federal Law and prohibits the bribery of foreign officials by U.S. citizens, U.S. companies or any person residing in the U.S. It bans the offering of money or anything that might be valuable to a foreign official, in return for granting the permission to start or retain a business. According to the rules of FCPA it is mandatory for all the U.S. companies (local as well as foreign companies) to keep an up to date record of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

U.S.A. PATRIOT Act, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and the Future of Domestic Intelligence

...and facilitating repatriation of stolen assets to the citizens of the countries to whom those assets belong (USA PATRIOT Act, 2012). Amendments have been made in the patriot act when there was growing concern among several members of the Senate regarding its protection of civil liberties. On February 10, 2006, the USA Patriot Act Additional Reauthorizing Amendments Act of 2006, S.2271 was being introduced in the Senate. It amends the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and five federal statutes conjectured on the provision of the national security letter (NSL) authority to the federal...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Future of the Court POLS640.F.8

... an opinion. In conclusion, a Supreme Court Judge is usually nominated by the president of the state. The president considers various qualities when making the nominations. He or she looks at the nominee’s record of public service, the career in law, and the judicial philosophy. However, appoint a justice for life leads to a well experienced and effective justice when it comes to decision making in the Supreme Court. Works cited Gibson S. Larry and Marshall Thurgood. Young Thurgood: The Making of a Supreme Court Justice. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2012. Print. Kommers et al. American Constitutional Law: Essays, Cases, and Comparative Notes. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2009. Print.... Future of the Court...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

.... This surveillance, according to the Act, may or may not substantiate to anything feasible5. It is the Attorney General’s responsibility to create a certification of the conditions necessary for the surveillance. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court authorizes this certification by its seal. The A.G is then supposed to report to both the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on their compliance6. This provision further limits the use of warrantless surveillance on any group despite their accusations and...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

...of such motions before the trial or hearing of the proceedings related to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act will alter the course of the hearings and possibly instigate special investigations into the matter. Only when there was no opportunity for releasing such motions would they be considered later on, in an attempt to reverse a rather harsh ruling. Whenever the Attorney General swears by oath and signs an affidavit that pursuance of electronic surveillance or other related materials leading to the disclosure or an adversary hearing such information might harm the national security of the United States, the court might curtail...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (F.I.S.A.) court for FREE!

Contact Us