Nobody downloaded yet

Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium v FCC, 518 U.S. 727 United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 U.S - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Subject: Case Review The case number 95-124, Denver Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc., et al., Appellants, vs. Federal Communications Commission et al., Appellee, was argued from February 21, 1996 and decided on June 28, 1996…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.8% of users find it useful
Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium v FCC, 518 U.S. 727 United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 U.S
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium v FCC, 518 U.S. 727 United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 U.S"

Download file to see previous pages In this Act, section 10 (a) and (c) allowed television program operator to forbid or deny broadcasting a program that it practically trusts portrays sexual activities or organs in a patently offensive way. On the other hand, section 10 (b) required the operators to distinguish a “patently belligerent” programming, block it and unblock it within 30 days of the viewer’s request (Breyer et al. 1). The appeal’s court held that the three sections were coherent with the First Amendment. The ruling was acknowledged in part and reversed in part. The court issued the opinion resolving that § 10(b) infringes the first modification. The sections’ “distinguish and block” requisites have understandable language obstructive upshots for subscribers, who cannot view telecasts distinguished on the “patently belligerent” channel devoid of significant prior planning. Additionally, the judge held that section 10 (b) was not properly designed to attain its primary goal of protecting the children from disclosure to “patently offensive” telecasts (Breyer et al. 1). The case number 98-1682, United States, et al., the Appellants, vs. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc., the Defendant, was argued from November 30, 1999 and decided on May 22, 2000. In this case, the Appellant, United States filed a direct appeal pursuant to section 561 of the Telecommunications Act, 1996. In the prior history of this case, the Appellee, Playboy Entertainment Group, challenged the Telecommunications Act of 1996 by asserting that section 505 was an unreasonably limiting content-oriented statute offensive of the First Amendment. In its previous ruling, the court held that section 505 infringes the First Amendment. This case signified a contest to the §505 of the Telecommunications Act 1996, Pub. L. 104-104. This section necessitates cable television operators who offer telecasts “primarily committed to sexually-oriented programming” either fully block or scramble the broadcasts or restrict their broadcast to a time when children are not probable to be watching preferably between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. In order to conform to this directive, most of the cable operators implemented the second time broadcasting approach. The upshot of the extensive implementation of the time broadcasting was to do away with the broadcasting of the targeted programming exterior to the shark repellent period in affected cable service parts. In this case, no household would receive this type of programs for two third of the hours of the day. In the appeal case, the court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and affirmed its earlier decision. In the Denver Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc, et al., vs. Federal Communications Commission et al. case, the court noted that Section 10 (b) infringes the First Amendment. The court noted that tis section had speech limiting effects on the subscribers and that it was not appropriately designed to protect children from “patently offensive” materials. A close examination of section 10 (a) depicted that the statute appropriately addresses a severe issue without inflicting unnecessary limitation on speech (Breyer et al. 1). The appellant’s dependence on the court’s “public form” is ineffective. It is needless and uninformed to decide on how to use the public forum principle to ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium v FCC, 518 U.S Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium V FCC, 518 U.S Essay)
“Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium V FCC, 518 U.S Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 1 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium v FCC, 518 U.S. 727 United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 U.S

CLS v. Martinez, 561 U. S

...?A LEGAL BRIEF ON THE RECENT U.S. SUPREME COURT RULING IN CLS V. MARTINEZ, 561 U. S. On June 28, the United s Supreme Court gave a ruling on the CLS vs. Martinez, 561 US ___130 S.Ct. 2971, 177 L.Ed.2d 838 (2010). The case was filed by the Christian Legal Society (CLS) at the Hastings College of Law at University of California on the ground that official governing groups should accept all the students regardless of their beliefs and status to acquire recognition. The respondents were Leo Martinez, Acting Chancellor and Dean of Hastings College of Law, University of California; Jacqueline Ortega, Student Services Director; the Board of...
3 Pages(750 words)Coursework

United States v. Wade

...?United s v. Wade A bank robbery on September 21, 1964 in Eustace, Texas led to the arrest of Billy Joe Wade and two others. As per the Miranda Rights of the accused, counsel was duly appointed to Wade in order to represent his legal interests. Two weeks after his arrest, Wade was placed in a line up with other similar looking men where the two employees who were present during the robbery positively identified Wade as one of the perpetrators. The witness identification procedure was undertaken by the FBI without considering the need of the accused to have legal counsel present. During the trial, Wade's legal counsel tried to get an acquittal for their client based upon their belief that the Fifth Amendment Rights of their client... was...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Complexities of the U. s financial system

...? Complexities of the U. S financial system Complexities of the U. S financial system The US financial system is extremely complexand is affected by a number of environmental factors, which include the economy and federal regulations. The complexities inherent in the US financial system also impact different aspects of the economy, as well as the existence of businesses and individuals in the country (Pryor, 1996). This paper will examine the complexities of the US financial system, discussing different aspects of the system, for instance, financial markets and the Federal Reserve System. The US financial system consists of the financial markets, which impact individuals,...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

United States v. Lopez

...was wrong (Fedorko, 2001). Initial decision The clause of the Gun-Free School Zones Act that prohibited possession of firearms within school premises or within 1,000 ft. of a school falls under section 922(q). Alphonso’s appeal to dismiss the case was rejected by the District Court on the grounds that s 922(q) is a “constitutional exercise of Congress’ power to regulate activities in and affecting commerce” (United States v. Lopez, 2013). Going against this decision of the court, it was held by the Court of Appeals that there was not enough “congressional findings and legislative history” (United States v. Lopez, 2013)...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Inaugural addresses by U. S. Presidents

...addresses of the U.S presidents, it is quite conclusive that majority of them are discouraging arm race so as to prevent future nuclear wars. Jimmy Carter shares his concern over the modern arm race. Cater shares his fear and anxiety over the present state of affairs when he remarked that “The world is still engaged in a massive armaments race designed to ensure continuing equivalent strength among potential adversaries.” To conclude one can infer that the speeches of the American presidents upheld the concepts of disarmament, balance of power and deterrence. Works Cited Bush W. George. (2001). Excerpt from George W. Bush’s First Inaugural Address. Carter Jimmy. (1977). Excerpts from Jimmy Carter’s Inaugural...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

U. S. Constitution

...US Constitution s right in American political system refers to the political rights reserved for the governments. Even though America asa whole has a federal government, each state in America has separate state governments. US constitution provides some specific rights to the state governments in law making even though all the state governments are operating under the federal government. The rights of the state government are protected by the tenth amendments (Part of bill of rights) in US constitution. According to The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; “The powers not delegated to the United...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

The U>S Legal System

...Legal Issue and a Strong and Substantiate Argument in Support of Your Opinion Task The case is centered on two counts: counts of murder and burglary. On the count of murder, the defendant is accused of the first degree murder. First-degree murder, in most states, is an illegal killing that is both premeditated and willful, meaning that it was committed after "lying in wait" or planning for the victim. In this case, the deceased had earlier wanted to dispose of some of her diamond rings, though not clear. The defendant may have been involved in the deal and latter planned to kill her for the rings. That again introduces another crime committed – burglary. Based on the evidence provided, the defendant broke into Stella...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

U. S. Education Today & Tomorrow

..., 2002). Moreover, school choice gives parents the freedom of deciding and controlling which schools their children attend. In addition, it dictates on the kind of education children obtain. Furthermore, programs of privatization are diverse and designed to achieve several objectives. To this end, private education may advance equity which most public funding does not. Thus, the school choice and privatization promote national social cohesion which is positive to the future of American education. References Beach, S. (2008, February 15). Tech Learning : No Limits. Classroom Technology News | Educational Apps | Blooms Taxonomy | Retrieved November 14, 2012, from http... ...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

U S History

..., 2005). Work citied Greenberg, Brian, and Linda S. Watts. Social History of the United States. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO, 2009. print. Hamilton, Neil A. The 1970s. New York: Facts On File, 2006. Internet resource. Horowitz, Daniel. Jimmy Carter and the Energy Crisis of the 1970s: The "crisis of Confidence" Speech of July 15, 1979 ; a Brief History with Documents. New York, NY [u.a.: Bedford/St. Martins, 2005. Print.... "Crisis of Confidence" in the United s The United s was a dominant world power in the 1970’s even though the countries self-perception was mired in doubt and malaise. The stagflation of the country’s economy, the experience and...
2 Pages(500 words)Admission/Application Essay

United States v. Jones

...United s v. Jones In the fourth amendment of US constitution, unreasonable searches and seizures against an individual are prohibited and require the judicial sanction of warrants before searches, seizures are initiated, and there must be a probable cause to effect the same (Wetterer 24). Under the amendment, searches and seizure warrants are limited depending on the information made available to the court issuing the search and seizure warrants by an officer, who swears by the same (Wetterer 78). Aspects based on the fourth amendment forms the basis for the case between United States versus Jones. In the making of court decisions involving the fourth...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium v FCC, 518 U.S. 727 United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 U.S for FREE!

Contact Us