Analysis of Mobile Phones in Romantic Relationships Article by Duran, Kelly, and Rotaru - Research Paper Example

Does a relationship exist between cell phone applications and perceptions of the dialectical autonomy pressure versus connection among romantic relationships in young people? “What sources of autonomy-connection conflict pertain to cell phone use within romantic relationships do individuals report?” Does a difference in sources of phone-based conflicts exist between individuals who experience “high versus low levels of autonomy-connection dialectical tension”? Which strategies to the target population use to resolve autonomy-connection conflicts that relate to cell phone application?

(Duran, Kelly, and Rotaru, 2011, p. 23). The researchers do not offer research hypotheses but these can be inferred from the research questions. The authors explain their expected findings on the research questions from the literature review that established existing knowledge in the subject of study and the aim of expanding the existing knowledge and this means that the study’s findings are supposed to be consistent with the already developed knowledge regarding the research questions. The authors relied on previously developed information and not specific theories (Duran, Kelly, and Rotaru, 2011).

Analysis of the methods section The researchers’ description of the participants’ selection strategy identifies a stratified sampling approach, a technique that classifies participants with identifiable features before sampling from each category. Stratified sampling is recognized for generating representative samples. The categories, used by the researchers, are upper-division courses and lower-division courses. Two hundred and ten participants were used in the study, 145 of whom were women while 45 were men and the participants had an average age of.

The role of cell phone usage in the dialectic of autonomy vs connection within young adult romantic relationships The statement of purpose is therefore clear and is expressly stated. The authors offer many justifications for undertaking the study and one of the justifications is the existence of an information gap on the subtopic that remains unexplored within the wider topic of mobile phone usability. Background information into the study that identifies an increasing trend in phone ownership among teenagers, previous studies on rates of phone applications and the role of phones in social initiatives, among friends, and within social networks with little focus on the role of phone usage in dialectic autonomy versus connection among adults is one of the offered reasons for the study.

The need to obtain solutions for developed questions from the study’s background information is another justification that the authors offer for the study. The questions relate to partners’ perception of the role of mobile phones in the “autonomy-connection dialectic” and potential conflict among partners regarding cell phone usage. The researchers’ description of the participants’ selection strategy identifies a stratified sampling approach, a technique that classifies participants with identifiable features before sampling from each category.

Stratified sampling is recognized for generating representative samples. The categories, used by the researchers, are upper-division courses and lower-division courses.