Case study 9B - Assignment Example

Micro issues I believe it does solve the problem in a certain way for at least the source and the of the content are mentioned. Problems associated with professional ethics are always the most difficult to address and solve. In addition to just citing the source properly, the use of content by aggregators should be also qualified as fair, which means that the use is not commercial in nature, the work is informational or factual, the quality and quantity of reproduction in relation to the entire work, and the effect of the use.

If the requirements are met and everyone’s interests are considered, the problem is automatically solved. 2. That may eliminate ethical issues due to the fact that the nature of the use of work changes. In fact, it also depends on the conditions under which the rights for publication are transferred.Midrange issues1. The first word that attracts attention in the statement is “digging up”. The ways to “sig up” the information can be different and not always ethical. Also, persuasiveness of delivering the news the way it is put in the statement strikes the eye as well.

The matter is that while some interpret the statement as it is, others may find implications there and use them for their own benefit and to the damage of others. Sometimes the desire to be persuasive while delivering information results in extensive appeal to reader’s emotions, which can lead to the distortion of the information perception. In this case, an aggregator may act as a watchdog over the information; however, this means that it performs tasks uncharacteristic of it, meaning it will act like a critic rather than content placer.2. The main difference here is the fact that the Associated Press licenses the content and then sell it to the authorized parties, which means the work is paid for.

The Huffington Post, in its turn, simply rewrites the content and buries links using quite an aggressive approach to news aggregation.Macro issues1. Despite the fact that today many people tend to speak about the ethical side of the problem, for example, the infringement of a copyright, for the long-standing cooperatives, such as the Associated Press, the issue is mostly of economic nature. The matter is that because of news aggregation, such cooperatives lose significant sums of money while aggregators, such as the Huffington Post or Google News, profit from the information other gathered at great cost.

If the aggregators paid for content, that might eliminate the ethical side other problem; at the same time, other problems might appear, mostly those associated with the changed character of such projects.2. News is everywhere and is free; in fact, no one owns the news. It is rather the medium is owned by certain companies. The media outlet has the right to require that a consumer pay not for the information but for the means of its delivery, such as the medium itself as well as the work of people that facilitate news delivery.