Pro Life Campaign - Research Paper Example

College Pro Life Campaign The United s abortion movement also known as the United s life movement or simply the USApro-life movement is a political and social movement based in the USA that opposes any form of abortion on demand procedure. Be it a self sponsored or insurance sponsored procedure, the group is always out to oppose it. The group has had both moral as well as sectarian grounds to defend their stand and in most cases have even moved to court to oppose the legalization of abortion. The group argues that life begins at conception and any person who knowingly removes life should be punishable by law. They also argue that hospitals should not be allowed to perform this controversial procedure. This group does change their stand only on any grounds of incest, rape or situations when the mother’s life is at risk (Derr, 2005). Tactics The major tactics of pro-life is ultrasound legislation. This is where the group uses words to guilt mothers from taking an abortion. In most cases, the mothers feel the guilt and end up not doing the abortion but after some period of time, the same mothers come back for this procedure. This strategy even though has had some of its positive impacts; in most cases it has only been successful for some periods of time. The group also uses biblical statements to make their stands arguing that God does not promote abortion. This only works out for the few people who are religious and believe in God. However, there are people who have no religious beliefs and so they always go ahead and perform the procedure. As a result of this, the pro life organizers have been able to go to court to help convince the legislators to stop this inhumane act and in some states; this has been a success with most of the states accepting to illegalize this act only allowing it in certain circumstances (Prolife Alliance, 2007). The other tactic that the group is using is education. The group realized that responsibility can only be instilled through proper education into the minds of people. They do this by talking to teenagers and adults separately about the responsibility that comes with sexuality. They also advice women on safe sex and encourage them to always learn that abortion is never the only option that is available. The group always teaches the girls on other options that are available for the baby in case they don’t want the baby. They can always think of other ideas such as foster care that provides care to children who are neglected. In most cases, this strategy has been very beneficial and most of the women have had to change their minds on abortion and have opted for other available options. In most cases, the government has also moved in to support this course of action since abortion has become a national issue and with women demanding for their rights, it has been a challenge convincing them against this action. Education strategies have therefore helped a lot (Alcorn, 2002). The other major strategy that the group uses is the shock and awe strategy. This is where they present pictures of dead infants and other disgusting images that make the public see the real truth in abortion. This has greatly touched many mothers and as a result, they have opted for other options other than abortion. This technique has been successful especially with commercial sex workers who are one of the largest populations that have abortion every year. Most Americans support prolife activities mainly because of this technique. The technique has not only touched the mothers but the general public as well. This has drawn debates and other public awareness campaigns to make abortion illegal and to educate girls and anyone affected on alternative methods (Alcorn, 2004). Legality Though pro life organizers have been met with different legal challenges, the movement is completely legal and its mission and vision have no illegal intention in them. However, the group has received a lot of threats from various groups. Many of the anti pro-choice organizers have moved to court to object to some of the pro-life actions such as using images of dead children to present their message. Most argue that these images do not fit to be shown to the general public especially because the contents might cause discomfort among many people. As a result of this, the group has been forced to change some of its strategies and they have in most cases been forced to use these images privately with the consent of the viewer and always warn the viewer of what the images contains (Prolife Alliance, 2007). Pro-choice a major group that campaigns for abortion has had a lot of challenges with pro-life and in many occasions they have all moved to court to petition against some of their actions. The legality of these actions has been a major setback especially for pro-life that has received warnings and sometimes been given court orders not to conduct some campaigns due to public concerns. It is however important to note that most of prolife activities have been accepted to all people of all age groups and adults as well as children can now participate in their educational programs. Issues following prolife activities The main issues following prolife campaigns are the issues of content exposal. This is where the group has been accused of exposing the general public to very harsh contents. For example, the group has been charged with exposing the public to very disturbing images especially those images from abortion such as dead infants and bleeding mothers. This has raised a lot of questions on whether the group should be allowed to conduct such activities. The group has therefore been forced to use other methods to communicate their message to their clients other than the disturbing images. There are a lot of positive effects of this group to the general public. The group has been able to ethically persuade people to shy away from abortion and as a result, they have not only been able o save the life of innocent children but they have also been in the fore front in saving the lives of mothers. The campaign is very organized and has received a lot of public approval especially from politician, schools and churches which urge the group to continue with its campaigns. Work cited Alcorn, R. C. (2004). Why prolife?. Sisters, Or: Multnomah Publishers. Prolife Alliance., & Prolife Alliance. (2007). Prolife alliance: Manifesto 1997. London: Prolife Alliance. Alcorn, R. C. (2002). Prolife answers to prochoice arguments. Portland, Or: Multnomah Derr, M. K., Naranj0-Huebl, L., & MacNair, R. (2005). Prolife feminism: Yesterday & today. New York, NY: Sulzburger & Graham Pub. Right to Life of Kansas. (2000). Prolife pipeline. Wichita, Kan: Right to Life of Kansas, Inc. Read More